The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality and decomposition in soil of rhizome, root and senescent leaf from Miscanthus x giganteus, as affected by harvest date and N fertilization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared to annual crops, Miscanthus has the potential to sequester C due to reduced soil disturbance (tillage is only required as part of the initial cultivation; Post & Kwon, 2000), the translocation of C from above‐ground biomass to roots and rhizomes (Kuzyakov & Domanski, 2000), and the provision of soil C inputs from leaf litter (Amougou, Bertrand, Machet, & Recous, 2011).”
From Measured and modelled effect of land‐use change from temperate grassland to Miscanthus on soil carbon stocks after 12 years (2019) · cites this paper as Amougou, Bertrand, Machet, & Recous, 2011
In the citing paper
“Leaf litter inputs to the soil are an important part of carbon cycling (Amougou et al., 2011) and we found that Hyb 4, which lost the most below‐ground biomass between T6 and T12, also had the highest ripening loss which may have acted as compensation.”
From Measured and modelled effect of land‐use change from temperate grassland to Miscanthus on soil carbon stocks after 12 years (2019) · cites this paper as Amougou et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Data for C inputs from BGB are difficult to interpret, especially for roots because they are based on many single observations [45, 61, 62, 64, 80] rather than time series [26, 32, 81–83].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Miscanthus rhizomes and roots are potentially the most easily decomposable parts [64], but in its [19] function as a storage organ, the carbohydrate and crude protein content of the rhizome changes seasonally to support regrowth of the plants in spring [105].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“In general terms, litter decay is proportional to its nutrient content and inversely proportional to lignin content [64]; it is also controlled by nutrient availability (particularly N) in the soil [112, 113].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Most obvious is the effect of temperature on the MRT of leaf Miscanthus litter derived in litter bags and laboratory incubations [62, 64, 69, 108, 122].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“A microcosm experiment showed that free access by soil fauna increased litter turnover by an order of magnitude [110] compared to those observed in litter bags [64, 123].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“The commonly used litter bag method [64, 69, 78] prevents physical incorporation of the debris into the soil and does not allow access of larger biota (e.g. earthworms).”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Potential decomposition rates of Miscanthus residues, both in situ (litter bags) and by laboratory incubation, decreased in order from young rhizome to litter and roots, with MRT ranging from 1.2 to 2.4 years [64, 69], similar to other results [62].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“About 35 % of leaf C was stabilised as recalcitrant plant debris or as microbial biomass [64], but the amount of C stabilised in humus remains unknown.”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [64]
Citations
Cites
A simple and rapid preparation of alditol acetates for monosaccharide analysis
Blakeney, A. B., Harris, P. J., Henry, R. J., & Stone, B. (1983) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/0008-6215(83)88244-5 · Cited by 1,971
Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation
Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., & Dignac, M.-F. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-0907-y · Cited by 1,861
World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel
Lal, R. (2005) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005 · Cited by 1,004
Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop
Lewandowski, I., Clifton-Brown, J. C., Scurlock, J. M. O., & Huisman, W. (2000) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(00)00032-5 · Cited by 988
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus
HEATON, E. A., DOHLEMAN, F. G., & LONG, S. P. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x · Cited by 886
Krom, M. D. (1980) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/an9800500305 · Cited by 712
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus
Rank, F., & Gregory, W. F. (2008) · Cited by 684
Automated analysis for nitrate by hydrazine reduction
Kamphake, L. J., Hannah, S. A., & Cohen, J. (1967) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/0043-1354(67)90011-5 · Cited by 646
Heaton, E. A., Voigt, T., & Long, S. P. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.10.005 · Cited by 574
Trinsoutrot, I., Recous, S., Bentz, B., Linères, M., Chèneby, D., & Nicolardot, B. (2000) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.643918x · Cited by 553
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fibre analyses. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, Agric Handb No. 379, USDA-ARS
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Don, A., Osborne, B., Hastings, A., Skiba, U., Carter, M. S., Drewer, J., Flessa, H., Freibauer, A., Hyvönen, N., Jones, M. B., et al. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x · Cited by 363
Byrt, C. S., Grof, C. P. L., & Furbank, R. T. (2010) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01023.x · Cited by 187
Nsanganwimana, F., Pourrut, B., Mench, M., & Douay, F. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.027 · Cited by 184
Dohleman, F. G., Heaton, E. A., Arundale, R. A., & Long, S. P. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x · Cited by 175
Domeignoz‐Horta, L. A., Philippot, L., Peyrard, C., Bru, D., Breuil, M., Bizouard, F., Justes, É., Mary, B., Léonard, J., & Spor, A. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13853 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Amougou, N., Bertrand, I., Machet, J.-M., & Recous, S.
- Affiliations
- Fractionnation of AgroResources and Environment (FR)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Recous, Sylvie
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 2010-06-04
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 83-97
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W2000903464
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- Miscanthus × giganteus, biomass decomposition, soil carbon mineralization, nitrogen fertilization, harvest time, rhizome, roots, senescent leaves, lignin, soluble sugars, energy crops, residue quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
