Cited by 47Folate and B Vitamins ResearchMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

Health Care Provider Knowledge and Practices Regarding Folic Acid, United States, 2002–2003

Open access
Williams, Jennifer L., Abelman, Stephen M., Fassett, Elizabeth M., Stone, Cheryl E., Petrini, Joann R., Damus, Karla, Mulinare, Joseph·2006·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess health care providers (HCP) knowledge and practices regarding folic acid (FA) use for neural tube defect (NTD) prevention. METHODS: Two identical surveys were conducted among 611 obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) and family/general physicians (FAM/GENs) (2002), and 500 physician assistants (PAs), nurse practitioners (NPs), certified nurse midwives (CNMs), and registered nurses (2003) to ascertain knowledge and practices regarding FA. For analysis, T-tests, univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used. RESULTS: Universally, providers knew that FA prevents birth defects. Over 88% knew when a woman should start taking folic acid for the prevention of NTDs; and over 85% knew FA supplementation beyond what is available in the diet is necessary. However, only half knew that 50% of all pregnancies in the United States are unplanned. Women heard information about multivitamins or FA most often during well woman visits in obstetrical/gynecology (ob/gyn) practice settings (65%), and about 50% of the time during well woman visits in family/general (fam/gen) practice settings and 50% of the time at gynecology visits (both settings). Among all providers, 42% did not know the correct FA dosage (400 mug daily). HCPs taking multivitamins were more than twice as likely to recommend multivitamins to their patients (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.27 95%, Confidence Interval [CI] 1.75-2.94). HCPs with lower income clients (OR 1.49, CI 1.22-1.81) and HCPs with practices having more than 10% minorities (OR 1.46, CI 1.11-1.92) were more likely to recommend supplements. NPs in ob/gyn settings were most likely and FAM/GENs were least likely to recommend supplements (OR 3.06, CL 1.36-6.90 and OR 0.64, CL 0.45-0.90 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about birth defects and the necessity of supplemental FA was high. Increasing knowledge about unintended pregnancy rates and correct dosages of FA is needed. The strongest predictor for recommending the use of FA supplements was whether the provider took a multivitamin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-006-0088-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most women recognize the value of optimizing health before pregnancy and most doctors consider preconception care important, yet few obstetrician-gynecologists or family physicians deliver comprehensive preconception care.

    “Although most women understand the importance of optimizing their health before pregnancy and most physicians think PCC is important, few obstetricians/gynecologists or family physicians provide comprehensive PCC to their patients.9, 10”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intake: Folate, other B vitamins, and choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.
  2. United States Food and Drug Administration. Food standards. Fed Regist 1996;61:8781-97.
  3. Frank E, Rothenberg R, Lewis C, Belodoff B. Correlates of physi- cians' prevention-related practices. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:359- 67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. L., Abelman, S. M., Fassett, E. M., Stone, C. E., Petrini, J. R., Damus, K., & Mulinare, J.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • March of Dimes (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Jennifer L.
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2006-05-24
Volume
10
Issue
S1
Pages
67-72
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2007968444
Cited by
47
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Rural Development Administration
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
folic acid supplementation, neural tube defects, prenatal care, health care provider knowledge, provider practices, unintended pregnancy, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, patient-provider communication, health disparities, low-income patients, racial and ethnic minorities, United States
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Family Practice, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Tube Defects, Obstetrics, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review