The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
We-Intentions Revisited
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind
Searle, J. R. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173452 · Cited by 4,575
Searle, J. R. (1983) · Cited by 2,418
Searle, J. R. (1983) · Cited by 2,418
Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency
Bratman, M. E. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625190 · Cited by 1,496
Collective Intentions and Actions
Searle, J. R. (1990) · Intentions in Communication · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0021 · Cited by 839
Collective Intentions and Actions
(2002) · Consciousness and Language · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606366.007 · Cited by 531
Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon
Gilbert, M., & Philosophy Documentation Center (1990) · Midwest Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1990.tb00202.x · Cited by 491
Tuomela, R., & Miller, K. (1988) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00353512 · Cited by 342
Self-citationSocializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality
Schmitt, F. F. (2003) · Cited by 330
The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View
Tuomela, R. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487446 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Cited by
Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0545 · Cited by 721
A minimal architecture for joint action
Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002 · Cited by 398
The quality of group tacit knowledge
Erden, Z., von Krogh, G., & Nonaka, I. (2008) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2008.02.002 · Cited by 238
Pacherie, E. (2011) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0052-5 · Cited by 68
Skilled we-intentionality: Situating joint action in the living environment
Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2021) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.13411.2 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuomela, R.
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-369
- ISSN
- 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0883
- OpenAlex
- W2077721796
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 49.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: We-Intentions Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11098-005-7781-1
- The paper
- Tuomela, R. (2005). We-Intentions Revisited. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7781-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
