Cited by 35Global Education and MulticulturalismPeace and Human Rights EducationCitizenship Education and Democracy

Exploring values and knowledge in global citizenship education: Theoretical and empirical insights from scholars worldwide

Open access
Bosio, Emiliano, Torres, Carlos Alberto, Gaudelli, William·2023·PROSPECTS

Abstract

Global Citizenship Education (GCE) has garnered increasing attention over the past two decades as a means of enabling learners to develop an understanding of diverse global, national, and local issues.The conceptualization of GCE has evolved through scholarly discourse, encompassing theoretical perspectives ranging from neoliberal to critical orientations (Giroux & Bosio, 2021;Torres & Bosio, 2020).A widely adopted definition of GCE, put forth by UNESCO (2015, p. 15), describes it as the cultivation of "knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes that learners need to be able to contribute to a more inclusive, just, and peaceful world".In the past two decades, numerous countries have begun implementing GCE in both primary and secondary schools as well as universities, aiming to cultivate globally aware students.These initiatives take various forms and can be implemented through formal national policies, local initiatives, or the initiatives of individual academics (Bosio, 2021a(Bosio, , 2021b)).However, there is a paucity of research on how educators worldwide perceive GCE and integrate it into their curricula and classroom practices.This special issue of Prospects brings together theoretical and empirical perspectives from leading scholars in both the Global North and the Global South to discuss how they understand the values and knowledge associated with GCE, and how their pedagogical

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11125-023-09658-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical GCE goes beyond the banking model of education by emphasizing a global ethic.

    “Guided by those principles, ethical GCE goes beyond the banking model of education by emphasizing a global ethic (Bosio et al., 2023).”

    From Civic education in a new post-democratic context: The need to revitalize a dialogic and cooperative pedagogy for global citizenship (2025) · cites this paper as Bosio et al., 2023

    The passage labeled Abstract says GCE goes beyond mere knowledge acquisition and links its goals to a global ethic. It also describes ethical GCE as values-based. Our copy does not mention the banking model of education or explicitly contrast ethical GCE with it, so that specific comparison is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bosio, E. (Ed.) (2021a). Conversations on global citizenship education: Perspectives on research, teaching, and learning in higher education. Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4324/ 97804 29346 897 · DOI
  2. Bosio, E. (2021b). Global human resources or critical global citizens? An inquiry into the perspectives of Japanese university educators on global citizenship education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09566-6. · DOI
  3. Bosio, E., & Torres, C. A. (2019). Global citizenship education: An educational theory of the common good? A conversation with Carlos Alberto Torres. Policy Futures in Education, 17(6), 745-760. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14782 10319 825517. · DOI
  4. Bosio, E., & Schattle, H. (2021). Ethical global citizenship education: From neoliberalism to a values-based pedagogy. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09571-9. · DOI
  5. Duarte, J. (2021). "Global citizenship means different things to different people": Visions and implementa- tion of global citizenship education in Dutch secondary education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09595-1. · DOI
  6. Dominici, P. (2022). The weak link of democracy and the challenges of educating toward global citizenship. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-022-09607-8. · DOI
  7. Elerian, M., & Solomou, E. A. (2022). International schools, international mindedness, and the develop- ment of global citizenship: Reflections from a case study of international schools in Cyprus. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09585-3. · DOI
  8. Elkorghli, E. A. B., & Bagley, S. S. (2022). Cognitive mapping of critical global citizenship education: Con- versations with teacher educators in Norway. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-022-09624-7. · DOI
  9. Giroux, H. A., & Bosio, E. (2021). Critical pedagogy and global citizenship education. In E. Bosio (Ed.), Conversations on global citizenship education: Perspectives on research, teaching, and learning in higher education (pp. 1-10). Routledge. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4324/ 97804 29346 897-1 · DOI
  10. Hayden, M. J. (2022). Moral agonism: Acknowledging the moral in global citizenship education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-022-09603-y. · DOI
  11. Hong, Y. (2022). How will a conceptualized GCE curriculum function within Chinese secondary schools? Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09596-0. · DOI
  12. Kasa, T., Karilainen, L., Rajala, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (2022). Finnish UNESCO school educators' under- standing of global citizenship education: Analysis through typologies, ecosocial understanding, and human rights. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09597-z. · DOI
  13. Le, H. M., & Duong, B. H. (2022). Global citizenship education in Vietnam: Exploring contested terrains for a new ideal citizen. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09593-3. · DOI
  14. MacCallum, C., Mkubwa, S., Maslin, R., & Shone, N. (2022). Global citizenship education in prac- tice: A transformative approach to global learning in Zanzibar. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-022-09600-1. · DOI
  15. O'Cadiz, M. D. P., Pescador, O., Schugurensky, D., & Torres, C. A. (2022). Teaching values, valuing expe- rience: A pedagogical model from the Global South to address the ethical dimension of citizenship education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09592-4. · DOI
  16. Portera, A. (2021). Global versus intercultural citizenship education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09577-3. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Saperstein, E. (2022). Post-pandemic citizenship: The next phase of global citizenship education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09594-2. · DOI
  18. Torres, C. A., & Bosio, E. (2020). Global citizenship education at the crossroads: Globalization, global commons, common good, and critical consciousness. Prospects, 48, 99-113. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-019-09458-w. · DOI
  19. van der Walt, J. L., & Wolhuter, C. C. (2021). Global citizenship education in a space of "flow." Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09581-7. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Veugelers, W., & Bosio, E. (2021). Linking moral and social-political perspectives in global citizenship edu- cation: A conversation with Wiel Veugelers. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09576-4. · DOI
  21. Witt, A. (2022). Postpandemic futures of global citizenship education for preservice teachers: Challenges and possibilities. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-022-09599-5. · DOI
  22. Yamada, R. (2021). Planned thinking and democratic personality: Karl Mannheim's legacy for global citi- zenship education today. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09573-7. · DOI
  23. Yemini, M. (2021). Rethinking the sacred truths of global citizenship education: A theoretical exploration. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09587-1. · DOI
  24. Zembylas, M. (2021). Affective governmentality, political sensitivity, and right-wing populism: Toward a political grammar of feelings in democratic education. Prospects. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11125-021-09569-3. · DOI

Authors
Bosio, E., Torres, C. A., & Gaudelli, W.
Affiliations
  • Toyo University (JP)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Corresponding author
Torres, Carlos Alberto
Venue
PROSPECTS
Published
2023-10-16
Volume
53
Issue
3-4
Pages
195-202
ISSN
  • 0033-1538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9090
OpenAlex
W4387673373
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 2
FWCI
15.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Prospects (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peace and Human Rights Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
Keywords
global citizenship education, values, knowledge, critical pedagogy, neoliberalism in education, curriculum integration, teacher perceptions, inclusive education, peace education, Global North and Global South

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review