Cited by 7Social Power and Status DynamicsPsychological Testing and AssessmentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Women in power-themed tasks: Need for power predicts task enjoyment and power stress

Hofer, Jan, Busch, Holger·2019·Motivation and Emotion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11031-019-09782-w

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A desire for power may signal that one feels 'caged' and is attempting to compensate for a lack of autonomy.

    “Similarly, a desire for power (Hofer and Bush 2019;Winter 1973) may signal that one feels 'caged' and, hence, is attempting to compensate for a lack of autonomy (Martela et al. 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofer, J., & Busch, H.
Affiliations
Universität Trier (DE)
Corresponding author
Hofer, Jan
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
740-757
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2958912195
Cited by
7
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
task enjoyment, women, negative affect, facial expressions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review