Cited by 133Menstrual Health and DisordersMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a systematic review

Lustyk, M. Kathleen B., Gerrish, Winslow G., Shaver, Shelley, Keys, Shaunie L.·2009·Archives of Women s Mental Health

Abstract

We systematically reviewed empirical studies that investigated the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Our multi-database search identified seven published empirical reports. Three were identified as randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The methods utilized to investigate therapeutic efficacy of CBT in these studies varied widely from case reports to RCTs with pharmacotherapy comparison groups. Initially we provide a brief overview of CBT and justifications for its potential use to treat PMS/PMDD. Next, we provide critical evaluations of the analyses used in each study focusing on the detection of intervention effects assessed by statistically significant time by group interactions. When possible we calculate effect sizes to elucidate the clinical significance of results. Our review revealed a dearth of evidence providing statistically significant CBT intervention effects. Issues such as overall time investment, latency to treatment effects, and complementary and combined therapies are considered. We present a theoretical argument for applying mindfulness- and acceptance-based CBT interventions to PMS/PMDD and suggest future research in this area. In conclusion, to produce the necessary evidence-base support for PMS/PMDD given the limited empirical evidence reported here, researchers are called on to produce methodologically rigorous investigations of psychosocial interventions for PMS/PMDD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-009-0052-y

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lustyk, M. K. B., Gerrish, W. G., Shaver, S., & Keys, S. L.
Affiliations
Seattle Pacific University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerrish, Winslow G.
Venue
Archives of Women s Mental Health
Published
2009-02-27
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
85-96
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2076474294
Cited by
133
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, psychosocial interventions, mindfulness-based interventions, acceptance-based therapy, treatment efficacy, menstrual disorders, effect size
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Premenstrual Syndrome, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review