The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The purpose of this article is to illustrate and discuss the impact the 2019 novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on the delivery of obstetric care, including a discussion on the preexisting barriers, prenatal framework and need for transition to telehealth.Description The COVID-19 was first detected in China in December of 2019 and by March 2020 spread to the United States. As this virus has been associated with severe illness, it poses a threat to vulnerable populations-including pregnant women. The obstetric population already faces multiple barriers to receiving quality healthcare due to personal, environmental and economic barriers, now challenged with the additional risks of COVID-19 exposure and limited care in times much defined by social distancing.Assessment The current prenatal care framework requires patients to attend multiple in-office prenatal visits that can exponentially multiply depending on maternal and fetal comorbidities. To decrease the rate of transmission of the COVID-19 and limit exposure to patients, providers in Hillsborough County, Florida (and nationwide) are rapidly transitioning to telehealth. The use of a virtual care model allows providers to reduce in-person visits and incorporate virtual visits into the schedule of prenatal care.Conclusion Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, implementation of telehealth and telehealth have become crucial to ensure the safe and effective delivery of obstetric care. This implementation is one that will continue to require attention to planning, procedures and processes, and thoughtful evaluation to ensure the sustainability of telehealth and telehealth post COVID-19 pandemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Third is the article “Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond” [47], published in the Maternal and Child health Journal (Springer) in 2020 by an American research team”
From Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019
Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001017 · Cited by 28,244
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States
Holshue, M. L., DeBolt, C., Lindquist, S., Lofy, K. H., Wiesman, J., Bruce, H., Spitters, C., Ericson, K., Wilkerson, S., Tural, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001191 · Cited by 6,030
Chen, H., Guo, J., Wang, C., Luo, F., Yu, X. B., Zhang, W., Li, J., Zhao, D., Xu, D., Gong, Q., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30360-3 · Cited by 4,029
Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
(1969) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1969.03160300092054 · Cited by 1,451
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know
Rasmussen, S. A., Smulian, J. C., Lednicky, J. A., Wen, T. S.-T., & Jamieson, D. J. (2020) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017 · Cited by 1,306
Keith, R. E., Crosson, J. C., O’Malley, A. S., Cromp, D., & Taylor, E. F. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7 · Cited by 710
Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Krupinski, E. A., & Grigsby, J. (2011) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0103 · Cited by 492
Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1093/phr/116.4.306 · Cited by 418
Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction
Trebble, T. M., Hansi, N., Hydes, T., Smith, M. A., & Baker, M. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4078 · Cited by 390
Michie, S., Thomas, J., Johnston, M., Aonghusa, P. M., Shawe-Taylor, J. S., Kelly, M. P., Deleris, L. A., Finnerty, A. N., Marques, M. M., Norris, E., et al. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0641-5 · Cited by 326
Complex Calculations: How Drug Use During Pregnancy Becomes a Barrier to Prenatal Care
Roberts, S. C. M., & Pies, C. A. (2010) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-010-0594-7 · Cited by 279
(2016) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001406 · Cited by 272
Khan, A. A.-M., & Bhardwaj, S. M. (1994) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/016327879401700104 · Cited by 223
Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring
Butler Tobah, Y. S., LeBlanc, A., Branda, M. E., Inselman, J. W., Morris, M. A., Ridgeway, J. L., Finnie, D. M., Theiler, R., Torbenson, V. E., Brodrick, E. M., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.034 · Cited by 212
An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform
McCarthy, S., O’Raghallaigh, P., Woodworth, S., Lim, Y. L., Kenny, L. C., & Adam, F. (2016) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2016.1187394 · Cited by 209
Migrant Women’s Utilization of Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review
Heaman, M. I., Bayrampour, H., Kingston, D. E., Blondel, B., Gissler, M., Roth, C., Alexander, S., & Gagnon, A. J. (2012) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-012-1058-z · Cited by 168
Heaman, M. I., Sword, W. A., Elliott, L. J., MOFFATT, M. E. K., Helewa, M. E., Morris, H., Gregory, P., Tjaden, L., & Cook, C. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0431-5 · Cited by 142
Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Obstetric Care
Pflugeisen, B. M., & Mou, J. (2017) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2284-1 · Cited by 130
Braveman, P. (2000) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00780-8 · Cited by 107
Luo, C., Yao, L., Zhang, L., Yao, M., Chen, X., Wang, Q., & Shen, H. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4583 · Cited by 100
Time of Pregnancy Recognition and Prenatal Care Use: A Population‐based Study in the United States
Ayoola, A. B., Nettleman, M. D., Stommel, M., & Canady, R. B. (2010) · Birth · doi:10.1111/j.1523-536x.2009.00376.x · Cited by 99
Mazul, M. C., Ward, T. C. S., & Ngui, E. M. (2016) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-015-0204-x · Cited by 92
Implementing Telehealth in Practice
(2020) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003671 · Cited by 80
Patient Preferences for Prenatal and Postpartum Care Delivery
Peahl, A. F., Novara, A., Heisler, M., Dalton, V. K., Moniz, M. H., & Smith, R. D. (2020) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003731 · Cited by 79
The evaluation of medical care programs.
Donabedian, A. (1968) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 75
Intimate Partner Violence and Utilization of Prenatal Care in the United States
Cha, S., & Masho, S. W. (2013) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260513505711 · Cited by 74
Evaluation Framework for Telemedicine Using the Logical Framework Approach and a Fishbone Diagram
Chang, H. (2015) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.230 · Cited by 74
Barriers to prenatal care among Black women of low socioeconomic status.
Daniels, P. V., Noe, G. F., & Mayberry, R. M. (2006) · PubMed · doi:10.5555/ajhb.2006.30.2.188 · Cited by 68
OB Nest: Reimagining Low-Risk Prenatal Care
de Mooij, M. M., Hodny, R. L., O'Neil, D. A., Gardner, M. R., Beaver, M., Brown, A. T., Barry, B. A., Ross, L. M., Jasik, A. J., Nesbitt, K. M., et al. (2018) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.022 · Cited by 68
Right-Sizing Prenatal Care to Meet Patients' Needs and Improve Maternity Care Value
Peahl, A. F., Gourevitch, R. A., Luo, E. M., Fryer, K. E., Moniz, M. H., Dalton, V. K., Fendrick, A. M., & Shah, N. T. (2020) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003820 · Cited by 65
Self-citationBarriers to Prenatal Care Among Black Women of Low Socioeconomic Status
Daniels, P. V., Noe, G. F., & Mayberry, R. M. (2006) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.30.2.8 · Cited by 63
PERCEIVED BARRIERS to Prenatal Care Services
Beckmann, C. A., Buford, T. A., & Witt, J. B. (2000) · MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing · doi:10.1097/00005721-200001000-00009 · Cited by 45
A Framework for Telehealth Program Evaluation
Nepal, ., Li, J., Jang‐Jaccard, J., & Alem, L. (2014) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0093 · Cited by 35
Dyk, L. V., & Cornelius, S. L. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/56116 · Cited by 30
Access Barriers to Prenatal Care in Emerging Adult Latinas
Torres, R. (2016) · Hispanic Health Care International · doi:10.1177/1540415316631504 · Cited by 21
The Motivation‐Facilitation Theory of Prenatal Care Access
Phillippi, J. C., & Roman, M. W. (2013) · Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health · doi:10.1111/jmwh.12041 · Cited by 17
Johnson, A. A., Wesley, B. D., El‐Khorazaty, M. N., Utter, J. M., Bhaskar, B., Hatcher, B. J., Milligan, R. A., Wingrove, B. K., Richards, L. N., Rodan, M. F., et al. (2011) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-011-0864-z · Cited by 17
Li, X., Li, A. J., & Du, B. (2021) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2021.102468 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Changes in Access to Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review
Pujolar-Díaz, G., Oliver-Anglès, A., Vargas, Í., & Vázquez, M. L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031749 · Cited by 317
Farrell, R. M., Collart, C., Craighead, C., Pierce, M., Chien, E. K., Frankel, R., Edmonds, B. T., Perni, U. C., Coleridge, M. B., Ranzini, A. C., et al. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/32791 · Cited by 198
Galle, A., Semaan, A. T., Huysmans, E., Audet, C., Asefa, A., Delvaux, T., Afolabi, B. B., Ayadi, A. M. E., & Beňová, L. (2021) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004575 · Cited by 207
Berniak-Woźny, J., & Rataj, M. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20020908 · Cited by 129
“Examples of the articles on the issues analyzed from the perspective of COVID are as follows: • “Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond” [47], • “Framework for PESTEL dimensions of sustainable healthcare waste management: Learnings from COVID-19 outbreak” [48], • “Selection of the best healt…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States
Peahl, A. F., & Howell, J. D. (2020) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Fryer, K., Delgado, A., Foti, T., Reid, C. N., & Marshall, J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fryer, Kimberly
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2020-06-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1104-1110
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- PMC
- PMC7305486
- OpenAlex
- W3036841064
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 41.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, prenatal care, pregnant women, social distancing, Hillsborough County, Florida, telehealth implementation
- MeSH terms
- Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Middle Aged, Obstetrics, Office Visits, Pneumonia, Viral, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, United States, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
