Cited by 27Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsChaos control and synchronization

Command filtered robust control of nonlinear systems with full-state time-varying constraints and disturbances rejection

Yang, Guichao, Wang, Hua, Chen, Jie, Zhang, Hao·2020·Nonlinear Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-020-05921-y

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, G., Wang, H., Chen, J., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
Nanjing Tech University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Hua
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2020-09
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
2325-2342
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W3086712598
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Key Research & Development Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2019007-3)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
command filtered backstepping, robust control, nonlinear systems, time-varying state constraints, barrier Lyapunov function, explosion of complexity, disturbance rejection, feedforward compensation, full-state constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review