The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between narcissistic exploitativeness, dispositional empathy, and emotion recognition abilities.
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, it does not contradict other findings concerning particular components of narcissism and specific emotional competencies (Konrath et al., 2014).”
From Do Narcissism and Emotional Intelligence Win Us Friends? Modeling Dynamics of Peer Popularity Using Inferential Network Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as Konrath et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Yet, in a study by Konrath, Corneille, Bushman, and Luminet (2014), exploitativeness, the facet of narcissism most closely related to manipulation, was positively linked to emotion recognition skills.”
From Do Narcissism and Emotional Intelligence Win Us Friends? Modeling Dynamics of Peer Popularity Using Inferential Network Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as Konrath, Corneille, Bushman, and Luminet (2014)
In the citing paper
“They demonstrated that narcissists’ ability to read others’ emotions is driven by the trait E/E.”
From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“The first model tested is a reduced 17-item version proposed by Konrath et al. (2014).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Konrath et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Konrath et al. (2014) also proposed two subscales - (1) Positive Affect; and (2) Negative Affect—with two of the 17 items from the Konrath Reduced Scale Model not used on either subscale.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Konrath et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Konrath et al. (2014) utilized a short-form measure of the Eyes Test, including only 17 of the full 36 items, and reported the internal consistency was poor (α = 0.23).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Konrath et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Also, as presented above, we found that the affect classifications by Konrath et al. (2014) and by Harkness et al. (2005) were a poor organization of the items, suggesting that the affect of the target word does not predict performance in any meaningful way.”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Konrath et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg · Cited by 10,484
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6 · Cited by 5,265
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715 · Cited by 4,555 · cited 4×
“Emotional competency was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (Baron-Cohen et al. 2001), a widely used assessment of affect/emotion recognition in clinical (e.”
MethodInfluentialBaron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 4,313
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach
Davis, M. H. (1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2454 · Cited by 2,442
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 · Cited by 2,273
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Dvorkina, D., Veksler, K., Shirokova, G., & Morris, M. H. (2026) · Entrepreneurship Research Journal · doi:10.1515/erj-2025-0332
Metadata
- Authors
- Konrath, S., Corneille, O., Bushman, B. J., & Luminet, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Konrath, Sara
- Venue
- Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
- Published
- 2013-10-19
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-143
- ISSN
- 0191-5886 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3653
- OpenAlex
- W2005799048
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Nonverbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Keywords
- narcissism, dispositional empathy, emotion recognition, personality traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
