Cited by 34Occupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesWorkplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Multi-faceted case management: reducing compensation costs of musculoskeletal work injuries in Australia

Iles, Ross Anthony, Wyatt, M., Pransky, G.·2012·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine whether a multi-faceted model of management of work related musculoskeletal disorders reduced compensation claim costs and days of compensation for injured workers.Methods An intervention including early reporting, employee centred case management and removal of barriers to return to work was instituted in 16 selected companies with a combined remuneration over $337 million. Outcomes were evaluated by an administrative dataset from the Victorian WorkCover Authority database. A 'quasi experimental' pre-post design was employed with 492 matched companies without the intervention used as a control group and an average of 21 months of post-intervention follow-up. Primary outcomes were average number of days of compensation and average cost of claims. Secondary outcomes were total medical costs and weekly benefits paid.Results Information on 3,312 claims was analysed. In companies where the intervention was introduced the average cost of claims was reduced from $6,019 to $3,913 (estimated difference $2,329, 95 % CI $1,318-$3,340) and the number of days of compensation decreased from 33.5 to 14.1 (HR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.67-0.88). Medical costs and weekly benefits costs were also lower after the intervention (p < 0.05). Reduction in claims costs were noted across industry types, injury location and most employer sizes.Conclusions The model of claims management investigated was effective in reducing the number of days of compensation, total claim costs, total medical costs and the amount paid in weekly benefits. Further research should investigate whether the intervention improves non-financial outcomes in the return to work process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-012-9364-2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A preliminary search of the literature revealed multiple systematic reviews of interventions to improve recovery from MSK and orthopaedic injuries, many of which report changes in distress-related outcomes following the intervention.

    “A preliminary search of the literature revealed multiple systematic reviews of interventions to improve recovery from MSK and orthopaedic injuries, many of which report changes in distress-related outcomes following the intervention.12 13 22 23”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iles, R. A., Wyatt, M., & Pransky, G.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (US)
Corresponding author
Iles, Ross Anthony
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2012-04-01
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
478-488
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W1981266057
Cited by
34
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN53909)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
occupational injury compensation, case management, return to work, health care costs, injury management
MeSH terms
Accidents, Occupational, Australia, Costs and Cost Analysis, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Industry, Insurance Claim Reporting, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Time Factors, Workers' Compensation, Linear Models, Survival Analysis, Case Management, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review