Cited by 180Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFamily and Disability Support Research

Recurrence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Full- and Half-Siblings and Trends Over Time: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Open access
Grønborg, Therese K., Schendel, Diana E., Parner, Erik T.·2013·JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: To date, this is the first population-based study to examine the recurrence risk for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), including time trends, and the first study to consider the ASDs recurrence risk for full- and half-siblings. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the relative recurrence risk for ASDs in a Danish population, including recurrence in full- and half-siblings, and to examine time trends in ASDs relative to the recurrence risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based cohort study in Denmark. All children (about 1.5 million) born in Denmark between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2004, were identified and followed up to December 31, 2010. We identified a maternal sibling subcohort derived from mothers with at least 2 children and a paternal sibling subcohort derived from fathers with at least 2 children. EXPOSURES: Children having an older sibling with ASDs are compared with children not having an older sibling with ASDs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The adjusted hazard ratio for ASDs among children having an older sibling with ASDs compared with children not having an older sibling with ASDs. RESULTS The overall relative recurrence risk for ASDs was 6.9 (95% CI, 6.1-7.8), and it did not change significantly over time; similar risks were observed in maternal and paternal full-siblings. The relative recurrence risks were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4-4.1) for maternal half-siblings and 1.5 (95% CI, 0.7-3.4) for paternal half-siblings. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our population-based recurrence risk estimate is lower than the recently reported estimates from clinical samples. Our results demonstrate no time trend in the ASDs recurrence risk as seen in the ASDs prevalence. The difference in the recurrence risk between full- and half-siblings supports the role of genetics in ASDs, while the significant recurrence risk in maternal half-siblings may support the role of factors associated with pregnancy and the maternal intrauterine environment in ASDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2259

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only few earlier studies have had the possibility to calculate the relative recurrence risk.

    “Only few earlier studies have had the possibility to calculate the RR8,27,28.”

    From The Familial Risk of Autism (2014) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Differences in the prevalence of ASD among males and females are among the most well-documented features of the disorder, but these sex differences vary by sample and ascertainment procedure.

    “Differences in the prevalence of ASD among males and females are among the most well-documented features of the disorder, but these sex differences vary by sample and ascertainment procedure [3, 8, 33].”
  • The liability threshold model helps explain the relatively high sibling risk, the greater mutational burden in ASD probands than unaffected siblings, etiological heterogeneity within affected sibling pairs, and variable expressivity of certain loci.

    “The model helps in the understanding of the relatively high risk for siblings of individuals diagnosed with ASD (13,46), the increased mutational burden in ASD probands compared with their unaffected siblings (22,28), etiological heterogeneity even within pairs of affected siblings (47,48) and, as we shall discuss further, the variable expressivity of certain loci (49,50) (Fig. 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grønborg, T. K., Schendel, D. E., & Parner, E. T.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Grønborg, Therese K.
Venue
JAMA Pediatrics
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
167
Issue
10
Pages
947
ISSN
  • 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6203
OpenAlex
W2150648630
Cited by
180
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 2
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, recurrence risk, siblings, full siblings, half-siblings, genetic risk, intrauterine environment, pregnancy factors, temporal trends
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Recurrence, Registries, Risk, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Proportional Hazards Models, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review