CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling using a 25-year remote sensing time series

Bishop-Taylor, Robbi, Tulbure, Mirela G., Broich, Mark·2018·Landscape Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10980-018-0624-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-018-0624-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanics of creating a dynamic representation can include adding or removing habitat nodes, as was done in a set of 99 time-steps depicting changes over 25 years of seasonal droughts and floods in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin.

    “The mechanics of creating a dynamic representation can also include adding or removing habitat nodes from the system, as was done in a set of 99 time-steps depicting changes over 25 years of seasonal droughts and floods in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin [61].”

    From Circuitscape in julia: empowering dynamic approaches to connectivity assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [61]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Albanese G, Haukos DA (2017) A network model framework for prioritizing wetland conservation in the Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 32:115–130 · DOI
  2. Avon C, Bergès L (2016) Prioritization of habitat patches for landscape connectivity conservation differs between least-cost and resistance distances. Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0336-8 · DOI
  3. Ballinger A, Mac Nally RC (2006) The landscape context of flooding in the Murray–Darling Basin. Adv Ecol Res 39:85–105 · DOI
  4. Bino G, Kingsford RT, Brandis K (2016) Australia’s wetlands—learning from the past to manage for the future. Pacific Conserv Biol 22:116–129 · DOI
  5. Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2015) Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin. Landscape Ecol 30:2045–2065 · DOI
  6. Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017b) Surface water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region. Ecol Appl 27:1124–1137 · DOI
  7. Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017c) Impact of hydroclimatic variability on regional-scale landscape connectivity across a dynamic dryland region. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.029 · DOI
  8. Bodin Ö, Norberg J (2006) A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol 22:31–44 · DOI
  9. Butts CT (2009) Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325:414–416 · DOI
  10. Carroll C, Wang T, Roberts DR, Michalak JL, Lawler JJ, Nielsen SE, Stralberg D, Wang T (2017) Scale-dependent complementarity of climatic velocity and environmental diversity for identifying priority areas for conservation under climate change. Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13679 · DOI
  11. Castorani MCN, Reed DC, Alberto F, Bell TW, Simons RD, Cavanaugh KC, Raimondi PT (2015) Connectivity structures local population dynamics: a long-term empirical test in a large metapopulation system. Ecology 96:3141–3152 · DOI
  12. Cavanaugh KC, Siegel DA, Raimondi PT, Alberto F (2014) Patch definition in metapopulation analysis: a graph theory approach to solve the mega-patch problem. Ecology 95:316–328 · DOI
  13. Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Salicrup DR, Granados EL (2014) Identifying potential conservation areas in the Cuitzeo Lake basin, Mexico by multitemporal analysis of landscape connectivity. J Nat Conserv 22:424–435 · DOI
  14. Davis J, O’Grady AP, Dale A, Arthington AH, Gell PA, Driver PD, Capon SJ (2015) When trends intersect: the challenge of protecting freshwater ecosystems under multiple land use and hydrological intensification scenarios. Sci Total Environ 534:65–78 · DOI
  15. Drake JC, Griffis-Kyle KL, McIntyre NE (2017) Graph theory as an invasive species management tool: case study in the Sonoran Desert. Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0539-2 · DOI
  16. Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S, Colin O, Fernandez V, Gascon F, Meygret A (2012) Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens Environ 120:25–36 · DOI
  17. Estrada E, Bodin Ö (2008) Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecol Appl 18:1810–1825 · DOI
  18. Fagan ME, DeFries RS, Sesnie SE, Arroyo-Mora JP, Chazdon RL (2016) Targeted reforestation could reverse declines in connectivity for understory birds in a tropical habitat corridor. Ecol Appl 26:1456–1474 · DOI
  19. Fortin M-J, James PMA, MacKenzie A, Melles SJ, Rayfield B (2012) Spatial statistics, spatial regression, and graph theory in ecology. Spat Stat 1:100–109 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fortuna MA, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Bascompte J (2006) Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1429–1434 · DOI
  21. Heimhuber V, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2016) Modeling 25 years of spatio-temporal surface water and inundation dynamics on large river basin scale using time series of Earth observation data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:2227–2250 · DOI
  22. Heimhuber V, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2017) Modeling multidecadal surface water inundation dynamics and key drivers on large river basin scale using multiple time series of Earth-observation and river flow data. Water Resour Res 20:2227–2250
  23. Hernández A, Miranda M, Arellano EC, Saura S, Ovalle C (2015) Landscape dynamics and their effect on the functional connectivity of a Mediterranean landscape in Chile. Ecol Indic 48:198–206 · DOI
  24. Kingsford RT (2000) Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol 25:109–127 · DOI
  25. Kool JT, Moilanen A, Treml EA (2012) Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives. Landscape Ecol 28:165–185 · DOI
  26. Leblanc M, Tweed S, Van Dijk A, Timbal B (2012) A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray–Darling Basin. Glob Planet Change 80–81:226–246 · DOI
  27. Littlefield CE, McRae BH, Michalak J, Lawler JJ, Carroll C (2017) Connecting today’s climates to future analogs to facilitate species movement under climate change. Conserv Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12938 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lloyd MW, Widmeyer PA, Neel MC (2016) Temporal variability in potential connectivity of Vallisneria americana in the Chesapeake Bay. Landscape Ecol 31:2307–2321 · DOI
  29. Locher-Krause KE, Volk M, Waske B, Thonfeld F, Lautenbach S (2017) Expanding temporal resolution in landscape transformations: insights from a landsat-based case study in Southern Chile. Ecol Indic 75:132–144 · DOI
  30. Lymburner L, Tan P, Mueller N, Thackway R, Lewis A, Thankappan M, Senarath U (2010) The National Dynamic Land Cover Dataset. National Earth Observation Group, Geoscience Australia, Canberra
  31. Martensen AC, Saura S, Fortin M-J (2017) Spatio-temporal connectivity: assessing the amount of reachable habitat in dynamic landscapes. Methods Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12426 · DOI
  32. McIntyre NE, Wright CK, Swain S, Hayhoe K, Liu G, Schwartz FW, Henebry GM (2014) Climate forcing of wetland landscape connectivity in the Great Plains. Front Ecol Environ 12:59–64 · DOI
  33. McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19885–19890 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Minor ES, Urban DL (2008) A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:297–307 · DOI
  35. Morán-Ordóñez A, Pavlova A, Pinder AM, Sim L, Sunnucks P, Thompson RM, Davis J (2015) Aquatic communities in arid landscapes: local conditions, dispersal traits and landscape configuration determine local biodiversity. Divers Distrib 21:1230–1241 · DOI
  36. Mui AB, Caverhill B, Johnson B, Fortin MJ, He Y (2017) Using multiple metrics to estimate seasonal landscape connectivity for Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in a fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol 32:531–546 · DOI
  37. Murphy MA, Dezzani R, Pilliod DS, Storfer A (2010) Landscape genetics of high mountain frog metapopulations. Mol Ecol 19:3634–3649 · DOI
  38. Murphy AL, Pavlova A, Thompson R, Davis J, Sunnucks P (2015) Swimming through sand: connectivity of aquatic fauna in deserts. Ecol Evol 5:5252–5264 · DOI
  39. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256 · DOI · Paper page
  40. O’Farrill G, Schampaert KG, Rayfield B, Bodin Ö, Calme S, Sengupta R, Gonzalez A (2014) The potential connectivity of waterhole networks and the effectiveness of a protected area under various drought scenarios. PLoS ONE 9:e95049 · DOI
  41. Page K, Read A, Frazier P, Mount N (2005) The effect of altered flow regime on the frequency and duration of bankfull discharge: Murrumbidgee River, Australia. River Res Appl 578:567–578 · DOI
  42. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S (2007) Impact of spatial scale on the identification of critical habitat patches for the maintenance of landscape connectivity. Landsc Urban Plan 83:176–186 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Piquer-Rodríguez M, Torella S, Gavier-Pizarro G, Volante J, Somma D, Ginzburg R, Kuemmerle T (2015) Effects of past and future land conversions on forest connectivity in the Argentine Chaco. Landscape Ecol 30:817–833 · DOI
  44. Pittock B, Abbs D, Suppiah R, Jones R (2006) Climatic background to past and future floods in Australia. Adv Ecol Res 39:13–39 · DOI
  45. Pittock J, Finlayson CM (2011) Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Mar Freshw Res 62:232 · DOI
  46. Puckridge JT, Sheldon F, Walker KF, Boulton A (1988) Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers. Mar Freshw Res 49:55–72 · DOI
  47. Roe JH, Brinton AC, Georges A (2009) Temporal and spatial variation in landscape connectivity for a freshwater turtle in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Ecol Appl 19:1288–1299 · DOI
  48. Rogers K, Ralph TJ (2010) Floodplain wetlands of the Murray–Darling Basin and their freshwater biota. In: Rogers K, Ralph TJ (eds) Floodplain wetl. Biota murray–darling basin water habitat requirements. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 1–16 · DOI
  49. Rubio L, Bodin Ö, Brotons L, Saura S (2014) Connectivity conservation priorities for individual patches evaluated in the present landscape: how durable and effective are they in the long term? Ecography (Cop) 38:782–791 · DOI
  50. Ruiz L, Parikh N, Heintzman LJ, Collins SD, Starr SM, Wright CK, McIntyre NE (2014) Dynamic connectivity of temporary wetlands in the southern Great Plains. Landscape Ecol 29:507–516 · DOI
  51. Saunders MI, Brown CJ, Foley MM, Febria CM, Albright R, Mehling MG, Burfeind DD (2015) Human impacts on connectivity in marine and freshwater ecosystems assessed using graph theory: a review. Mar Freshw Res 67:277–290 · DOI
  52. Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103 · DOI
  53. Schaffer-Smith D, Swenson JJ, Barbaree B, Reiter ME (2017) Three decades of Landsat-derived spring surface water dynamics in an agricultural wetland mosaic; Implications for migratory shorebirds. Remote Sens Environ 193:180–192 · DOI
  54. Schick RS, Lindley ST (2007) Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network. J Appl Ecol 44:1116–1126 · DOI
  55. Schmit C, Rounsevell MDA, La Jeunesse I (2006) The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis. Environ Sci Policy 9:174–188 · DOI
  56. Shah VB, McRae BH (2008) Circuitscape: a tool for landscape ecology. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J (eds) In: Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008). Pasadena, CA, pp 62–66
  57. Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography (Cop) 28:110–128 · DOI
  58. Tulbure MG, Broich M (2013) Spatiotemporal dynamic of surface water bodies using Landsat time-series data from 1999 to 2011. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 79:44–52 · DOI
  59. Tulbure MG, Broich M, Stehman SV, Kommareddy A (2016) Surface water extent dynamics from three decades of seasonally continuous Landsat time series at subcontinental scale in a semi-arid region. Remote Sens Environ 178:142–157 · DOI
  60. Tulbure MG, Kininmonth SJ, Broich M (2014) Spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water networks across a global biodiversity hotspot—implications for conservation. Environ Res Lett 9:114012 · DOI
  61. Urban DL, Keitt TH (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218 · DOI
  62. Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Vanderhoof MK, Alexander LC, Todd MJ (2015) Temporal and spatial patterns of wetland extent influence variability of surface water connectivity in the Prairie Pothole Region, United States. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0290-5 · DOI
  64. Verburg PH, Neumann K, Nol L (2011) Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Glob Change Biol 17:974–989 · DOI
  65. Watts AG, Schlichting P, Billerman S, Jesmer B, Micheletti S, Fortin MJ, Murphy MA (2015) How spatio-temporal habitat connectivity affects amphibian genetic structure. Front Genet 6:1–13 · DOI
  66. Wright CK (2010) Spatiotemporal dynamics of prairie wetland networks: power-law scaling and implications for conservation planning. Ecology 91:1924–1930. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0865.1 · DOI
  67. Zeigler SL, Fagan WF (2014) Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world. Mov Ecol 2:1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bishop-Taylor, R., Tulbure, M. G., & Broich, M.
ORCID
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-02-26
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
625-640
ISSN
  • 0921-2973
  • 1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-018-0624-1
Cited by
64
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Australian Research Council (DE140101608)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review