Cited by 13Workplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

The Combination of Work Organizational Climate and Individual Work Commitment Predicts Return to Work in Women But Not in Men

Holmgren, Kristina, Ekbladh, Elin, Hensing, Gunnel, Dellve, Lotta·2013·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze if the combination of organizational climate and work commitment can predict return to work (RTW). METHODS: This prospective Swedish study was based on 2285 participants, 19 to 64 years old, consecutively selected from the employed population, newly sick-listed for more than 14 days. Data were collected in 2008 through postal questionnaire and from register data. RESULTS: Among women, the combination of good organizational climate and fair work commitment predicted an early RTW with an adjusted relative risk of 2.05 (1.32 to 3.18). Among men, none of the adjusted variables or combinations of variables was found significantly to predict RTW. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the importance of integrative effects of organizational climate and individual work commitment on RTW among women. These factors did not predict RTW in men. More research is needed to understand the RTW process among men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e3182820536

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial variables such as strong work ethic, expressed desire to work, maintain habits, self-esteem, self-efficacy, and work history have been identified as predictive of success in return to employment or education.

    “Psychosocial variables such as a strong work ethic [25–27], expressed desire to work [28–30], maintain habits [19, 31] and self-esteem, self-efficacy [19, 32–34] and work history [15, 35] have also been investigated and identified as predictive of success in return to employment or education.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmgren, K., Ekbladh, E., Hensing, G., & Dellve, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Holmgren, Kristina
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2013-02
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
121-127
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096242523
Cited by
13
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
return to work, organizational climate, work commitment, sick leave, sex differences, women, sick-listed employees
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sweden, Organizational Culture, Linear Models, Workplace, Sick Leave, Young Adult, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review