Political considerations in nonpolitical decisions: A conjoint analysis of roommate choice
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars have demonstrated partisan discrimination on dating websites, family dinners, roommate selection, spousal selection, job hiring, and pay for work.
“In other behavioral approaches, scholars have demonstrated discrimination on dating websites (Huber & Malhotra, 2017), family dinners (Chen & Rohla, 2018), roommate selection (Shafranek, 2021), spousal selection (Iyengar et al., 2018), job hiring (Gift & Gift, 2015), and pay for work (McConnell et al., 2018).”
From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Shafranek, 2021
There is evidence that ideological and partisan considerations inform the choice of friends, as well as business and romantic partners.
“there is evidence that ideological and partisan considerations inform the choice of friends, as well as business and romantic partners218–221.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [221]
Cites
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452 · see citing works
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpt024 · Cited by 1,990 · see citing works
The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/688223 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2015) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.11.003 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
The Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness
Nicholson, S. P., Coe, C. M., Emory, J., & Song, A. V. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9339-7 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2026) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70152 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shafranek, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shafranek, Richard M.
- Venue
- Political Behavior
- Published
- 2019-06-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 271-300
- ISSN
- 0190-9320 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6687
- OpenAlex
- W2949024091
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 23.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Political Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- partisanship, housing choice, political affiliation, political interest, social avoidance, individuating information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
