CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and AnalysisVibration and Dynamic Analysis

Finite contact duration modeling of a Vibro-Impact Nonlinear Energy Sink to protect a civil engineering frame structure against seismic events

Open access
Lo Feudo, S., Job, S., Cavallo, M., Fraddosio, A., Piccioni, M.D., Tafuni, A.·2022·Engineering Structures
DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114137
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114137

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both contact models converged to the same mean values, with finite contact models acting as a low pass filter that keeps the response away from nonphysical chaotic states.

    “However, both models were found to converge to the same mean values where the finite contact models were acting as a low pass filter which keeps the response away from the nonphysical chaotic states.”

    From A review on nonlinear energy sinks: designs, analysis and applications of impact and rotary types (2023) · cites this paper as [234]

  • The instantaneous contact model was very sensitive to initial conditions, unlike the finite contact model.

    “Unlike the finite contact model, it was found out in [234] that the instantaneous contact model was very sensitive to the initial conditions (either in the form of initial displacements and/or velocities).”

    From A review on nonlinear energy sinks: designs, analysis and applications of impact and rotary types (2023) · cites this paper as [234]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Lo Feudo, S., Job, S., Cavallo, M., Fraddosio, A., Piccioni, M. D., & Tafuni, A.
Affiliations
  • Institut Supérieur de Mécanique de Paris (FR)
  • Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
259
Pages
114137
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114137
OpenAlex
W3110707322
Cited by
31
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Keywords
seismic vibration control, frame structures, energy dissipation, sensitivity to initial conditions, chaotic dynamics, low-pass filtering, earthquake response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review