Cited by 193Complex Network Analysis TechniquesUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics

Spatial Science and Network Science: Review and Outcomes of a Complex Relationship

Open access
Ducruet, César, Beauguitte, Laurent·2014·Networks and Spatial Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11067-013-9222-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relationships between spatial components (street network, urban locations, visual information) are systematized by use of mathematical graphs.

    “In urban studies, relationships between these spatial components are systematized by use of mathematical graphs (Ducruet and Beauguitte 2014;Barthelemy 2011).”

    From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Ducruet and Beauguitte 2014

    In “Network analysis in geography and regional science” (page unavailable), the review says transport geographers apply graph theory to networks such as roads and railways. “Local determinants of centrality” (page unavailable) describes an analysis treating streets as nodes and crossroads as links, and “Interdependent networks” discusses graph-theoretic analysis of links among cities. These passages support the use of graphs for street and urban relationships, but do not address visual information as a spatial component. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. Alderson DL (β008) Catching the "network science" bug: Insight and opportunity for the operations researcher. Operations Research, 56(5): 1047-1065.
  2. Andersson C, Hellervik A and Lindgren K (2005) A spatial network explanation for a hierarchy of urban power laws, Physica A, 345(1-2): 227-244.
  3. Andersson C, Frenken K and Hellervik A (2006) A complex network approach to urban growth, Environment and Planning A, 38(10): 1951-1964.
  4. Barnett L, Di Paolo I and Bullock S (2007) Spatially embedded random networks. Physical Reviews E, 76(5): 056115.
  5. Barabási AL and Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439): 509-512.
  6. Barber MJ, Fischer MM, Scherngell T (2011) The community structure of research and development cooperation in Europe: Evidence from a social network perspective, Geographical Analysis, 43(4): 415-432.
  7. Barrat A, Barthélemy M and Vespignani A (2005) The effects of spatial constraints on the evolution of weighted complex networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P05003.
  8. Barthélemy M (2003) Crossover from scale-free to spatial networks. Europhysics letters, 63: 915.
  9. Barthélemy M and Flammini A (2009) Co-evolution of density and topology in a simple model of city formation. Networks and Spatial Economics, 9(3): 401-425.
  10. Beauguitte L (2010) Looking for European Union in the Word-System: A multi-graph approach, Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association Conference, http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper698.pdf
  11. Béguin H and Thomas I (1997) The shape of the transportation network and the optimal location of facilities. How to measure the shape of a network? Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 26: http://cybergeo.revues.org/index2189.html (in French).
  12. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M and Hwang DU (2006) Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4-5) :175-308.
  13. Bogart D (2009) Inter-modal network externalities and transport development: Evidence from roads, canals, and ports during the English Industrial Revolution, Networks and Spatial Economics, 9(3): 309-338.
  14. Boguna M, Pastor-Satorras R, Diaz-Guilera A and Arenas A (2004) Models of social networks based on social distance attachment, Physical Review E, 70: 056122.
  15. Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ and Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916): 892-985.
  16. Bosco FJ (2006) Actor-network theory, networks, and relational approaches in human geography, in Aitken S and Valentine G (Eds) Approaches to Human Geography, SAGE Publications, pp. 136-146.
  17. Bretagnolle A (2009) Analyse morphodynamique du réseau des routes de poste en France (XVIe-XIXe siècles), in Bléton-Ruget A, Commerçon N and Vannier M (Eds) Réseaux en question : utopies, pratiques et prospective, Institut de recherche du Val de Saône-Maconnais, pp. 117-138.
  18. Bretagnolle A and Pumain D (2010) Simulating urban networks through multiscalar space- time dynamics: Europe and the United States, 17th-20th centuries. Urban Studies, 47(13): 2819-2839.
  19. Bullock S, Barnett L and Di Paolo E (2010) Spatial embedding and the structure of complex networks. Complexity, 16(2): 20-28.
  20. Cattan N (1995a) Attractivity and internationalisation of major European cities: The example of air traffic. Urban studies, 32(2): 303-312.
  21. Cattan, N. (1995b) Barrier effects: The case of air and rail flows, International Political Science Review, 16(3): 237-248.
  22. Choi JH, Barnett JA and Chon BS (2006) Comparing world city networks: a network analysis of Internet backbone and air transport intercity linkages, Global Networks, 6(1): 81-99.
  23. Cicéri MF, Marchand B and Rimbert S (1977) Introduction à l'analyse de l'espace, Paris: Masson. Comin MN (2009) Networks of cities and networks of innovation in Europe: the structuring of the European system of cities through research networks dedicated to converging technologies, PhD dissertation in Geography, University of Paris I (724 pages).
  24. Crossley N (2005) Review article: The New Social Physics and the Science of Small World Networks, Sociological Review, 53(2): 351-359.
  25. Crossley N (2008) Small-world networks, complex systems and sociology. Sociology, 42(2): 261-277.
  26. Dancoisne P (1984) Théorie des graphes et constitution du réseau ferré français, Unpublished PhD dissertation in Geography, Paris: Université Paris I.
  27. Davis GF, Yoo M and Baker WE (2003) The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982-2001, Strategic Organization, 1(3): 301-326.
  28. De Montis A, Chessa A, Caschili S, Campagna M and Deplano G (2010) Modeling commuting systems through a complex network analysis: A study of the Italian islands of Sardinia and Sicily. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2(3/4): 39-55.
  29. Devriendt L, Derudder B and Witlox F (2010) Conceptualizing digital and physical connectivity: The position of European cities in Internet backbone and air traffic flows. Telecommunications Policy, 34(8): 417-429.
  30. Ducruet C (2013a) Network diversity and maritime flows. Journal of Transport Geography, 30: 77-88.
  31. Ducruet C, Rozenblat C, Zaidi F (2010) Ports in multi-level maritime networks: Evidence from the Atlantic (1996-2006), Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4): 508-518.
  32. Ducruet C, Ietri D and Rozenblat C (2011a) Cities in worldwide air and sea flows: A multiple networks analysis. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 528: http://cybergeo.revues.org/23603
  33. Ducruet C, Lee SW, Song JM (2011b) Network position and throughput performance of seaports, in Notteboom TE (Ed) Current Issues in Shipping, Ports, and Logistics, ASP Publishers, Brussels, pp. 185-201.
  34. Ducruet C and Lugo I (2013a) Cities and transport networks in shipping and logistics research. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(2): 145-166.
  35. Ducruet C and Lugo I (2013b) Structure and dynamics of transport networks: concepts, models, and applications, in Rodrigue JP, Notteboom TE and Shaw J (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Transport Studies, SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 347-364.
  36. Ducruet C and Notteboom TE (2012) The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: Spatial structure and regional dynamics, Global Networks, 12(3): 395-423.
  37. Ducruet C and Zaidi F (2012) Maritime constellations: A complex network approach to shipping and ports. Maritime Policy and Management, 39(2): 159-168. .
  38. Dupuy G (ed.) (1988) Réseaux territoriaux. Caen, Paradigme (286 pages).
  39. Eagle N, Macy M and Claxton R (2010) Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981): 1029-1031.
  40. Erath A, Löchl M, Axhausen KW (2009) Graph-theoretical analysis of the Swiss road and railway networks over time. Networks and Spatial Economics, 9(3): 379-400.
  41. Evans AJ (2010) Complex spatial networks in application, Complexity, 16(2): 11-19.
  42. Expert P, Evans TS, Blondel VD and Lambiotte R (2011) Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 108(19): 7663-7668.
  43. Fleming L, King C and Juda A (2007) Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6): 938-954.
  44. Freeman L (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver: Empirical Press (218 pages).
  45. Gabaix X and Ioannides Y (2004) The evolution of city size distributions, in Henderson JV and Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, pp. 2341-2378.
  46. Garrison WL (1960) Connectivity of the Interstate Highway System, Regional Science Association, Papers and Proceedings, 6: 121-137.
  47. Gastner MT and Newman MEJ (2006) Optimal design of spatial distribution networks. Physical Review E, 74(1): 16117.
  48. Gattuso D and Miriello E (2005) Compared analysis of metro networks supported by graph theory. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5(4): 395-414.
  49. Gleyze JF (2007) Making allowances for spatial and network effects when assessing indicators on infrastructure network nodes. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 370, http://cybergeo.revues.org/index5532.html
  50. Gleyze JF (2013) Topological clustering for geographical networks, in Rozenblat C and Melançon G (eds), Methods for Multilevel Analysis and Visualization of Geographical Networks, Springer, pp. 33-53.
  51. Gorman SP, Schintler L, Kulkarni R and Stough R (2004) The revenge of distance: Vulnerability analysis of critical information infrastructure. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(2): 48-63.
  52. Gorman SP and Kulkarni R (2004) Spatial small worlds: New geographic patterns for an information economy. Environment and Planning B, 31(2): 273-296.
  53. Gorman SP, Patuelli R, Reggiani A, Nijkamp P, Kulkarni R and Haag G (2007) An application of complex network theory to German commuting patterns, in Friesz TL (Ed) Network Science, Nonlinear Science and Infrastructure Systems, Springer, New York, pp. 167-185.
  54. Gosak M, Korosak D and Marhl M (2011) Topologically determined optimal stochastic resonance responses of spatially embedded networks, New Journal of Physics, 13: 013012.
  55. Grabher G (2006) Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of 'networks' between economic sociology and economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2):1-27.
  56. Grubesic TH, Matisziw TC and Zook MA (2008) Global airline networks and nodal regions. Geojournal, 71(1): 53-66.
  57. Guo D, Liu S and Jin H (2010) A graph-based approach to vehicle trajectory analysis, Journal of Location Based Services, 4(3-4): 183-199.
  58. Hayashi Y and Matsukubo J (2006) Geographical effects on the path length and the robustness in complex networks, Physical Review E, 73: 066113.
  59. Hillier B and Hanson J (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  60. Hu Y and Zhu D (2009) Empirical analysis of the worldwide maritime transportation network. Physica A, 388(101): 2061-2071.
  61. Huang L, Yang L and Yang K (2005) Geographical effects on cascading breakdowns of scale- free networks. Physical Review E, 73(3): 036102.
  62. Illenberger J, Nagel K and Flötteröd G (2013) The role of spatial interaction in social networks. Networks and Spatial Economics, 13(3): 255-282.
  63. Jacobs W, Ducruet C and De Langen PW (2010) Integrating world cities into production networks: The case of port cities, Global Networks, 10(1): 92-113.
  64. Jiang B and Claramunt C (2004) Topological analysis of urban streets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(1): 151-162.
  65. Jin F, Wang C, Li X and Wang J (β010) China's regional transport dominance: Density, proximity, and accessibility, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(2): 295-309.
  66. Kaiser M and Hilgetag CC (2004) Spatial growth of real-world networks. Physical Review E, 69: 036103.
  67. Kansky KJ (1963) Structure of transportation networks: Relationship between network geometry and regional characteristics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (155 pages).
  68. Kurant M and Thiran P (2006) Extraction and analysis of traffic and topologies of transportation networks. Physical Review E, 74(3): 36114.
  69. Lambert A, Bourqui R and Aubert D (2013) Graph visualization for geography, in Rozenblat C and Melançon G (eds), Methods for Multilevel Analysis and Visualization of Geographical Networks, Springer, pp. 81-102.
  70. Lambiotte R, Blondel VD, de Kerchove C, Huens E, Prieur C, Smoreda Z and Van Dooren P (2008) Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks, Physica A, 387(21): 5317- 5325.
  71. Lane D, van der Leeuw S, Pumain D and West G (2009) Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change, Methodos Series 7, Springer (492 pages).
  72. Liefner I and Hennemann S (2011) Structural holes and new dimensions of distance: the spatial configuration of the scientific knowledge network of China's optical technology sector, Environment and Planning A, 43(4): 810-829.
  73. Liu X, Derudder B and Gago Garcia C (2013) Exploring the co-evolution of the geographies of air transport aviation and corporate networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 30: 26-36.
  74. Lugo I (2013) Spatial externalities approach to modelling the preferential attachment process in urban systems, Proceedings of the European Conference of Complex Systems 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer (forthcoming).
  75. Mathis P (ed.) (2003) Graphes et réseaux. Modélisation multi-niveaux. Paris: Lavoisier (361 pages).
  76. Matthiessen CW, Schwarz AW and Find S (2006) World cities of knowledge: research strength, networks and nodality, Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(5): 14-25.
  77. Melançon G and Rozenblat C (2013) Structural analysis of networks, in Rozenblat C and Melançon G (eds), Methods for Multilevel Analysis and Visualization of Geographical Networks, Springer, pp. 69-80.
  78. Miller HJ (1999) Potential Contributions of Spatial Analysis to Geographic Information Systems for Transportation (GIS-T), Geographical Analysis, 31(4): 373-399.
  79. Newman MEJ (2000) Models of the Small World. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101(3-4): 819-841.
  80. Newman MEJ (2010) Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press (784 pages).
  81. Newman MEJ, Barabási AL and Watts D (eds) (2006) The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press (624 pages).
  82. Nystuen JD and Dacey MF (1961) A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions, Papers in Regional Science, 7(1): 29-42.
  83. Opsahl T and Panzarasa P (2009) Clustering in weighted networks. Social Networks, 31(2): 155-163.
  84. Parshani R., Rozenblat C., Ietri D., Ducruet C., Havlin S. (2010) Inter-similarity between coupled networks, Europhysics Letters, 92:68002.
  85. Patuelli R, Reggiani A, Gorman S, Nijkamp P and Bade F (2007) Network analysis of commuting flows: A comparative static approach to German data. Networks and Spatial Economics, 7(4): 315-331.
  86. Pflieger G and Rozenblat C (2010) Introduction. Urban networks and network theory: The city as the connector of multiple networks, Urban Studies, 47(13): 2723-2735.
  87. Porta S, Crucitti P and Latora V (2006) The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach, Environment and Planning B, 33(5): 705-725.
  88. Porta S, Latora V, Wang F, Rueda S, Strano E, Scellato S, Cardillo A, Belli E, Cardenas F, Cormenzana B and Latora L (2012) Street centrality and the location of economic activities in Barcelona, Urban Studies, 49(7): 1471-1488.
  89. Radil SM, Flint C and Tita GE (2010) Spatializing social networks: Using social network analysis to investigate geographies of gang rivalry, territoriality, and violence in Los Angeles. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(2): 307-326.
  90. Reggiani A, Bucci P, Russo G, Haas A and Nijkamp P (2011) Regional labour markets and job accessibility in City Network systems in Germany, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 528-536.
  91. Reggiani A, Bucci P, Russo G (2011) Accessibility and network structures in the German commuting. Networks and Spatial Economics, 11(4): 621-641.
  92. Reggiani A and Vinciguerra S (2011) Network connectivity models: An overview and empirical applications, in Friesz T (ed), Network Science, Nonlinear Science and Infrastructure Systems, Springer, pp. 147-165.
  93. Rosato V, Issacharoff L, Tiriticco F, Meloni S, De Porcellinis S and Setola R (2008) Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 4(1-2): 63-79.
  94. Rozenblat C and Pumain D (1993) The location of multinational firms in the European urban system. Urban studies, 30(10): 1691-1709.
  95. Rozenblat C and Mélançon G (2007) A small world perspective on urban systems. Handbook of Theoretical and Quantitative Geography, Lausanne: Univ. of Lausanne Ed., pp. 431-467.
  96. Rozenblat C (2010) Opening the black box of agglomeration economies for measuring cities' competitiveness through international firm networks, Urban Studies, 74(13): 2841-2865.
  97. Rozenblat C, Melançon G, Bourqui R and Auber D (2013) Comparing multilevel clustering methods on weighted graphs: The case of worldwide air passenger traffic 2000-2004, in Rozenblat C and Melançon G (eds), Methods for Multilevel Analysis and Visualization of Geographical Networks, Springer, pp. 141-154.
  98. Schintler LA, Kulkarni R, Gorman S and Stough R (2007) Using raster-based GIS and graph theory to analyze complex networks, Networks and Spatial Economics, 7(4): 301-313.
  99. Stoneham AKM (1977) The small-world problem in a spatial context. Environment and Planning A, 9(2): 185-195.
  100. Sui DZ (β004) Tobler's first law of geography: A big idea for a small world? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2): 269-277.
  101. Taaffe EJ, Morrill RL and Gould PR (1963) Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries: A comparative analysis, Geographical Review, 4: 503-529.
  102. Ter Wal ALJ and Boschma RA (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3): 739- 756.
  103. Tissandier P, Phan Quang TT and Archambault D (2013) Defining polycentric urban areas through commuting cohesion in France, in Rozenblat C and Melançon G (eds), Methods for Multilevel Analysis and Visualization of Geographical Networks, Springer, pp. 189-206.
  104. Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46(2): 234-240.
  105. Vinciguerra S, Frenken K and Valente M (2010) The geography of Internet infrastructure: an evolutionary simulation approach based on preferential attachment. Urban Studies, 47(9): 1969-1984.
  106. Vitali S and Battiston S (2011) Geography versus topology in the European Ownership Network, New Journal of Physics, 13: 063021.
  107. Wang J, Jin F, Mo H and Wang F (2009) Spatiotemporal evolution of China's railway network in the 20th century: An accessibility approach. Transportation Research Part A, 43(8): 765-778.
  108. Wang J, Mo H, Wang F and Jin F (2011) Exploring the network structure and nodal centrality of China's air transport network: A complex network approach, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 712-721.
  109. Waters N (2006) Network and Nodal Indices. Measures of Complexity and Redundancy: A Review, in Reggiani A and Nijkamp P (eds), Spatial dynamics, networks and modelling, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 13-33.
  110. Xie F and Levinson D (2009) Modeling the growth of transportation networks: A comprehensive review, Networks and Spatial Economics, 9(3): 291-307.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ducruet, C., & Beauguitte, L.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Identités et Différenciation de l'Environnement des Espaces et des Sociétés (FR)
Corresponding author
Ducruet, César
Venue
Networks and Spatial Economics
Published
2013-12-23
Volume
14
Issue
3-4
Pages
297-316
ISSN
  • 1566-113X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9427
OpenAlex
W2064782140
Cited by
193
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Networks and Spatial Economics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (2007–2013, FP/2007/2013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Keywords
spatial networks, network science, complex networks, scale-free networks, small-world networks, graph theory, regional science, multidisciplinary integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review