The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sheddable Coatings for Long-Circulating Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticles, such as liposomes, polymeric micelles, lipoplexes and polyplexes are frequently studied as targeted drug carrier systems. The ability of these particles to circulate in the bloodstream for a prolonged period of time is often a prerequisite for successful targeted delivery. To achieve this, hydrophilic 'stealth' polymers, such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), are used as coating materials. Such polymers shield the particle surface and thereby reduce opsonization by blood proteins and uptake by macrophages of the mononuclear phagocyte system. Yet, after localizing in the pathological site, nanoparticles should deliver their contents in an efficient manner to achieve a sufficient therapeutic response. The polymer coating, however, may hinder drug release and target cell interaction and can therefore be an obstacle in the realization of the therapeutic response. Attempts have been made to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of sterically stabilized nanoparticles by means of shedding, i.e. a loss of the coating after arrival at the target site. Such an 'unmasking' process may facilitate drug release and/or target cell interaction processes. This review presents an overview of the literature regarding different shedding strategies that have been investigated for the preparation of sterically stabilized nanoparticulates. Detach mechanisms and stimuli that have been used are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers
Torchilin, V. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1632 · Cited by 5,282
“SMART” Drug Delivery Systems: Double-Targeted pH-Responsive Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers
Sawant, R. M., Hurley, J. P., Salmaso, S., Kale, A., Tolcheva, E., Levchenko, T. S., & Torchilin, V. P. (2006) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc060080h · Cited by 540
Holland, J. W., Hui, C., Cullis, P. R., & Madden, T. D. (1996) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi952000v · Cited by 223
Cited by
PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery
Suk, J. S., Xu, Q., Kim, N., Hanes, J., & Ensign, L. M. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.012 · Cited by 4,523
Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
Kamaly, N., Yameen, B., Wu, J., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346 · Cited by 3,070
Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers
Ulery, B. D., Nair, L. S., & Laurencin, C. T. (2011) · Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics · doi:10.1002/polb.22259 · Cited by 2,206
Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics
Kanasty, R., Dorkin, J. R., Vegas, A., & Anderson, D. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3765 · Cited by 1,800
Metadata
- Authors
- Romberg, B., Hennink, W. E., & Storm, G.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Published
- 2007-06-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-71
- ISSN
- 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-904X
- OpenAlex
- W1989065176
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sheddable Coatings for Long-Circulating Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11095-007-9348-7
- The paper
- Romberg, B., Hennink, W. E., & Storm, G. (2008). Sheddable Coatings for Long-Circulating Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutical Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9348-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.