The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Healthcare Workers in Italy: Results from a National E-Survey
Open accessAbstract
Italy has been the first-hit European country to face the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Aim of this survey was to assess in depth the impact of the outbreak on healthcare workers (HCW). A 40-item online survey was disseminated via social media inviting Italian HCW, with questions exploring demographics, health status and work environment of respondents. A total of 527 were invited to take part in March 2020, of whom 74% (n = 388) responded to the survey. Of these, 235 (61%) were women. HCW were mostly physicians (74%), from high-prevalence regions (52%). 25% experienced typical symptoms during the last 14 days prior to survey completion, with only 45% of them being tested for COVID-19. Among the tested population, 18 (18%) resulted positive for COVID-19, with 33% being asymptomatic. Only 22% of HCW considered personal protective equipment adequate for quality and quantity. Females and respondents working in high-risk sectors were more likely to rate psychological support as useful (OR, 1.78 [CI 95% 1.14–2.78] P = 0.012, and 2.02 [1.12–3.65] P = 0.020, respectively) and workload as increased (mean increase, 0.38 [0.06–0.69] P = 0.018; and 0.54 [0.16–0.92] P = 0.005, respectively). The insights from this survey may help authorities in countries where COVID-19 epidemic has not yet broken out. Management strategies should be promptly undertaken in order to enhance safety and optimise resource allocation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eysenbach, G. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34 · Cited by 6,480
Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy
Onder, G., Rezza, G., & Brusaferro, S. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4683 · Cited by 4,171
Cited by
Gómez-Ochoa, S. A., Franco, O. H., Rojas, L. Z., Raguindin, P. F., Roa-Díaz, Z. M., Wyssmann, B. M., Guevara, S. L. R., Echeverría, L. E., Glisic, M., & Muka, T. (2021) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa191 · Cited by 785
COVID-19 and healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gholami, M., Fawad, I., Shadan, S., Rowaiee, R., Ghanem, H., Hassan Khamis, A., & Ho, S. B. (2021) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.013 · Cited by 353
Mohammadi, F., Masoumi, Z., Oshvandi, K., Khazaei, S., & Bijani, M. (2022) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-022-00931-0 · Cited by 56
“The mysterious nature of COVID-19 and the frequent mutations of the coronavirus have infected more than 250 million people and killed more than 5 million people worldwide to date [4, 5].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Felice, C., Di Tanna, G. L., Zanus, G., & Grossi, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Community Health
- Published
- 2020-05-22
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 675-683
- ISSN
- 0094-5145 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3610
- OpenAlex
- W3026330595
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Healthcare Workers in Italy: Results from a National E-Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10900-020-00845-5
- The paper
- Felice, C., Di Tanna, G. L., Zanus, G., & Grossi, U. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Healthcare Workers in Italy: Results from a National E-Survey. Journal of Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00845-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.