Cited by 367Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The impact of social isolation on the health status and health-related quality of life of older people

Hawton, Annie, Green, Colin, Dickens, Andy P., Richards, Suzanne H., Taylor, Rod S., Edwards, Rachel, Greaves, Colin J., Campbell, John L.·2011·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose To investigate for socially isolated older people, and older people at risk of social isolation: (1) health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL); (2) the relationship between social isolation and health status/HRQL; (3) the relationship between two alternative measures of health status/HRQL.Methods Older people at risk of social isolation (n = 393) completed the EQ-5D and the SF-12. Multiple regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between levels of social isolation and health status/HRQL, controlling for demographic/clinical characteristics. The agreement between EQ-5D and SF-6D (SF-12) scores was explored using descriptive psychometric techniques.Results Health status and health state values were much lower than UK general population age-matched norms. After controlling for depression, physical co-morbidities, age, gender, living alone status, employment and accommodation, social isolation was significantly associated, to a degree that was clinically relevant, with EQ-5D DSI, SF-6D (SF-12) and SF-12 MCS scores. The potential for ceiling effects on the EQ-5D with this population was identified.Conclusion This work highlights the burden that social isolation may have on the health and well-being of older people. The potential HRQL gains from addressing social isolation may be considerable, with those at risk of social isolation also a key target group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-010-9717-2

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawton, A., Green, C., Dickens, A. P., Richards, S. H., Taylor, R. S., Edwards, R., Greaves, C. J., & Campbell, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Hawton, Annie
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2010-07-25
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
57-67
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W1966550887
Cited by
367
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
social isolation, older adults, health-related quality of life, health status, EQ-5D, SF-12, SF-6D, ceiling effect, depression, somatic comorbidity, living alone
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Social Isolation, Stress, Psychological, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review