Cited by 60Face Recognition and PerceptionCognitive Abilities and TestingDeception detection and forensic psychology

Exploring the Role of Working Memory in Dynamic Social Cue Decoding Using Dual Task Methodology

Phillips, Louise H., Tunstall, Mary, Channon, Shelley·2007·Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10919-007-0026-6

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, L. H., Tunstall, M., & Channon, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Louise H.
Venue
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Published
2007-03-10
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
137-152
ISSN
  • 0191-5886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3653
OpenAlex
W2075321716
Cited by
59
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nonverbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
working memory, social perception, emotion recognition, kin recognition, clinical populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review