Cited by 61Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Neurocognitive and behavioral predictors of social problems in ADHD: A Bayesian framework.

Open access
Kofler, Michael J., Harmon, Sherelle L., Aduen, Paula A., Day, Taylor N., Austin, Kristin E., Spiegel, Jamie A., Irwin, Lauren, Sarver, Dustin E.·2018·Neuropsychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Social problems are a key area of functional impairment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and converging evidence points to executive dysfunction as a potential mechanism underlying ADHD-related social dysfunction. The evidence is mixed, however, with regard to which neurocognitive abilities account for these relations. METHOD: A well-characterized group of 117 children ages 8-13 (M = 10.45, SD = 1.53; 43 girls; 69.5% Caucasian/Non-Hispanic) with ADHD (n = 77) and without ADHD (n = 40) were administered multiple, counterbalanced tests of neurocognitive functioning and assessed for social skills via multi-informant reports. RESULTS: Bayesian linear regressions revealed strong support for working memory and cross-informant interfering behaviors (inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity) as predictors of parent- and teacher-reported social problems. Working memory was also implicated in social skills acquisition deficits, performance deficits, and strengths based on parent and/or teacher report; inattention and/or hyperactivity showed strong correspondence with cross-informant social problems in all models. There was no evidence for, and in most models strong evidence against, effects of inhibitory control and processing speed. The ADHD group was impaired relative to the non-ADHD group on social skills (d = 0.82-0.88), visuospatial working memory (d = 0.89), and phonological working memory (d = 0.58). In contrast, the Bayesian ANOVAs indicated that the ADHD and non-ADHD groups were equivalent on processing speed, IQ, age, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES). There was no support for or against group differences in inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that ADHD is associated with impaired social performance, and implicate working memory and core ADHD symptoms in the acquisition and performance of socially skilled behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/neu0000416

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social difficulties in ADHD appear to reflect a performance deficit rather than a lack of social knowledge or skills.

    “the social difficulties observed in ADHD seem to reflect a performance deficit (such as intrusiveness, inattention to social cues, and impulsive social behavior that result in peer rejection), rather than a lack of social knowledge or skills.7–9”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Clinical and Research Implications section (page not supplied) describes social problems as in situ performance deficits. But the Results also report teacher-rated social-skills acquisition deficits, and the Discussion links ADHD symptoms to both acquisition and performance. The source therefore does not support excluding a lack of acquired social skills as a contributor. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emerging evidence suggests that executive function heterogeneity may help explain heterogeneity in functional impairments among children with ADHD and/or ASD.

    “emerging evidence suggests that this executive function heterogeneity may prove fruitful for understanding heterogeneity in functional impairments for children with ADHD and/or ASD.8,53,91–93”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Abstract (Objective and Results; page not provided) links executive dysfunction to social problems in children with ADHD and reports that working memory, but not inhibitory control or processing speed, predicted those problems. This supports the claim for ADHD-related social impairment, but the paper does not establish the broader claim about functional impairments in children with ASD. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These studies showed that working memory but not inhibition deficits predict ADHD-related difficulties with emotion regulation, academic achievement and productivity, organizational skills, activities of daily living, inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptom severity, information processing speed, and peer relationships.

    “These studies also showed that working memory but not inhibition deficits predict ADHD-related difficulties with emotion regulation, academic achievement and productivity, organizational skills, activities of daily living, inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptom severity, information processing speed, and peer relationships.8,27,31,36,37,58,156,158–161”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion and Abstract Results report that working memory predicted social problems in children with ADHD, while inhibitory control generally did not. This supports the peer-relationships portion, but the paper does not establish the listed effects on emotion regulation, academic and organizational functioning, daily living, symptom severity, or processing speed. It treats ADHD symptoms and processing speed as potential predictors of social problems, not as outcomes predicted by working-memory deficits. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Baddeley A 2007 Working memory, thought, and action Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
  2. Landau S Moore LA 1991 Social skill deficits in children with ADHD School Psychology Review 20 235 251
  3. Merrell KW Boelter E 2001 An investigation of relationships between social behavior and ADHD in children and youth Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders 9 260 269
  4. Reynolds CR Kamphaus RW 2004 BASC- 2: Behavior Assessment System for Children: Second Edition, manual Bloomington, MN Pearson
  5. Sattler J Dumont R Coalson D 2016 Assessment of Children: WISC-V and WPPSI-IV San Diego, CA Sattler Press
  6. Saunders B Chambers SM 1996 A review of the literature on ADHD children: Peer interactions and collaborative learning Psychology in the Schools 33 333 340
  7. Wells EL Harmon S Kofler MJ Ferretti N Francis B Saunders K Menard B 2015 One cheer for digit span: Alternate administration and scoring methods may improve working memory measurement Poster presented at the 49th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies Convention Chicago

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kofler, M. J., Harmon, S. L., Aduen, P. A., Day, T. N., Austin, K. E., Spiegel, J. A., Irwin, L., & Sarver, D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2018-03
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
344-355
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2795509240
Cited by
61
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Galant Family
  • National Institutes of Health (R34 MH102499-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, social problems, social skills, working memory, executive dysfunction, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, inhibitory control, processing speed, children, parent and teacher ratings, visuospatial working memory, phonological working memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Bayes Theorem, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Parents, Social Behavior Disorders, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Neurocognitive Disorders, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review