The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Biochar addition to soils does not always result in consistent yield increases (e.g., [35]) and plant responses to biochar addition have been reported to vary considerably.”
From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, van Zwieten et al. (2010) reported increased soil pH values due to sludge biochar addition in an acidic Ferrosol cropped with wheat, radish, and soybean.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as van Zwieten et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“Some studies (Karer et al., 2013; Lentz and Ippolito, 2012; van Zwieten et al., 2010) did not observe a significant change in soil pH due to biochar addition where initial values were ranging between pH 7.4-7.8.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as van Zwieten et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“As shown in Table 2, CEC increased in all cases except one where the soil was a calcarosol (van Zwieten et al. 2010).”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as van Zwieten et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“However, not only the biochar or soil type, crop choices also can determine the response of biochar as van Zwieten et al. (2010) found that wheat biomass increased linearly up to an biochar application rate of 10 t ha -1 , and decreased with 20 and 50 t ha -1 , whereas radish growth did not decrease with high rate of biochar in an acid soil of the tropics.”
From A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security (2019) · cites this paper as van Zwieten et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“For example, the pH of the biochar particles (9.2) may be much higher than that of the surrounding soil (4.2) and the mixture of 2 % w/w biochar may show an intermediate pH (5.9) (Fig. 2).”
From Biochars and the plant-soil interface (2015) · cites this paper as Van Zwieten et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“Some biochars may increase crop yield, whereas others may decrease yield for reasons that are readily explainable using known responses of crops to for example altered pH or salt contents (Van Zwieten et al. 2010;Rajkovich et al. 2012) and short-term N limitation in N deficient soil (Clough et al. 2013).”
From Biochars and the plant-soil interface (2015) · cites this paper as Van Zwieten et al. 2010
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5 · Cited by 3,053
Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods.
Rayment, G. E., & Higginson, F. R. (1992) · Cited by 2,571
Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils
Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O'Neill, B., Skjemstad, J. O., Thies, J., Luizão, F. J., Petersen, J., et al. (2006) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0383 · Cited by 2,191
Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A., & Joseph, S. (2007) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr07109 · Cited by 1,902
Self-citationLehmann, J. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:bitb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,714
Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—A review
Ioannidou, O., & Zabaniotou, A. A. (2006) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013 · Cited by 1,534
Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J. C., Nehls, T., de Macêdo, J. L. V., Blum, W. E. H., & Zech, W. (2007) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9 · Cited by 1,356
Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues
Demirbas, A. (2004) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003 · Cited by 1,154
Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes
Cheng, C.-H., Lehmann, J., Thies, J. E., Burton, S. D., & Engelhard, M. H. (2006) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.06.022 · Cited by 1,129
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- National Council for Air and Stream Improvement IN (2005) Composting of by-product solids from the pulp and paper industry. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC
- Nemerow LF, Agardy FJ (1998) Strategies of industrial and hazardous waste management. Wiley, p 207. ISBN 0471292168, 9780471292166
- OECD (1984) Earthworm, acute toxicity tests. OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals, Section 2, Effects on biotic systems. OECD, Paris
- Servos MR (1996) Origins of effluent chemicals and toxicity: Recent research and future directions. In: Servos MR, Munkittrick KR, Carey JH, van der Kraak GJ (eds)Environmental fate and effects of pulp and paper mill effluents. CRC Press. ISBN: 1884015719, pp 159–166
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,004 of 1,004
Yadav, V., Khare, P., Deshmukh, Y., Shanker, K., Nigam, N., & Karak, T. (2018) · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · doi:10.1080/00103624.2018.1538371 · Cited by 18
Puglia, M., Morselli, N., Lumi, M., Santunione, G., Pedrazzi, S., & Allesina, G. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14698 · Cited by 17
Soni, N., Leon, R. G., Erickson, J. E., Ferrell, J. A., Silveira, M. L., & Giurcanu, M. C. (2014) · Weed Technology · doi:10.1614/wt-d-14-00044.1 · Cited by 12
Newton, R. A., Souki, K. S. A., Kwoczynski, Z., Popelka, J., & Pidlisnyuk, V. (2026) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ae6237 · Cited by 3
“Biochar addition to soil enhances CEC, improving nutrient retention and minimizing nutrient loss through leaching [47, 89, 90].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Morris, S., Chan, K. Y., Downie, A., Rust, J., Joseph, S., & Cowie, A.
- Affiliations
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2009-06-19
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 235-246
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2092521540
- Cited by
- 1,916
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 141 · 2021: 171 · 2020: 181 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 74.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NSW Department of Primary Industries
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biochar, slow pyrolysis, soil amendment, soil fertility, Ferrosol, soil pH, cation exchange capacity, fertilizer use efficiency, crop biomass, wheat, soybean, radish, earthworms, soil organic carbon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
