Cited by 56Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and ContraceptionGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Where is the “W”oman in MCH?

Open access
Atrash, Hani, Jack, Brian W., Johnson, Kay, Coonrod, Dean V., Moos, Merry-K., Stubblefield, Phillip G., Cefalo, Robert, Damus, Karla +1 more·2008·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Scientific evidence indicates that improving a woman's health before pregnancy will improve pregnancy outcomes. However, for many years, our efforts have focused primarily on prenatal care and on caring for infants after birth. The concept of preconception care has been identified repeatedly as a priority for improving maternal and infant health. Preconception care is not something new that is being added to the already overburdened healthcare provider, but it is a part of routine primary care for women of reproductive age. Many opportunities exist for preconception intervention, and much of preconception care involves merely the provider reframing his or her thinking, counseling, and decisions in light of the reproductive plans and sexual and contraceptive practices of the patient. With existing scientific evidence that improving the health of "W"omen will improve the health of mothers and children, we must focus on improving the health of "W"omen before pregnancy and put the "W" in Maternal and Child Health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.059

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Jack B, Culpepper L. Preconception care. In: Merkatz IR, Thompson JE, Mullen PD, Gold- enberg RL, editors. New perspectives on pre- natal care. New York: Elsevier; 1990: 69-88.
  2. US Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000: midcourse review and 1995 revisions. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gy- necologists Preconception Work Group. The importance of preconception care in the contin- uum of women's health care. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:665-6.
  4. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. March of Dimes updates: is early prenatal care too late? Contemp Obstet Gynecol 2002;12: 54-72.
  5. Moos MK. Preconceptional health promo- tion: opportunities abound. Matern Child Health J 2002;6:71-3.
  6. Moos MK. Preconceptional health promo- tion: progress in changing a prevention para- digm. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2004;18:2-13.
  7. Practice parameter: management issues for women with epilepsy (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neu- rology 1998;51:944-8.
  8. Matern Child Health J 2006;10:S67-72.
  9. Jack BW, Culpepper L, Babcock J, Kogan M, Wesimiller D. How effectively are interven- tions initiated after preconception risk assess- ment at the time of a negative pregnancy test? A randomized controlled trial. J Fam Pract 1998;47:33-8.
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Preven- tion. Recommendations for improving precon- ception health and health care: United States: a report of the CC/ATSDR Preconception Care Workgroup and the Select Panel on Precon- ception Care. MMWR, Morb Mortal Weekly Rep, 2006;55:1-23.
  11. Bernstein PS, Sanghvi T, Merkatz IR. Im- proving preconception care. J Reprod Med 2000;45:546-52.
  12. Heider AL, Kuller JA, Strauss RA,. Wells SR. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a review of the lit- erature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:526-31.
  13. Jones AM, Howitt Q. Eisenmenger syn- drome in pregnancy. BMJ 1965;1:1627-31.
  14. Clancy CM, Massion CT. American wom- en's health care: a patchwork quilt with gaps. JAMA 1992;268:1918-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atrash, H., Jack, B. W., Johnson, K., Coonrod, D. V., Moos, M.-K., Stubblefield, P. G., Cefalo, R., Damus, K., & Reddy, U. M.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Maricopa Medical Center (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
199
Issue
6
Pages
S259-S265
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074448198
Cited by
56
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
preconception care, maternal and child health, women's health, women of reproductive age, primary care, pregnancy outcomes, contraceptive counseling, reproductive planning, maternal health
MeSH terms
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Child, Child Welfare, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Welfare, Pregnancy, United States, Women's Health, Preconception Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review