Cited by 69

Flux balance analysis of Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG under photoautotrophic and heterotrophic growth conditions

Muthuraj, Muthusivaramapandian, Palabhanvi, Basavaraj, Misra, Shamik, Kumar, Vikram, Sivalingavasu, Kumaran, Das, Debasish·2013·Photosynthesis Research

Abstract

Quantification of carbon flux distribution in the metabolic network of microalgae remains important to understand the complex interplay between energy metabolism, carbon fixation, and assimilation pathways. This is even more relevant with respect to cyclic metabolism of microalgae under light-dark cycle. In the present study, flux balance analysis (FBA) was carried out for an indigenous isolate Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG under photoautotrophic and heterotrophic growth conditions. A shift in intracellular flux distribution was predicted during transition from nutrient sufficient phase to nutrient starvation phase of growth. Further, dynamic flux analysis (dFBA) was carried out to capture light-dark metabolism over discretized pseudo steady state time intervals. Our key findings include the following: (i) unlike heterotrophic condition, oxidative pentose phosphate (PP) pathway, and Krebs cycle were relatively inactive under photoautotrophic growth; (ii) in both growth conditions, while transhydrogenation reaction was highly active, glyoxalate shunt was found to be nonoperative; (iii) flux distribution during transition period was marked with up regulation of carbon flux toward nongrowth associated (NGA) maintenance energy, oxidative phosphorylation, and photophosphorylation; (iv) redirection of carbon flux from polysaccharide and neutral lipid resulted in up regulation of Krebs cycle flux in the dark phase; (v) elevated glycolytic and acetyl-CoA flux were coupled with induction of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11120-013-9943-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muthuraj, M., Palabhanvi, B., Misra, S., Kumar, V., Sivalingavasu, K., & Das, D.
Venue
Photosynthesis Research
Published
2013-10-19
Volume
118
Issue
1-2
Pages
167-179
ISSN
  • 0166-8595
  • 1573-5079
Cited by
69
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review