The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Gap Between Lifetime Fertility Intentions and Completed Fertility in Europe and the United States: A Cohort Approach
Open accessAbstract
We study the aggregate gap between intended and actual fertility in 19 European countries and the US based on a cohort approach. This complements prior research that had mainly used a period approach. We compare the mean intended number of children among young women aged 20 to 24 (born in the early 1970s), measured during the 1990s in the Fertility and Family Surveys, with data on completed fertility in the same cohorts around age 40. In a similar manner, we compare the share who state that they do not want a child with actual cohort childlessness. Our exploration is informed by the cognitive–social model of fertility intentions developed by Bachrach and Morgan (Popul Dev Rev 39(3):459–485, 2013). In all countries, women eventually had, on average, fewer children than the earlier expectations in their birth cohort, and more often than intended, they remained childless. The results reveal distinct regional patterns, which are most apparent for childlessness. The gap between intended and actual childlessness is widest in the Southern European and the German-speaking countries and smallest in the Central and Eastern European countries. Additionally, we analyze the aggregate intentions-fertility gap among women with different levels of education. The gap is largest among highly educated women in most countries studied and the educational gradient varies by region, most distinctively for childlessness. Differences between countries suggest that contextual factors—norms about parenthood, work–family policies, unemployment—shape women’s fertility goals, total family size, and the gap between them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pakulski, J., Best, H., Christmas-Best, & Horrman-Lange, U. (2012) · eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · Cited by 1,785
Population and Development Review
(2010) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/(issn)1728-4457 · Cited by 1,340
Re‐theorizing Family Demographics
Esping‐Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x · Cited by 763
Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2002) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s001480100078 · Cited by 622
Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions
Adser�, A. (2004) · Journal of Population Economics · doi:10.1007/s00148-003-0166-x · Cited by 596
Lifestyle Preferences as Determinants of Women's Differentiated Labor Market Careers
HAKIM, C. (2002) · Work and Occupations · doi:10.1177/0730888402029004003 · Cited by 481
Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies
Bongaarts, J. (1998) · doi:10.31899/pgy6.1015 · Cited by 374
Luci-Greulich, A., & Thévenon, O. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9295-4 · Cited by 367
The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued
Zelizer, V. A., Crittenden, A., Folbre, N., & Williams, J. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089463 · Cited by 348
The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued
Crittenden, A. (2001) · Cited by 343
Cited by
What makes a good mother? Two decades of research reflecting social norms of motherhood
Schmidt, E., Décieux, F., Zartler, U., & Schnor, C. (2023) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12488 · Cited by 198
The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review
Thomas, J., Rowe, F., Williamson, P., & Lin, E. S. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w · Cited by 134
Delayed first births and completed fertility across the 1940–1969 birth cohorts
Beaujouan, E., Zeman, K., & Nathan, M. (2023) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2023.48.15 · Cited by 29
Self-citationShould we be concerned about low fertility? A discussion of six possible arguments
Kravdal, Ø. (2025) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2025.53.14 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaujouan, E., & Berghammer, C.
- Venue
- Population Research and Policy Review
- Published
- 2019-02-25
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 507-535
- ISSN
- 0167-5923 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7829
- OpenAlex
- W2916401603
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 37.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gap Between Lifetime Fertility Intentions and Completed Fertility in Europe and the United States: A Cohort Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3
- The paper
- Beaujouan, E., & Berghammer, C. (2019). The Gap Between Lifetime Fertility Intentions and Completed Fertility in Europe and the United States: A Cohort Approach. Population Research and Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.