Cited by 95Income, Poverty, and InequalityHealth disparities and outcomesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Income Inequality, Life Satisfaction Inequality and Trust: A Cross Country Panel Analysis

Open access
Graafland, Johan, Lous, Bjorn·2019·Journal of Happiness Studies

Abstract

Literature has argued that income inequality crowds out trust. However, whether income inequality makes people less trusting depends on how they perceive income inequality within their personal social context and social cognition. In this paper we therefore conjecture that the relationship of income inequality to trust depends on how income inequality affects inequality of life satisfaction. If life satisfaction inequality is high, distrust is generated among the least happy. This will increase polarization and the risk of rebellion, thereby also affecting trust among the happier people. Thus, life satisfaction inequality may be an essential factor in the relationship between income inequality and trust. In previous literature, the potential mediating role of life satisfaction inequality in the relationship between income inequality and social trust has not yet received attention. We test our model by panel analysis on 25 OECD countries in the period 1990–2014. The panel analysis shows that income inequality increases life satisfaction inequality and that both income inequality and life satisfaction inequality have a significant negative impact on social trust. Mediation tests show complementary mediation: besides the direct negative effect of income inequality on trust, we find an indirect effect mediated by life satisfaction inequality. This indirect effect counts for 20% of the total effect of income inequality on trust. Our results imply that policy options for increasing trust are not limited to countering income inequality, but can also include policy measures that directly reduce inequality of life satisfaction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-018-0021-0

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When individuals feel miserable and perceive that things cannot get any worse for them, they rebel.

    “When individuals feel miserable and perceive that things cannot get any worse for them, they rebel (Graafland & Lous, 2019).”

    From Risk, Trust, and the Roles of Human Versus Virtual Influencers (2024) · cites this paper as Graafland & Lous, 2019

    Section 3.1 says individuals rebel only if they feel miserable and believe things cannot get worse. That makes those feelings a prerequisite, whereas the citing sentence says they lead to rebellion. The same passage describes oppressed people as likely to support rebellion, not certain to rebel. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Berg, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. In B. Greve (Ed.), Social policy and happiness in Europe (chap. 11, pp. 174-194). Cheltenham: E. Elgar.
  2. Bjørnskov, C. (2005). The determinants of trust. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Aarhus School of Business. http://ssrn.com/abstr act=90018 3.
  3. Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1997). Health and social cohesion: Why care about income inequality? BMJ. British Medical Journal, 314(7086), 1037.
  4. Veenhoven, R. (2000). Freedom and happiness. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective wellbeing (pp. 257-288). Boston: MIT Press.
  5. Wegener, B. (1999). Belohnungs-und Prinzipiengerechtigkeit: Die zwei Weltern der empirischen Gerech- tigkeitsforschung. In U. Druwe & V. Kunz (Eds.), Politische Gerechtigkeit (pp. 167-214). Opladen: Leske and Budrich.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graafland, J., & Lous, B.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Graafland, Johan
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2018-08-25
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1717-1737
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2888367373
Cited by
95
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
14.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
income inequality, social trust, trust, mediation, OECD countries, social polarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review