Cited by 21Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Do Doctors Differentiate Between Suicide and Physician-Assisted Death? A Qualitative Study into the Views of Psychiatrists and General Practitioners

Open access
Pronk, Rosalie, Willems, Dick L., van de Vathorst, Suzanne·2021·Culture Medicine and Psychiatry

Abstract

Physician-assisted death for patients suffering from psychiatric disorders is allowed in the Netherlands under certain circumstances. One of the central problems that arise with regard to this practice is the question of whether it is possible to distinguish between suicidality and a request for physician-assisted death. We set up this study to gain insight into how psychiatrists and general practitioners distinguish between suicidality and physician-assisted death. The data for this study were collected through qualitative interviews with 20 general practitioners and 17 psychiatrists in the Netherlands. From the interviews, we conclude that physicians distinguish three types of death wishes among patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: 'impulsive suicidality,' 'chronic suicidality,' and 'rational death wishes.' To discern between them they evaluate whether the death wish is seen as part of the psychopathology, whether it is consistent over time, and whether they consider it treatable. Some considered physician-assisted death an alternative to a 'rational suicide,' as this was perceived to be a more humane manner of death for the patient and their relatives. We argue that physician-assisted death can be justified also in some cases in which the death wish is part of the psychopathology, as the patient's suffering can be unbearable and irremediable. Physician-assisted death in these cases may remain the only option left to relieve the suffering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11013-020-09686-2

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surveys of Swiss and Dutch psychiatrists reveal reluctance to support MAiD MD-SUMC, often citing limited familiarity with assessment procedures, uncertainty about patients' understanding and discomfort in predicting psychiatric prognoses.

    “Surveys of Swiss and Dutch psychiatrists reveal reluctance to support MAiD MD-SUMC, often citing limited familiarity with assessment procedures, uncertainty about patients’ understanding and discomfort in predicting psychiatric prognoses.”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says Dutch psychiatrists are generally reluctant to perform assisted dying for psychiatric suffering, chiefly because they find it difficult to distinguish an assisted-dying request from suicidality. The Methods > Design section (page unavailable) describes interviews with Dutch psychiatrists and GPs, not surveys of Swiss and Dutch psychiatrists. The Results > Treatment for Suicidality section discusses difficulty assessing competence and prospects for improvement, but attributes that difficulty to GPs; the paper does not establish the stated reasons as psychiatrists’ reported reasons for reluctance. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Physicians differentiate three types of death wishes among patients with psychiatric disorders: death wish related to psychopathology or impulsive suicidality; death wish consistent over time, or chronic suicidality; and rational death wishes.

    “Although physicians differentiate three types of death wishes among patients with psychiatric disorders (death wish related to psychopathology or impulsive suicidality; death wish consistent over time, or chronic suicidality, and rational death wishes) [74]”
  • The fluctuating nature of suicidality may hamper assessment of the consistency of the death wish.

    “Moreover, suicidality might complicate MAID assessment: the fluctuating nature of suicidality13 may hamper assessment of the consistency of the death wish,14 and acute suicidality might interfere with decision-making.15”
  • It may also be relevant for distinguishing MAID requests from impulsive suicidality.

    “It may also be relevant for distinguishing MAID requests from impulsive suicidality.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Berghmans R. 1992 Om bestwil. Paternalisme in de psychiatrie [In your best interest. Paternalism in psychiatry]. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
  2. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., J. Legemaate, A. van der Heide, H. van Delden, K. Evenblij, I. El Hammoud, R. Pasman, C. Ploem, R. Pronk, S. van de Vathorst, and D. Willems 2017 Derde evaluatie Wet toetsing Levensbeeindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding [Third Evaluation of the Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act] Reeks evaluatie regelgeving. 16223080

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pronk, R., Willems, D. L., & van de Vathorst, S.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Pronk, Rosalie
Venue
Culture Medicine and Psychiatry
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
268-281
ISSN
  • 0165-005X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-076X
OpenAlex
W3080870298
Cited by
21
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Culture Medicine and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NVVE
  • Amsterdam UMC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
physician-assisted death, suicide, suicidality, mental illness, death wish, rational suicide, chronic suicidality, general practitioners, psychiatrists, physician judgment, end-of-life decisions
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Euthanasia, Humans, Netherlands, Psychiatry, Suicide, Assisted, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review