Cited by 103Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Capacity evaluations of psychiatric patients requesting assisted death in The Netherlands

Open access
Doernberg, Samuel N., Peteet, John R., Kim, Scott Y.H.·2016·Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) of psychiatric patients is legal in some countries but remains controversial.Objective This study examined a frequently raised concern about the practice: how physicians address the issue of decision-making capacity of persons requesting psychiatric EAS.Methods A review of psychiatric EAS case summaries published by the Dutch Regional Euthanasia Review Committees. Directed content analysis using a capacity-specific 4 abilities model (understanding of facts, applying those facts to self, weighing/reasoning, and evidencing choice) was used to code texts discussing capacity. A total of 66 cases from 2011-2014 were reviewed.Results In 55% (36 of 66) of cases, the capacity-specific discussion consisted of only global judgments of patients' capacity, even in patients with psychotic disorders. Further, 32% (21 of 66) of cases included evidentiary statements regarding capacity-specific abilities; only 5 cases (8%) mentioned all 4 abilities. Physicians frequently stated that psychosis or depression did or did not affect capacity but provided little explanation regarding their judgments. Physicians in 8 cases (12%) disagreed about capacity; even when no explanation was given for the disagreement, the review committees generally accepted the judgment of the physician performing EAS. In one case, the physicians noted that not all capacity-specific abilities were intact but deemed the patient capable.Conclusion Case summaries of psychiatric EAS in the Netherlands do not show that a high threshold of capacity is required for granting EAS. Although this may reflect limitations in documentation, it likely represents a practice that reflects the normative position of the review committees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psym.2016.06.005

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown physicians frequently disagree on the competency of psychiatric patients who request assisted death - inter-rater reliability of capacity judgments by clinicians without the aid of standardized assessments is low, and modest evidence suggests clinicians tend to overestimate capacity.

    “Studies have shown physicians frequently disagree on the competency of psychiatric patients who request assisted death — inter-rater reliability of capacity judgments by clinicians without the aid of standardized assessments is low, and modest evidence suggests clinicians tend to overestimate capacity (6, 47–50).”

    From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The first reports of assisted death in patients with EDs in the peer-reviewed literature emerged from Belgium and the Netherlands.

    “The first reports of assisted death in patients with EDs in the peer-reviewed literature emerged from Belgium and the Netherlands (6, 12).”

    From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results report that four of the 66 Dutch psychiatric assisted-death cases involved patients with severe eating disorders. The paper therefore supports the Netherlands portion, but it does not establish that these were among the first peer-reviewed reports or report eating-disorder cases from Belgium; its Belgian figures concern neuropsychiatric cases generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The assessment of decision-making capacity in mentally ill persons can be more difficult than in persons with somatic diseases.

    “However, the assessment of the decision-making capacity in mentally ill persons can be more difficult than in persons with somatic diseases (30,31).”

    From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Abstract conclusion and Discussion say that capacity evaluation in psychiatric assisted-death cases can be complex and challenging, particularly because some neuropsychiatric conditions increase the risk of incapacity. They do not compare the difficulty of these assessments with assessments of people with somatic diseases. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In most qualitative studies, data collection could not be evaluated because studies were performed using already available data.

    “In most of the qualitative studies (Doernberg et al., 2016;Kim et al., 2016;Miller and Kim, 2017) data collection could not be evaluated because studies were performed using already available data (Table 4).”

    From Euthanasia and assisted suicide in psychiatric patients: A systematic review of the literature (2021) · cites this paper as Doernberg et al., 2016

    The Methods section says this study analyzed 66 previously published case reports, supporting the claim that it used already available data. The Discussion notes that those summaries omit parts of the medical records, but the paper does not say that data collection could not be evaluated. It also cannot establish the claim about most qualitative studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cases of assisted dying in patients with eating disorders have been documented in the United States, the Netherlands, and Belgium.

    “cases have been documented in the United States (2), the Netherlands (6–10), and Belgium (11–13).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Regional Euthanasia Review Committees Annual Report 2015 2016 The Hague
  2. [28]Regional Euthanasia Review Committees Annual report 2013 2014 The Hague
  3. [29]Regional Euthanasia Review Committees Code of Practice 2015 2015 The Hague

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doernberg, S. N., Peteet, J. R., & Kim, S. Y. H.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Scott Y.H.
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
556-565
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2462974228
Cited by
103
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 7
FWCI
24.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99CL999999)
  • NIH Clinical Center (ZIACL010539)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, psychiatric patients, decision-making capacity, capacity assessment, psychosis, depression, Netherlands, physician disagreement
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Physician-Patient Relations, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review