The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design, Optimization and Characterisation of Polymeric Microneedle Arrays Prepared by a Novel Laser-Based Micromoulding Technique
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACTPurposeDesign and evaluation of a novel laser-based method for micromoulding of microneedle arrays from polymeric materials under ambient conditions. The aim of this study was to optimise polymeric composition and assess the performance of microneedle devices that possess different geometries.MethodsA range of microneedle geometries was engineered into silicone micromoulds, and their physicochemical features were subsequently characterised.ResultsMicroneedles micromoulded from 20% w/w aqueous blends of the mucoadhesive copolymer Gantrez® AN-139 were surprisingly found to possess superior physical strength than those produced from commonly used pharma polymers. Gantrez® AN-139 microneedles, 600 μm and 900 μm in height, penetrated neonatal porcine skin with low application forces (>0.03 N per microneedle). When theophylline was loaded into 600 μm microneedles, 83% of the incorporated drug was delivered across neonatal porcine skin over 24 h. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed that drug-free 600 μm Gantrez® AN-139 microneedles punctured the stratum corneum barrier of human skin in vivo and extended approximately 460 µm into the skin. However, the entirety of the microneedle lengths was not inserted.ConclusionIn this study, we have shown that a novel laser engineering method can be used in micromoulding of polymeric microneedle arrays. We are currently carrying out an extensive OCT-informed study investigating the influence of microneedle array geometry on skin penetration depth, with a view to enhanced transdermal drug delivery from optimised laser-engineered Gantrez® AN-139 microneedles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAllister, D. V., Wang, P. M., Davis, S. P., Park, J.-H., Canatella, P. J., Allen, M. G., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2331316100 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Larrañeta, E., Lutton, R. E. M., Woolfson, A. D., & Donnelly, R. F. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2016.03.001 · Cited by 964
Self-citationAldawood, F. K., Andar, A., & Desai, S. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13162815 · Cited by 499
Recent advances of controlled drug delivery using microfluidic platforms
Sanjay, S. T., Zhou, W., Dou, M., Tavakoli, H., Ma, L., Xu, F., & Li, X. (2018) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.013 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, R. F., Majithiya, R., Singh, T. R. R., Morrow, D. I. J., Garland, M. J., Demir, Y. K., Migalska, K., Ryan, E., Gillen, D., Scott, C. J., & Woolfson, A. D.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Published
- 2010-05-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-57
- ISSN
- 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-904X
- OpenAlex
- W1974989774
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design, Optimization and Characterisation of Polymeric Microneedle Arrays Prepared by a Novel Laser-Based Micromoulding Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11095-010-0169-8
- The paper
- Donnelly, R. F., Majithiya, R., Singh, T. R. R., Morrow, D. I. J., Garland, M. J., Demir, Y. K., Migalska, K., Ryan, E., Gillen, D., Scott, C. J., & Woolfson, A. D. (2011). Design, Optimization and Characterisation of Polymeric Microneedle Arrays Prepared by a Novel Laser-Based Micromoulding Technique. Pharmaceutical Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0169-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.