Cited by 118Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Parents’ Perceptions of Autism Spectrum Disorder Etiology and Recurrence Risk and Effects of their Perceptions on Family Planning: Recommendations for Genetic Counselors

Selkirk, Christina G., McCarthy Veach, Patricia, Lian, Fengqin, Schimmenti, Lisa, LeRoy, Bonnie S.·2009·Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Knowledge about the etiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) is increasing, but causes remain elusive for most cases. Genetic counselors are positioned to help families that have children with ASDs despite uncertainty regarding etiology. To determine how genetic counselors might best provide services, an anonymous survey was conducted with 255 parents whose children were diagnosed on the autism spectrum. Questions concerned: 1) their perceptions of ASD cause(s) and 2) recurrence risk, 3) whether perceived risk affected family planning decisions, 4) whether parents had received genetic services, and 5) how genetic counselors might assist families. The most prevalent perceived cause was genetic influences (72.6%). Most parents’ recurrence risk perceptions were inaccurately high and significantly affected family planning. Only 10% had seen a genetic professional related to an ASD. Parents provided several suggestions for genetic counselor best practices. Findings indicate the importance of genetic counselor awareness of parent perceptions in order to best help families who have children with ASDs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10897-009-9233-0

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selkirk, C. G., McCarthy Veach, P., Lian, F., Schimmenti, L., & LeRoy, B. S.
Affiliations
  • Endeavor Health (US)
  • Department of Educational Psychology University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Selkirk, Christina G.
Venue
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-02
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
507-519
ISSN
  • 1059-7700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3599
OpenAlex
W2093976142
Cited by
118
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Genetic Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parental attitudes, etiology, recurrence risk, family planning, genetic counseling, genetic counselors, genetic services, risk perception
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Family Planning Services, Female, Genetic Counseling, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Recurrence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review