Cited by 237Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsVibration and Dynamic AnalysisInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies

Highly efficient nonlinear energy sink

Open access
AL-Shudeifat, Mohammad A.·2014·Nonlinear Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-014-1256-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AL-Shudeifat, M. A.
Affiliations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Corresponding author
AL-Shudeifat, Mohammad A.
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2014-01-30
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
1905-1920
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W1965448655
Cited by
237
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2
FWCI
17.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Keywords
nonlinear energy sink, targeted energy transfer, negative stiffness, geometric nonlinearity, shock mitigation, passive vibration control, nonlinear normal modes, resonance capture, impulsive loading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review