Cited by 40Education Discipline and InequalityYouth Substance Use and School AttendanceBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Results from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion and Antisocial Behavior

Open access
Obsuth, Ingrid, Sutherland, Alex, Cope, Aiden, Pilbeam, Liv, Murray, Aja Louise, Eisner, Manuel·2017·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

School exclusion as a disciplinary measure remains a controversial issue. In spite of numerous attempts to reduce this practice, no solutions with documented effectiveness exist. This article reports results of a cluster-randomized controlled field trial carried out in 36 schools across London. The trial is an independent evaluation of a 12-week-long intervention, Engage in Education-London (EiE-L), delivered by Catch22. The intervention was aimed at students in secondary school who are most at risk of school exclusion. It targeted their social communication and broader social skills with the aim of reducing school exclusions and problem behaviors. The study employed a multi-informant design that included students and teacher reports as well as official records for exclusions and arrests. Data were analyzed through intent-to-treat analyses based on self-reports from 644 students and 685 teacher reports for students who were nominated for the study and for whom data was available at baseline or post-intervention. At baseline data collection the students ranged in age from 12.85 to 15.03, with M = 14.03; 71 % were male and included a number of ethnic minorities, the largest of which was black African/black Caribbean comprising 40 % of the sample. The results suggested a small but statistically significant negative effect on the primary outcome of exclusion and null effects for the secondary outcomes that measured behavioral and socio-emotional outcomes. The study's findings are discussed in terms of the possible reasons for the null effects and negative (iatrogenic) effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-016-0468-4

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obsuth et al. (2017) reported that iatrogenic effects were observable not only for exclusion but also for antisocial behaviour.

    “Results suggest that the iatrogenic effects were observable not only for exclusion but also for the case of antisocial behaviour.”

    From School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Obsuth et al. 2017

    The Discussion reports a potential negative effect on school exclusion, but says there were no significant differences in antisocial behaviour. The Results (Treatment Effects; page not available) show that the antisocial-behaviour estimate pointed in an iatrogenic direction, but it was not statistically significant. Thus, the source supports a harmful directional estimate for antisocial behaviour, not an established iatrogenic effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The evaluation by Obsuth et al. (2017) reported that the intervention resulted in an increase in problematic behaviours.

    “For example, the evaluation by Obsuth et al. (2017) reported that the intervention resulted in an increase in problematic behaviours.”

    From School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Obsuth et al. (2017)

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that students in intervention schools were more likely than controls to self-report a recent school exclusion, suggesting a potential negative effect, but the authors urge caution. It reports no significant differences in antisocial behavior or delinquency. The claim overstates a possible increase in exclusions as an established increase in problematic behaviours caused by the intervention. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Achilles GM McLaughlin MJ Croninger RG Sociocultural correlates of disciplinary exclusion among students with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities in the SEELS national dataset Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2007 15 1 33 45 10.1177/10634266070150010401 · DOI
  2. Aldridge J Ala’i K Assessing students’ views of school climate: Developing and validating the What’s Happening In This School? (WHITS) questionnaire Improving Schools 2013 16 1 47 66 10.1177/1365480212473680 · DOI
  3. Beelmann A Lösel F Child social skills training in developmental crime prevention: Effects on antisocial behavior and social competence Psicothema 2006 18 603 610 17296094
  4. Bernburg JG Krohn MD Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime inearly adulthood Criminology 2003 41 4 1287 1318 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01020.x · DOI
  5. Bishop DC Pankratz MM Hansen WB Albritton J Albritton L Strack J Measuring fidelity and adaptation reliability of an instrument for school-based prevention programs Evaluation and the Health Professions 2014 37 2 231 257 10.1177/0163278713476882 23424155 · DOI
  6. Campbell MK Elbourne DR Altman DG CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomized trials BMJ 2004 328 7441 702 708 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702 15031246 PMC381234 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cécile M Born M Intervention in juvenile delinquency: Danger of iatrogenic effects? Children and Youth Services Review 2009 31 12 1217 1221 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.015 · DOI
  8. Clegg J Stackhouse J Finch K Murphy C Nicholls S Language abilities of secondary age pupils at risk of school exclusion: A preliminary report Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2009 25 1 123 139 10.1177/0265659008098664 · DOI
  9. Day-Vines NL Terriquez V A Strengths-Based approach to promoting prosocial behavior among African American and Latino Students Professional School Counseling 2008 12 2 170 175 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.170 · DOI
  10. Dishion TJ McCord J Poulin F When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior American Psychologist 1999 54 9 755 764 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.755 10510665 · DOI
  11. Dishion TJ Tipsord JM Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development Annual Review of Psychology 2011 62 189 214 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412 19575606 PMC3523739 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In Damon W., & Eisenberg N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 719–788). New York, NY: Wiley.
  13. Dupper DR Theriot MT Craun SW Reducing out-of-school suspensions: Practice guidelines for school social workers Children and Schools 2009 31 6 14 10.1093/cs/31.1.6 · DOI
  14. Eisner M Ribeaud D Conducting a criminological survey in a culturally diverse context: Lessons from the Zurich Project on the Social Development of Children European Journal of Criminology 2007 4 3 271 298 10.1177/1477370807077183 · DOI
  15. Gazeley, L. (2010). The role of school exclusion processes in the re-production of social and educational disadvantage. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(3), 293–309.
  16. Gazeley L Marrable T Brown C Boddy J Contextualising inequalities in rates of school exclusion in English schools: Beneath the ‘Tip of the Ice-Berg’ British Journal of Educational Studies 2015 63 4 487 504 10.1080/00071005.2015.1070790 · DOI
  17. Gifford-Smith M Dodge KA Dishion TJ McCord J Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2005 33 3 255 265 10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7 15957555 PMC2747364 · DOI
  18. Gilmour J Hill B Place M Skuse DH Social communication deficits in conduct disorder: A clinical and community survey Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2004 45 5 967 978 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00289.x 15225339 · DOI
  19. Horner RH Sugai G School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social Importance Behavior Analysis in Practice 2015 8 1 80 85 10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4 27703887 PMC5048248 · DOI
  20. Hughes DM Turkstra LS Wulfeck BB Parent and self-ratings of executive function in adolescents with specific language impairment International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2009 44 6 901 916 19105067
  21. Kim, B. E., Gloppen, K. M., Rhew, I. C., Oesterle, S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2015). Effects of the Communities That Care prevention system on youth reports of protective factors. Prevention Science,16(5), 652–662. PMC4418962 25366931
  22. Lanskey C Up or down and out? A systemic analysis of young people’s educational pathways in the youth justice system in England and Wales International Journal of Inclusive Education 2015 19 6 568 582 10.1080/13603116.2014.961675 · DOI
  23. Larsen RW Angus RM Adolescents’ development of skills for agency in youth programs: Learning to think strategically Child Development 2011 82 277 294 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01555.x 21291442 · DOI
  24. Layard R Clark AE Cornaglia F Powdthavee N Vernoit J What predicts a successful Life? A life-course model of well-being The Economic Journal 2014 124 580 F720 F738 10.1111/ecoj.12170 25422527 PMC4240315 · DOI
  25. Little RJ Rubin DB Statistical analysis with missing data 1987 New York Wiley
  26. McCluskey G Riddell S Weedon E Children’s rights, school exclusion and alternative educational provision International Journal of Inclusive Education 2015 19 6 595 607 10.1080/13603116.2014.961677 · DOI
  27. McCord J Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2003 587 1 16 30 10.1177/0002716202250781 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Menting B Van Lier PA Koot HM Pardini D Loeber R Cognitive impulsivity and the development of delinquency from late childhood to early adulthood: Moderating effects of parenting behavior and peer relationships Development and psychopathology 2004 28 1 167 183 10.1017/S095457941500036X 25997462 · DOI
  29. Moffitt, T.E. & Scott, S. (2009). Conduct disorders of childhood and adolescence. In M. Rutter, D. V. M. Bishop, D. S. Pine, S. Scott, J. Stevenson, E. Taylor, & A. Thapar (Eds.), Rutter’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (5th ed., pp. 543–564). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  30. Moon G Barnett R Pearce J Ethnic spatial segregation and tobacco consumption: a multilevel repeated cross-sectional analysis of smoking prevalence in urban New Zealand, 1981-1996 Environment and Planning A 2010 42 2 469 486 10.1068/a41292 · DOI
  31. Moretti MM Peled M Adolescent-parent attachment: Bonds that support healthy development Paediatrics & Child Health 2004 9 8 551 561 19680483 PMC2724162
  32. Munn P Lloyd G Exclusion and excluded pupils British Educational Research Journal 2005 31 2 205 221 10.1080/0141192052000340215 · DOI
  33. Muthén BO Satorra A Complex sample data in structural equation modeling Sociological Methodology 1995 25 267 316 10.2307/271070 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Nation M Crusto C Wandersman A Kumpfer KL Seybolt D Davino K What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs American Psychologist 2003 58 6–7 449 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.449 12971191 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Noguera PA Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices Theory into Practice 2003 42 4 341 350 10.1207/s15430421tip4204_12 · DOI
  36. Obsuth, I., Cope, A., Sutherland, A., Pilbeam, L., Murray, A. L., & Eisner, M. (in press). London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Exploring negative and null effects of a cluster-randomised school-intervention to reduce school exclusion – findings from protocol-based subgroup analyses. PLoS ONE PMC4821581 27045953
  37. OECD (2015). Skills for social progress: The power of social and emotional skills. OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, 10.1787/9789264226159-en · DOI
  38. Olweus D Bullying at school: Knowledge base and an effective intervention programa Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1996 794 1 265 276 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb32527.x · DOI
  39. Osler A Hill J Exclusion from school and racial equality: An examination of government proposals in the light of recent research evidence Cambridge Journal of Education 1999 29 1 33 62 10.1080/0305764990290104 · DOI
  40. Oudekerk BA Allen JP Hessel ET Molloy LE The cascading development of autonomy and relatedness from adolescence to adulthood Child Development 2015 86 2 472 485 10.1111/cdev.12313 25345623 PMC4376599 · DOI
  41. Perry BL Morris EW Suspending progress collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools American Sociological Review 2014 76 6 1067 1087 10.1177/0003122414556308 · DOI
  42. Piquero AR Gomez-Smith Z Langton L Discerning unfairness where others may not: Low self-control and unfair sanction perceptions Criminology 2004 42 3 699 734 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00534.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pritchard C Williams R A three-year comparative longitudinal study of a school-based social work family service to reduce truancy, delinquency and school exclusions The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 2001 23 1 23 43 10.1080/01418030121650 · DOI
  44. Raudenbush SW Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials Psychological Methods 1997 2 2 173185 10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.173 10937329 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Rothwell PM Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation The Lancet 2005 365 9454 176 186 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5 15639301 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Saghaei M Saghaei S Implementation of an open-source customizable minimization program for allocation of patients to parallel groups in clinical trials Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering 2011 04 11 734 739 10.4236/jbise.2011.411090 · DOI
  47. Sandler I Wolchik SA Cruden G Mahrer NE Ahn S Brincks A Brown CH Overview of meta-analyses of the prevention of mental health, substance use and conduct problems Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2014 10 243 273 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185524 24471372 PMC3984908 · DOI
  48. Schulz KF Grimes DA Multiplicity in randomized trials I: Endpoints and treatments The Lancet 2005 365 9470 1591 1595 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6 15866314 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Silva JLD Cianflone ARL Bazon MR School bonding of adolescent offenders Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 2016 26 63 91 100 10.1590/1982-43272663201611 · DOI
  50. Sørlie MA Ogden T School-Wide Positive Behavior Support–Norway: Impacts on problem behavior and classroom climate International Journal of School & Educational Psychology 2015 3 3 202 217 10.1080/21683603.2015.1060912 · DOI
  51. Steinberg, L. (2015). The neural underpinnings of adolescent risk-taking: The roles of reward-seeking, impulse control, and peers. In G. Oettingen, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Self-regulation in adolescence (pp. 173–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Taves DR The use of minimization in clinical trials Contemporary clinical trials 2010 31 2 180 184 10.1016/j.cct.2009.12.005 20060500 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Theimann M School as a space of socialization and prevention European Journal of Criminology 2016 13 1 67 91 10.1177/1477370815597254 · DOI
  54. Tolan P Gorman-Smith D Henry D Supporting families in a high-risk setting: proximal effects of the SAFEChildren preventive intervention Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004 72 5 855 10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.855 15482043 · DOI
  55. Tremblay RE Loeber R Gagnon C Charlebois P Larivee S LeBlanc M Disruptive boys with stable and unstable high fighting behavior patterns during junior elementary school Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1991 19 3 285 300 10.1007/BF00911232 1865046 · DOI
  56. Tymms P Coe R Celebration of the success of distributed research with schools: The CEM Centre, Durham British Educational Research Journal 2003 29 5 639 667 10.1080/0141192032000133686 · DOI
  57. Welsh BC Rocque M When crime prevention harms: A review of systematic reviews Journal of Experimental Criminology 2014 10 3 245 266 10.1007/s11292-014-9199-2 · DOI
  58. Wikström, P. O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  59. Wilson SJ Lipsey MW Derzon JH The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2003 71 1 136 149 10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.136 12602434 · DOI
  60. Zane SN Welsh BC Zimmerman GM Examining the iatrogenic effects of the Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study: Existing explanations and new appraisals British Journal of Criminology 2016 56 1 141 160 10.1093/bjc/azv033 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obsuth, I., Sutherland, A., Cope, A., Pilbeam, L., Murray, A. L., & Eisner, M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Obsuth, Ingrid
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2016-03-23
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
538-557
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2297381063
Cited by
40
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (VS/2012/0345)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
school exclusion, antisocial behavior, social skills intervention, social communication, high school students, at-risk students, student discipline, social-emotional outcomes, iatrogenic disease, multi-informant assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, London, Male, Schools, Students, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review