Cited by 12Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish Ecology and Management StudiesEcology and biodiversity studies

Application of the diminishing returns concept in the hydroecologic restoration of riverscapes

Diefenderfer, Heida L., Johnson, Gary E., Skalski, John R., Breithaupt, Stephen A., Coleman, André M.·2012·Landscape Ecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-012-9713-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The density of restoration projects can produce space-crowding effects through ecosystem processes such as water flow.

    “There are theoretical limits on the maximum restoration benefit for a given geographic area, and the density of restoration projects can produce space-crowding effects through ecosystem processes (eg water flow; Diefenderfer et al. 2012).”

    From Applying cumulative effects to strategically advance large‐scale ecosystem restoration (2021) · cites this paper as Diefenderfer et al. 2012

  • Detection of time- or space-crowding effects requires robust statistical modeling and experimental designs.

    “The detection of time-or space-crowding effects requires robust statistical modeling and experimental designs (Diefenderfer et al. 2012; Pennino et al. 2016).”

    From Applying cumulative effects to strategically advance large‐scale ecosystem restoration (2021) · cites this paper as Diefenderfer et al. 2012

  • The incremental return of wetted area per dike breach diminished with additional breaches once a peak of 28 ha wetted area per breach was reached when 26% (11 of 42) of channels were breached.

    “(2) the incremental return of wetted area per breach diminished with additional breaches once a peak at 28 ha wetted area per breach was reached when 26% (11 of 42) of the channels were breached;”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Diefenderfer et al. 2012

  • Multiple dike breaches produced a synergistic increase in wetted floodplain area with low numbers of breaches, evidenced by a slope greater than 1 between proportion of area wetted and proportion of channels opened.

    “It also revealed three effects of multiple dike breaches: (1) the slope greater than 1 between the proportion of area wetted and the proportion of channels opened evidenced a synergistic increase in wetted floodplain area with low numbers of breaches;”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Diefenderfer et al. 2012

  • The spatial configuration of dike breaches affected wetted floodplain area: upstream breaches yielded 2% and midstream breaches 63% of the wetted area produced by downstream breaches.

    “(3) the spatial configuration of dike breaches affected the amount of wetted floodplain area producedupstream breaches yielded 2% and midstream breaches 63% of the wetted area produced by downstream breaches (Diefenderfer et al. 2012).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Diefenderfer et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Skalski, J. R., Breithaupt, S. A., & Coleman, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Diefenderfer, Heida L.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Published
2012-03-17
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
671-682
ISSN
  • 0921-2973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9761
OpenAlex
W1969612331
Cited by
12
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Landscape Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
diminishing returns, river restoration, dike breach, floodplain inundation, Columbia River, return on investment, wetland restoration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review