Cited by 378Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline Learning Methods and InnovationsE-Learning and COVID-19

Educational gains of in‐person vs. distance learning in primary and secondary schools: A natural experiment during the COVID ‐19 pandemic school closures in Switzerland

Open access
Tomasik, Martin J., Helbling, Laura A., Moser, Urs·2021·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Using data from a computer-based formative feedback system, we compare learning gains in the 8 weeks of school closures related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland with learning gains in the 8 weeks before these school closures. The school performance in mathematics and language of N = 28,685 pupils is modelled in second-order piecewise latent growth models with strict measurement invariance for the two periods under investigation. While secondary school pupils remain largely unaffected by the school closures in terms of learning gains, for primary school pupils learning slows down and at the same time interindividual variance in learning gains increases. Distance learning arrangements seem an effective means to substitute for in-person learning, at least in an emergency situation, but not all pupils benefit to the same degree.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijop.12728

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children from families with low SES are less likely to have access to remote learning, are less often provided with active learning assistance from their schools, and spend less time on learning than children from families with high SES.

    “Children from families with a low SES are less likely to have access to remote learning (UNESCO, 2021), are less often provided with active learning assistance from their schools (Tomasik et al., 2020), and spend less time on learning (Meeter, 2021) than children from families with a high SES.”
  • Younger children were more negatively affected in their learning than older children were (−0.37 SD vs. −0.10 SD; Tomasik et al., 2020).

    “First, the main finding was that younger children were more negatively affected in their learning than older children were (-0.37 SD vs.−0.10 SD; Tomasik et al., 2020).”
  • The difference in augmented learning between face-to-face and distance teaching is ∆χ2(1) = 8.86 and is significant (p < 0.001).

    “This difference of ∆χ 2 (1) = 8.86 is significant (p < 0.001) [13] (p. 6).”
  • Particularly inter-individual differences in learning increased sharply during the time of distance learning.

    “Tomasik et al. [13] point out that particularly inter-individual differences in learning increased sharply during the time of distance learning and that a decrease in the augmented learning can have negative long-term consequences [13] (p. 7).”
  • Tomasik, Helbling, and Moser (2020) reported that primary-school students in Switzerland made more than twice as much progress during in-person learning as during the eight-week school closure.

    “Tomasik, Helbling, and Moser (2020) found learning progress of primary-school students in Switzerland during in-person learning to be more than twice as high compared to the progress made during the eight-week school closure.”

    From Learning loss during Covid-19: An early systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Tomasik, Helbling, & Moser (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomasik, M. J., Helbling, L. A., & Moser, U.
Affiliations
Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Corresponding author
Tomasik, Martin J.
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-24
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
566-576
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W3106617860
Cited by
378
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 1
FWCI
97.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online Learning Methods and Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 school closures, distance education, in-person learning, learning gains, elementary school students, high school students, mathematics achievement, language achievement, measurement invariance, emergency remote education, Switzerland
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, COVID-19, Adolescent, Child, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Schools, Switzerland, Education, Distance, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review