Cited by 131Aerogels and thermal insulationMesoporous Materials and CatalysisAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis

Silica Aerogels; a Review of Synthesis, Applications and Fabrication of Hybrid Composites

Open access
Akhter, Faheem, Soomro, Suhail Ahmed, Inglezakis, Vassilis J.·2021·Journal of Porous Materials

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10934-021-01091-3

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ambient pressure drying is a relatively straightforward and cost-effective method for producing aerogels on a large scale.

    “Nonetheless, ambient pressure drying is a relatively straightforward and cost-effective method for producing aerogels on a large scale [4].”

    From Silica Aerogels as a Promising Vehicle for Effective Water Splitting for Hydrogen Production (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    Section 2.3.2 (Ambient pressure drying) calls APD cheaper than supercritical drying, but says it requires surface modification and other processing steps. It explicitly says the processing time and chemical use make APD too costly for large-scale production, contrary to the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If aging is increased, the aerogel shows a decrease in bulk density and contraction, unlike gels dried at room temperature.

    “If aging is increased, the aerogel shows a decrease in bulk density and contraction, different to gels dried at room temperature (ambient dried has a larger pore size and volume).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. O. R. Evans, W. E. Rhine, J. F. Nebo, and J. R. Abeles, Jon C., 10,233,303 (2020).
  2. I. Smirnova and P. Gurikov, J. Supercrit. Fluids 134, 228 (2018).
  3. S. Karamikamkar, H. E. Naguib, and C. B. Park, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 276, 102101 (2020).
  4. A. Soleimani Dorcheh and M. H. Abbasi, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 199, 10 (2008).
  5. R. Garrido, J. D. Silvestre, I. Flores-Colen, M. de F. Júlio, and M. Pedroso, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 516, 26 (2019).
  6. Q. Feng, K. Chen, D. Ma, H. Lin, Z. Liu, S. Qin, and Y. Luo, Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 539, 399 (2018).
  7. T. A. Esquivel-Castro, M. C. Ibarra-Alonso, J. Oliva, and A. Martínez-Luévanos, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 96, 915 (2019).
  8. F. P. Soorbaghi, M. Isanejad, S. Salatin, M. Ghorbani, S. Jafari, and H. Derakhshankhah, Biomed. Pharmacother. 111, 964 (2019).
  9. S. P. Patil, P. Shendye, and B. Markert, Scr. Mater. 177, 65 (2020).
  10. A. Venkateswara Rao, N. D. Hegde, and H. Hirashima, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 305, 124 (2007).
  11. G. Zu, J. Shen, X. Wei, X. Ni, Z. Zhang, J. Wang, and G. Liu, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 357, 2903 (2011).
  12. M. Juzkow, Power Electron. 28, 58 (2002).
  13. A. Lamy-Mendes, R. F. Silva, and L. Durães, J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 1340 (2018).
  14. D. Wang, F. Zhang, and J. Tang, Electrochemistry 83, 84 (2015).
  15. C. T. Wang, C. L. Wu, I. C. Chen, and Y. H. Huang, Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 107, 402 (2005).
  16. S. Bag, P. N. Trikalitis, P. J. Chupas, G. S. Armatas, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Science (80-. ). 317, 490 (2007).
  17. Y. Kobayashi, T. Saito, and A. Isogai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 10394 (2014).
  18. N. Mittal, R. Kumar, G. Mishra, D. Deva, and A. Sharma, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1 (2016).
  19. S. Azat, A. V. Korobeinyk, K. Moustakas, and V. J. Inglezakis, J. Clean. Prod. 217, 352 (2019).
  20. K. Ebisike, A. E. Okoronkwo, and K. K. Alaneme, J. King Saud Univ. -Sci. 32, 550 (2020).
  21. Z. Xu, L. Gan, Y. Jia, Z. Hao, M. Liu, and L. Chen, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 41, 203 (2007).
  22. A. Venkateswara Rao, S. D. Bhagat, H. Hirashima, and G. M. Pajonk, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 300, 279 (2006).
  23. Q. Wang, D. B. Mahadik, P. Meti, Y. D. Gong, K. Y. Lee, and H. H. Park, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 294, 109863 (2020).
  24. S. D. Bhagat, C. S. Oh, Y. H. Kim, Y. S. Ahn, and J. G. Yeo, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 100, 350 (2007).
  25. E. J. Zanto, S. A. Al-Muhtaseb, and J. A. Ritter, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 3151 (2002).
  26. R. Rodríguez-Dorado, C. López-Iglesias, C. A. García-González, G. Auriemma, R. P. Aquino, and P. Del Gaudio, Molecules 24, 4 (2019).
  27. N. Buchtová and T. Budtova, Cellulose 23, 2585 (2016).
  28. G. Hayase, S. Nagayama, K. Nonomura, K. Kanamori, A. Maeno, H. Kaji, and K. Nakanishi, J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 5, 104 (2017).
  29. A. Baimenov, D. A. Berillo, S. G. Poulopoulos, and V. J. Inglezakis, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 276, 102088 (2020).
  30. Z. J. Rogers and S. A. Bencherif, Gels 5, 6 (2019).
  31. H. Maleki, L. Durães, and A. Portugal, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 385, 55 (2014).
  32. I. Smirnova and P. Gurikov, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 8, 307 (2017).
  33. J. E. Amonette and J. Matyáš, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 250, 100 (2017).
  34. K. Y. Lee, D. B. Mahadik, V. G. Parale, and H. H. Park, J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 57, 1 (2020).
  35. W. Stöber, A. Fink, and E. Bohn, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26, 62 (1968).
  36. Y. J. Wong, L. Zhu, W. S. Teo, Y. W. Tan, Y. Yang, C. Wang, and H. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11422 (2011).
  37. M. Moner-Girona, A. Roig, E. Molins, and J. Llibre, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 26, 645 (2003).
  38. H. Cai, Y. Jiang, J. Feng, S. Zhang, F. Peng, Y. Xiao, L. Li, and J. Feng, Mater. Des. 191, 108640 (2020).
  39. D. B. Mahadik, A. V. Rao, R. Kumar, S. V. Ingale, P. B. Wagh, and S. C. Gupta, J. Porous Mater. 19, 87 (2012).
  40. K. E. Parmenter and F. Milstein, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 223, 179 (1998).
  41. C. J. Lee, G. S. Kim, and S. H. Hyun, J. Mater. Sci. 37, 2237 (2002).
  42. N. Gupta and W. Ricci, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 198, 178 (2008).
  43. D. Ge, L. Yang, Y. Li, and J. P. Zhao, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 355, 2610 (2009).
  44. C. Q. Hong, J. C. Han, X. H. Zhang, and J. C. Du, Scr. Mater. 68, 599 (2013).
  45. R. Daoussi, S. Vessot, J. Andrieu, and O. Monnier, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87, 899 (2009).
  46. R. M. Asmussen, J. Matyáš, N. P. Qafoku, and A. A. Kruger, J. Hazard. Mater. 379, 119364 (2019).
  47. P. Gerard, Aerogel Synthesis. Catalyst Preparation (Boca Raton: CRC Press., 2006).
  48. S. D. Bhagat, Y. H. Kim, M. J. Moon, Y. S. Ahn, and J. G. Yeo, Solid State Sci. 9, 628 (2007).
  49. M. A. B. Meador, E. F. Fabrizio, F. Ilhan, A. Dass, G. Zhang, P. Vassilaras, J. C. Johnston, and N. Leventis, Chem. Mater. 17, 1085 (2005).
  50. P. Shajesh, S. Smitha, P. R. Aravind, and K. G. K. Warrier, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 50, 353 (2009).
  51. H. Maleki and N. Hüsing, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 221, 530 (2018).
  52. M. R. Kim, J. H. Oh, K. S. Oh, and J. K. Lee, 10,197,211 (2019).
  53. A. M. Ibrahim, B. T. Chiad, W. A. A. Twej, and R. A. Mohammed, Iraqi J. Sci. 60, 119 (2019).
  54. M. Y. Nassar, I. S. Ahmed, and M. A. Raya, J. Mol. Liq. 282, 251 (2019).
  55. S. D. Bhagat and A. V. Rao, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 4289 (2006).
  56. M. de F. Júlio and L. M. Ilharco, Materialia 9, 100527 (2020).
  57. D. Du, Y. Jiang, J. Feng, L. Li, and J. Feng, Vacuum 173, 109117 (2020).
  58. S. D. Bhagat, Y. H. Kim, Y. S. Ahn, and J. G. Yeo, Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 3231 (2007).
  59. A. Venkateswara Rao, M. M. Kulkarni, G. M. Pajonk, D. P. Amalnerkar, and T. Seth, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 27, 103 (2003).
  60. I. De Marco, S. Miranda, S. Riemma, and R. Iannone, Chem. Eng. Trans. 49, 319 (2016).
  61. I. De Marco, S. Riemma, and R. Iannone, J. Supercrit. Fluids 143, 305 (2019).
  62. M. Dowson, M. Grogan, T. Birks, D. Harrison, and S. Craig, Appl. Energy 97, 396 (2012).
  63. Y. Pan, X. Cheng, T. zhou, L. Gong, and H. Zhang, Mater. Lett. 229, 265 (2018).
  64. Y. Pan, S. He, L. Gong, X. Cheng, C. Li, Z. Li, Z. Liu, and H. Zhang, Mater. Des. 113, 246 (2017).
  65. T. Zhou, X. Cheng, Y. Pan, C. Li, L. Gong, and H. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 437, 321 (2018).
  66. F. He, X. He, W. Yang, X. Zhang, and L. Zhou, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 488, 36 (2018).
  67. J. Zhu, J. Hu, C. Jiang, S. Liu, and Y. Li, Carbohydr. Polym. 207, 246 (2019).
  68. H. Tamon, H. Ishizaka, T. Yamamoto, and T. Suzuki, Dry. Technol. 19, 313 (2001).
  69. P. Terzioğlu, S. Yücel, and Ç. Kuş, Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng. 14, 1 (2019).
  70. Y. Xu, N. Porter, J. L. Foster, J. P. Muir, P. Schwab, B. L. Burson, and R. W. Jessup, Agronomy 10, 1 (2020).
  71. J. A. Adebisi, J. O. Agunsoye, S. A. Bello, M. Haris, M. M. Ramakokovhu, M. O. Daramola, and S. B. Hassan, Part. Sci. Technol. 38, 667 (2020).
  72. S. Azat, E. Arkhangelsky, T. Papathanasiou, A. A. Zorpas, A. Abirov, and V. J. Inglezakis, Comptes Rendus Chim. 23, 77 (2020).
  73. H. Nguyen, M. Jamali Moghadam, and H. Moayedi, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 21, 1039 (2019).
  74. J. Choi and D. J. Suh, Catal. Surv. from Asia 11, 123 (2007).
  75. Y. Liao, H. Wu, Y. Ding, S. Yin, M. Wang, and A. Cao, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 63, 445 (2012).
  76. L. Casas, A. Roig, E. Rodríguez, E. Molins, J. Tejada, and J. Sort, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 285, 37 (2001).
  77. Y. K. Li, D. K. Yang, Y. C. Chen, H. J. Su, J. C. Wu, and Y. W. Chen-Yang, Acta Biomater. 6, 1462 (2010).
  78. M. Koebel, A. Rigacci, and P. Achard, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 63, 315 (2012).
  79. A. J. Hunt, C. A. Jantzen, and W. Cao, in ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., edited by R. S. Graves and D. C. Wysocki (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1991), pp. 455-463.
  80. N. Saad, M. Chaaban, D. Patra, A. Ghanem, and H. El-Rassy, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 292, 109759 (2020).
  81. M. Nuckols, J. Henkener, J. Chao, C. Shaffer, and M. Swiergosz, Proc. Int. Conf. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. - OMAE 2006, (2006).
  82. G. Mishra, N. Mittal, and A. Sharma, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 19371 (2017).
  83. N. Mittal, D. Deva, R. Kumar, and A. Sharma, Carbon N. Y. 93, 492 (2015).
  84. M. F. Bertino, J. F. Hund, G. Zhang, C. Sotiriou-Leventis, A. T. Tokuhiro, and N. Leventis, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 30, 43 (2004).
  85. M. A. B. Meador, S. L. Vivod, L. McCorkle, D. Quade, R. M. Sullivan, L. J. Ghosn, N. Clark, and L. A. Capadona, J. Mater. Chem. 18, 1843 (2008).
  86. Y. Liao, H. Wu, Y. Ding, S. Yin, M. Wang, and A. Cao, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 63, 445 (2012).
  87. B. Yuan, S. Ding, D. Wang, G. Wang, and H. Li, Mater. Lett. 75, 204 (2012).
  88. X. Yang, Y. Sun, D. Shi, and J. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 4830 (2011).
  89. J. L. Mohanan and S. L. Brock, Chem. Mater. 15, 2567 (2003).
  90. G. Guzel Kaya, E. Yilmaz, and H. Deveci, Adv. Powder Technol. 31, 926 (2020).
  91. H. Rocha, U. Lafont, and C. Semprimoschnig, Acta Astronaut. 165, 9 (2019).
  92. W. Gonçalves, J. Morthomas, P. Chantrenne, M. Perez, G. Foray, and C. L. Martin, Acta Mater. 145, 165 (2018).
  93. S. P. Patil, V. G. Parale, H. H. Park, and B. Markert, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 742, 344 (2019). 100. S. P. Patil, A. Rege, M. Itskov, and B. Markert, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 498, 125 (2018). 101. L. D. Gelb, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15792 (2007). 102. S. P. Patil, A. Rege, Sagardas, M. Itskov, and B. Markert, J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 5660 (2017). 103. S. P. Patil, Molecules 24, (2019). 104. Z. Talebi, P. Soltani, N. Habibi, and F. Latifi, Constr. Build. Mater. 220, 76 (2019). 105. (n.d.). 106. (n.d.). 107. E. Strobach, B. Bhatia, S. Yang, L. Zhao, and E. N. Wang, J. Non. Cryst. Solids 462, 72 (2017). 108. (n.d.). 109. S. Zhao, G. Siqueira, S. Drdova, D. Norris, C. Ubert, A. Bonnin, S. Galmarini, M. Ganobjak, Z. Pan, S. Brunner, G. Nyström, J. Wang, M. M. Koebel, and W. J. Malfait, Nature 584, 387 (2020). 110. A. R. A. Talib and M. I. N. Bheekhun, in Struct. Heal. Monit. Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Compos. Hybrid Compos. (Elsevier, 2018), pp. 191-225. 111. C. A. García-González, T. Budtova, L. Durães, C. Erkey, P. Del Gaudio, P. Gurikov, M. Koebel, F. Liebner, M. Neagu, and I. Smirnova, Molecules 24, (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akhter, F., Soomro, S. A., & Inglezakis, V. J.
Affiliations
  • Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (PK)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Akhter, Faheem
  • Soomro, Suhail Ahmed
  • Inglezakis, Vassilis J.
Venue
Journal of Porous Materials
Published
2021-05-14
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1387-1400
ISSN
  • 1380-2224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-4854
OpenAlex
W3162841488
Cited by
131
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Porous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Aerogels and thermal insulation
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
Keywords
silica aerogel, sol-gel synthesis, hybrid composites, porous media, thermal insulation, low thermal conductivity, brittleness, mechanical strength, biomedical applications, aerospace applications, drying methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review