Cited by 72Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceHomelessness and Social IssuesChild Abuse and Trauma

Evaluation of the effects of receiving trauma-informed practices on domestic violence shelter residents

Sullivan, Cris M., Goodman, Lisa A., Virden, Tyler, Strom, Jennifer, Ramirez, Rachel·2018·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

Domestic violence is a potentially traumatizing experience that has devastating psychological and physical consequences. In response, domestic violence shelter programs have focused increasing attention on helping adult and child survivors understand and heal from this trauma. What have come to be called trauma-informed practices include (a) reflecting an understanding of trauma and its many effects on health and behavior, (b) addressing both physical and psychological safety concerns, (c) using a culturally informed strengths-based approach, (d) helping to illuminate the nature and effects of abuse on survivors' everyday experience; and (e) providing opportunities for clients to regain control over their lives. Despite the proliferation of these practices, little is known about their effects on survivors. In response, the current study explored the extent to which trauma-informed practices, as experienced by shelter residents, related to changes in their levels of self-efficacy, safety-related empowerment, and depressive symptoms over the course of approximately 30 days in shelter. Fifty-seven shelter residents from 4 programs in Ohio completed surveys shortly after arriving in shelter and again before exit. Their perception of the degree to which they received trauma-informed services was associated with significant improvement in their self-efficacy and safety-related empowerment, but had no impact on depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms decreased over time, regardless of receipt of trauma-informed practice. Implications for policy and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ort0000286

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, C. M., Goodman, L. A., Virden, T., Strom, J., & Ramirez, R.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Boston College (US)
  • Ohio Domestic Violence Network (US)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2018
Volume
88
Issue
5
Pages
563-570
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W2748551574
Cited by
72
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
trauma-informed practice, domestic violence, women's shelters, shelter residents, self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, strengths-based approach, psychological safety, abuse survivors
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Ohio, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Wounds and Injuries, Domestic Violence, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review