Cited by 47Health Policy Implementation ScienceCommunity Health and DevelopmentSchool Health and Nursing Education

Effects of Communities That Care on the Adoption and Implementation Fidelity of Evidence-Based Prevention Programs in Communities: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Fagan, Abigail A., Arthur, Michael W., Hanson, Koren, Briney, John S., Hawkins, J. David·2011·Prevention Science

Abstract

This paper describes findings from the Community Youth Development Study (CYDS), a randomized controlled trial of the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system, on the adoption and implementation fidelity of science-based prevention programming in 24 communities. Data were collected using the Community Resource Documentation (CRD), which entailed a multi-tiered sampling process and phone and web-based surveys with directors of community-based agencies and coalitions, school principals, service providers, and teachers. Four years after the initiation of the CTC prevention system, the results indicated increased use of tested, effective prevention programs in the 12 CTC intervention communities compared to the 12 control communities, and significant differences favoring the intervention communities in the numbers of children and families participating in these programs. Few significant differences were found regarding implementation quality; respondents from both intervention and control communities reported high rates of implementation fidelity across the services provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-011-0226-5

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When structural-level constructs are deemed to be important determinants of implementation outcomes, researchers conducting implementation trials may simply opt to control for these factors in their study designs by stratifying or matching organizations on these characteristics rather than measuring them.

    “Alternatively, when structural-level constructs are deemed to be important determinants of implementation outcomes, researchers conducting implementation trials may simply opt to control for these factors in their study designs by stratifying or matching organizations on these characteristics [70] rather than measuring them.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fagan, A. A., Arthur, M. W., Hanson, K., Briney, J. S., & Hawkins, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Fagan, Abigail A.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2011-06-11
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
223-234
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2008322964
Cited by
46
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015183, R01 DA10768-01A1, R01DA010768)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
Communities That Care, evidence-based prevention programs, program adoption, implementation fidelity, community-based prevention, community coalitions, youth development
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Preventive Health Services, Internet, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review