Cited by 50Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Well-Being of Latina Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Assault Receiving Trauma-Informed and Culturally-Specific Services

Serrata, Josephine V., Rodriguez, Rebecca, Castro, Janice E., Hernandez-Martinez, Martha·2020·Journal of Family Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-019-00049-z

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serrata, J. V., Rodriguez, R., Castro, J. E., & Hernandez-Martinez, M.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Serrata, Josephine V.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2019-04-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
169-180
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W2932508516
Cited by
50
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Funders
Administration for Children and Families (90EV413.04-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
intimate partner violence, sexual assault, trauma-informed practice, well-being, community-based services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review