Cited by 159Workplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A Prospective Study of Return to Work Across Health Conditions: Perceived Work Attitude, Self-efficacy and Perceived Social Support

Open access
Brouwer, Sandra, Reneman, Michiel F., Bültmann, Ute, van der Klink, Jac J. L., Groothoff, Johan W.·2010·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to conduct subgroup-analyses in a prospective cohort of workers on long-term sickness absence to investigate whether associations between perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support and time to RTW differ across different health conditions. METHODS: The study was based on a sample of 926 workers on sickness absence (6-12 weeks). The participants filled out a baseline questionnaire and were subsequently followed until the tenth month after listing sick. Perceived work attitude was measured with a Dutch language version of the Work Involvement Scale. Perceived social support was measured with a self-constructed standardized scale reflecting a person's perception of social support regarding RTW. Self-efficacy was measured with the standardised Dutch version of the General self-efficacy scale, assessing the subjects' expectations of their general capacities. The sample was divided into three subgroups: musculoskeletal health conditions, other physical health conditions and mental health conditions. Anova analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify differences in association between the three factors and the time to RTW between different subgroups. RESULTS: The associations between the perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support and the time to RTW vary across different health condition subgroups, not only with regard to the strength of the association but also for the type of factor. In the multivariate model, hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.33 (95% CI 1.01-1.75) in the musculoskeletal subgroup, and 1.26 (95% CI 0.89-1.78) in the other physical subgroup were found in perceived work attitude. With regard to perceived social support HRs of 1.39 (95% CI 1.12-1.99) respectively 1.51 (1.05-2.17) in the same subgroups were found. Only self-efficacy remained in the multivariate model in all subgroups with HRs of 1.49 (95% CI 1.12-1.99) in the musculoskeletal subgroup, 1.53 (95% CI 1.07-2.18) in the other physical subgroup and 1.60 (1.07-2.40) in the mental subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that perceived work attitude, self-efficacy and perceived social support are relevant predictors with regard to the time to RTW in all types of health conditions, but that important differences are observed in type of factor and strengths of the relationships between physical and mental health conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-009-9214-z

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial variables such as strong work ethic, expressed desire to work, maintain habits, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and work history have been identified as predictive of success in return to employment or education.

    “Psychosocial variables such as a strong work ethic [25–27], expressed desire to work [28–30], maintain habits [19, 31] and self-esteem, self-efficacy [19, 32–34] and work history [15, 35] have also been investigated and identified as predictive of success in return to employment or education.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brouwer, S., Reneman, M. F., Bültmann, U., van der Klink, J. J. L., & Groothoff, J. W.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Brouwer, Sandra
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2009-11-06
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
104-112
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W2135136846
Cited by
159
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
return to work, sick leave, self-efficacy, perceived social support, musculoskeletal disorders, mental illness, physical health conditions, subgroup analysis, General Self-Efficacy Scale, time to return to work, occupational health, social support at work, work engagement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Work, Work Capacity Evaluation, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Sick Leave, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review