The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review
Open accessAbstract
With Covid-19 having caused significant disruption to the global education system, researchers are beginning to become concerned with the impact that this has had on student learning progress and, in particular, whether learning loss has been experienced. To evaluate this, the authors conducted a thorough analysis of recorded learning loss evidence documented between March 2020 and March 2021. This systematic review aims to consolidate available data and to document what has been reported in the literature. Given the novelty of the subject, eight studies were identified; seven of these found evidence of student learning loss among at least some of the participants while one of the seven also found instances of learning gains in a particular subgroup. The remaining study found increased learning gains in their participants. Additionally, four of the studies observed increases in inequality where certain demographics of students experienced learning losses more significant than others. It is determined that further research is needed to increase the quantity of studies produced, their geographical focus, and the numbers of students they observe.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
27 Not checked yet · 9 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 5 Own method · 2 No basis given
In the paper
“Tomasik, Helbling, and Moser (2020) found learning progress of primary-school students in Switzerland during in-person learning to be more than twice as high compared to the progress made during the eight-week school closure.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tomasik, Helbling, & Moser (2020) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Engzell et al. (2021) determined that losses were up to 60 percent larger among students from uneducated homes.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Engzell et al. (2021)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After this screening process, eight articles remained (Table 1).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Given the novelty of the subject, eight studies were identified”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“Maldonado and De Witte (2020) found Grade 6 students in Belgium experienced losses of 0.19 SD in math and 0.29 SD in Dutch.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maldonado & De Witte (2020)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The remaining study found increased learning gains in their participants.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The remaining study observed learning gains among university students.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
In the paper
“Orlov et al. (2020) determined that economics students at four USA universities were 0.19 SD behind.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Orlov et al. (2020)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Schult, Mahler, Fauth, and Lindner (2021) find learning losses of 0.07 SD in reading comprehension, 0.09 in operations, and 0.03 in numbers for Grade 5 students in Germany.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schult, Mahler, Fauth, & Lindner (2021)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These observed losses are occurring across a range of subjects, grade levels, and geographical regions.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Schult, Mahler, Fauth, and Lindner (2021) find learning losses of 0.07 SD in reading comprehension, 0.09 in operations, and 0.03 in numbers for Grade 5 students in Germany.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schult, Mahler, Fauth, & Lindner (2021)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Schult, Mahler, Fauth, and Lindner (2021) find learning losses of 0.07 SD in reading comprehension, 0.09 in operations, and 0.03 in numbers for Grade 5 students in Germany.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schult, Mahler, Fauth, & Lindner (2021)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- It may state two separate claims as one. 6
In the paper
“both Maldonado and De Witte (2020) as well as Kuhfeld et al. (2020) found learning losses in certain subjects but insignificant impacts in others.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maldonado & De Witte (2020)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, four of the studies observed increases in inequality where certain demographics of students experienced learning losses more significant than others.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Of the eight studies, four found instances of inequality”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
In the paper
“Gore et al. (2021) found instances of increased inequality as well as instances of no change.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gore et al. (2021) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“both Maldonado and De Witte (2020) as well as Kuhfeld et al. (2020) found learning losses in certain subjects but insignificant impacts in others.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuhfeld et al. (2020)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When conducting the search analysis, thousands of articles were identified; however, the majority of these pertained to hypothesized or predicted learning loss.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, the literature representing the impact that Covid-19 has had on student learning progress is limited in the quantity of studies available, geographical regions analyzed, and number of participating students.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Currie and Thomas (2001) put this into perspective because they observe that a 0.20 standard deviation (SD) decrease in standardized test scores could decrease future employment probability by 0.86 percent.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Currie and Thomas (2001)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The initial search was performed using English-language articles published between March 1, 2020, and March 18, 2021.”
- Also stated in: § Methodology · plain
“To ensure a comprehensive, multidisciplinary search, the electronic databases included were ECONLIT, Google Scholar, PubMed, Education Resources Information Center, and Cochrane Library.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Methodology · plain
In the paper
“Likewise, another year of schooling is, on average, associated with an 8–9 percent gain in future earnings (Psacharopoulos & Patrinos, 2018).”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Psacharopoulos & Patrinos (2018) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To conduct the search, the keywords “Covid-19”, “coronavirus”, “2019-ncov”, “sars-cov-2”, or “cov-19”, were used in combination with “learning loss”, “learning slide”, “education gap”, or “achievement gap”.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of its kind.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To narrow this down to studies with recorded results, article abstracts were then screened.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies that conducted student analyses and reported impacts on learning progress (either positive, negative, or insignificant) as a result of Covid-19 school disruptions were included.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Additionally, Chetty et al. (2014) observe that increasing student achievement by 0.20 SD results on average in a 2.6 percent increase in annual lifetime earnings (Maldonado & De Witte, 2020).”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chetty et al. (2014) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Factors for rejecting studies from our review included the absence of student analyses or recorded impacts on learning progress, analyses occurring before the onset of Covid-19, or hypothesized results.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Methodology
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This signals that although robust and empirical research on Covid-19-related student learning loss is limited, learning loss itself may not be.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The learning losses reported in the included studies are attributable to Covid-19 school disruptions rather than other factors.
- Rests on an assumption: The findings of the included studies are valid and reliable enough to support the review's conclusions.
- Rests on an assumption: The included studies' measures of learning loss are comparable enough to be synthesized.
The paper relies on this without support.
The learning losses reported in the included studies are attributable to Covid-19 school disruptions rather than other factors.
“Covid-19-related student learning loss”
The paper relies on this without support.
The findings of the included studies are valid and reliable enough to support the review's conclusions.
“the early findings of seven studies provide evidence of experienced learning losses”
The paper relies on this without support.
The included studies' measures of learning loss are comparable enough to be synthesized.
“These observed losses are occurring across a range of subjects, grade levels, and geographical regions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, there are several systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and these suggest an average learning loss attributable to COVID-19 school closures of 0.17 of a standard deviation—that is, at least one-third of a year’s worth of learning16–20.”
From COVID-19, school closures, and student learning outcomes. New global evidence from PISA (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, our results are similar to what systematic reviews are finding learning16–20,44,45.”
From COVID-19, school closures, and student learning outcomes. New global evidence from PISA (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“While in the literature there is already a relatively large consensus that student learning suffered a setback due to Covid-19, as pointed out by several researchers (e.g., Donnelly & Patrinos, 2022; Patrinos et al., 2022)”
From The impact of Covid-19 on student achievement: Evidence from a recent meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Donnelly & Patrinos, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Discussion
“The only limited information that is currently available is from Belgium, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Spain, the United States, and Australia.”
§ Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review > Analytical review
“| Schult, Mahler, Fauth, & Lindner (2021) | Germany | 8.5 weeks | Primary (Grade 5) | Reading | 0.07 SD | Yes | 80,000 students |”
Citations
Cites
Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2022376118 · Cited by 1,848 · cited 1×
“Engzell, Frey, and Verhagen (2021) find that, overall, Grade 4–7 students in the Netherlands have encountered an average 0.08 SD learning loss in math, spelling, and reading.”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ve4z7 · Cited by 1,739
Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2633 · Cited by 1,717
Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018) · Education Economics · doi:10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426 · Cited by 869 · cited 2×
“Likewise, another year of schooling is, on average, associated with an 8–9 percent gain in future earnings (Psacharopoulos & Patrinos, 2018).”
Self-citationInfluence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education
Gonzalez, T., de la Rubia, M. A., Hincz, K. P., Comas-Lopez, M., Subirats, L., Fort, S., & Sacha, G. M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239490 · Cited by 743 · cited 2×
“Gore et al. (2021) found Year 3 students studying math in low ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage) schools in Australia to be two months behind the progress students made in 2019.”
BackgroundThe effect of school closures on standardised student test outcomes
Maldonado, J. E., & De Witte, K. (2022) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3754 · Cited by 499
Goldemberg, D., Azevedo, J. P., Iqbal, S. A., Hasan, A., & Geven, K. (2020) · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-9284 · Cited by 476
Tomasik, M. J., Helbling, L. A., & Moser, U. (2021) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12728 · Cited by 378 · cited 1×
“Tomasik, Helbling, and Moser (2020) found learning progress of primary-school students in Switzerland during in-person learning to be more than twice as high compared to the progress made during the eight-week school closure.”
ResultReturns to investment in education
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (1993) · Cited by 352
Self-citationHasan, A., Azevedo, J. P., Goldemberg, D., Geven, K., & Iqbal, S. A. (2021) · doi:10.1596/40037 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–444 of 444
Early childhood development renaissance: Parents’ visions and values in the post-pandemic era
Chigonda, G. K., Phatudi, N. C., & Phala, T. (2025) · South African Journal of Childhood Education · doi:10.4102/sajce.v15i1.1701
On Working Toward Equitable Learning Communities: Thinking Across National Borders
Crandall, J., & Easterling, P. H. L. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80592-459-320251022
Diagnosing Learning Losses and Developing Effective Strategies: Insights from Educators
Karadağ, R., Kuşdemir, Y., & Çelık, S. (2025) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.25.80.12.6
Lohmann, C., & Haller, T. (2025) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101106
Determinants of secondary school student performance during the COVID-19 closure in Bhutan
Hayashi, R., Javier, X., Raitzer, D. A., & Thomas, M. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103443
Hall, A. G., & Smith, K. B. (2025) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129251398531
Thompson, E., Sofo, S. S., Tomchuk, D., Schneider, K. R., Ramos, A. R., & Chung, S. (2025) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112929
Teachers’ emotional appraisals and the reframing of student change in post-pandemic schools
Gaines, R., Chang, M., Palmer, M., & Mosley, K. C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1720307 · Cited by 3
A large-scale high-stakes university admission exam: pre- and trans-pandemic comparison
Mendiola, M. S., García-Minjares, M., Casanova, E. R. B., & Martínez-González, A. (2025) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2025.2608787 · Cited by 1
Summer learning loss: a scoping review (2014–2023)
Pastore, S., Passalacqua, F., & Sbravati, G. (2026) · Educational Research for Policy and Practice · doi:10.1007/s10671-025-09409-7 · Cited by 1
Duval, S., Lehrer, J. S., & Côté, A. (2024) · Revue internationale de communication et socialisation · doi:10.7202/1122456ar
Impact of Cognitive Factors and Personality Traits on Student Outcomes in a Business Course
Mitra, S. (2026) · International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design · doi:10.4018/ijopcd.402197
Mutlu, Y., Kalaycı, Ö., ÖTKEN, Ş., et al. (2026) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2025.2607038
Cooper, J. M., Holmes, S. R., Preast, J. L., Bloomfield, B. S., & Smith, T. E. (2026) · Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation · doi:10.1080/10474412.2026.2634040
Zengi̇n, E., & Papadakis, S. (2026) · Early Childhood Education Journal · doi:10.1007/s10643-026-02165-0
Pansu, P., Núñez‐Regueiro, F., de Place, A., Bouffard, T., Bressoux, P., Mella, N., & Desrichard, O. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320260000023007 · Cited by 1
Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0749-742320260000023004
Yılmaz, T. Y., Oğuzcan, H. M., Yücedağ, S., Yalçın, S., & Akarsu, Z. (2026) · Batı Anadolu eğitim bilimleri dergisi · doi:10.51460/baebd.1756914
Mukuna, K. R., & Mukuna, K. R. (2026) · International Journal of Studies in Sexuality Education · doi:10.66434/ijsse.507
Acuña, A. R., & Diquito, T. J. A. (2026) · doi:10.69739/jsdl.v1i1.1776
Luo, Q., Lim, G., & (27728), Q. W. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107213
Bijou, N., Liouaeddine, M., & Bijou, M. (2026) · Child Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s12187-026-10397-0
Dizon, J., & Aries, J. (2026) · WORLD EDUCATION CONNECT MULTIDISCIPLINARY E-PUBLICATION · doi:10.65494/pinagpalapublishing.364
Pernantah, P. S., Supriatna, N., Komalasari, K., Siti Nurbayani, K., & Putriani, A. (2026) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2026.2690814
“Papan Antik” media as an effort to support education for sustainable development
Astuti, R., Nurmitasari, Khasanah, B. A., Putri, F. A., Sari, W. P., & Pasha, M. K. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0330653
Computer-based literacy support in Trinidad and Tobago: evidence from school interventions
de Galbert, P., Glave, C. Z., Bonterre, C., & Broadbelt, A. (2026) · Caribbean Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1108/cerj-04-2026-0006
Utilizing Teamwork in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Study
Onder-Ozdemir, N., & Özdemir, H. (2026) · Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.15285/maruaebd.1513449
Helal, A. M., Wai, J., Parra-Martínez, F. A., McKenzie, S., & Seaton, D. (2026) · journal for the education of the gifted · doi:10.1177/01623532261459485
Brown, T., Krupar, A., & Khan, F. (2026) · Journal on Education in Emergencies · doi:10.33682/20wu-ezkv
Beyond Learning Loss: Student School Experiences Before, During, and After the Pandemic
Carey, A. J., Schneider, J., & Hsu, H.-Y. M. (2026) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/08959048261461466
Education Recovery In Conflict-Affected Settings
Willis, A. S. (2026) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma · doi:10.1007/s40653-026-00944-w
The long road back: a longitudinal qualitative investigation of teacher experiences through COVID-19
Keese, J., McIntush, K., & Waxman, H. C. (2026) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2026.2703802
Häll, C., Lindskog, A., & Lundin, M. (2026) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2026.102818 · Cited by 1
A Case Study of Principal Preparation in a Social Justice-Informed Principal Preparation Program
Golieb, K. (2026) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · doi:10.56902/etdcrp.2026.87
Diazgranados, S., & Thuo, B. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103569
Zhao, N. (2026) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · doi:10.56902/etdcrp.2026.127
EFL teachers’expectation and recommendation: Intercultural curriculum implementation
Junining, E., & Rohmah, Z. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Science Journal · doi:10.31893/multiscience.2027017
Simbahon, M. J. L. (2026) · International Journal of Sustainable and Integrated Studies · doi:10.65339/ijsis.v1.i2.65
No Recovery from the COVID-Slide Yet: The Reading Skills of Undergraduate Students
Kuperman, V., Thériault, K., Taler, V., & Geva, E. (2026) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2026.2721437
Addressing the problem of “problem solving”
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2026) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-026-01842-z
Pedró, F. (2026) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/s41307-026-00479-7
Roh, K. H., Lee, Y. H., Melhuish, K., & Austin, C. (2026) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-026-10565-7
Kampylis, P., Fragkiadaki-Theodoroulea, M., Kandila, M., & Sampson, D. G. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1892028
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- World Bank (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patrinos, Harry Anthony
- Venue
- PROSPECTS
- Published
- 2021-11-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 601-609
- ISSN
- 0033-1538 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-9090
- PMC
- PMC8579897
- OpenAlex
- W3160694446
- Semantic Scholar
- 0f30b9581217f4e6d54a5edfe4218c1f0bacbcd6
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 20.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Prospects (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Keywords
- learning loss, COVID-19 pandemic, student learning progress, educational disruption, learning gains, educational inequality, student demographics, school closures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
