Cited by 50Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesTechnology Use by Older Adults

Home but still engaged: participation in social activities among the homebound

Open access
Szanton, Sarah L., Roberts, Laken, Leff, Bruce, Walker, Janiece L., Seplaki, Christopher L., Soones, Tacara, Thorpe, Roland J., Ornstein, Katherine A.·2016·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: Participation in social and community activities that require leaving one's home is important to older adults; however, many older adults have difficulty or are unable to leave their dwellings, and little is known from national samples about issues related to remaining active outside the home or the barriers faced by these older adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative study of older adults (n = 7197), to understand the following: (1) the importance that homebound and semi-homebound adults place on involvement in social or community activities, (2) their current level of involvement, and (3) reported barriers to participation. RESULTS: Despite the heavy burden of functional limitations, depression, pain, and falls, homebound adults reported that activities outside the home were important to them ranging from 25.2 % (attend clubs) to 70.0 % (visit family). Similarly, semi-homebound older adults had a strong interest in such participation, including visiting friends and family (81.8 %), attending religious services (72.6 %), and going out for enjoyment (72.5 %). Many homebound adults reported health (42.9-64.1 % depending on the activity) and transportation (12.2-18.2 %) as barriers to participation. Semi-homebound adults also identified health (23.8-41.0 %) and transportation (6.5-10.2 %) as participation barriers. IMPLICATIONS: This information can be useful in designing community programs that will foster meaningful social and community engagement for older adults, which may improve their quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-016-1245-2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to participating in community programming pre-dated the COVID-19 pandemic, as most community programs were offered in-person, posing a significant barrier for older adults who experience challenges with participating in activities outside of their homes.

    “Barriers to participating in community programming pre-dated the COVID-19 pandemic, as most community programs were offered in-person, posing a significant barrier for older adults who experience challenges with participating in activities outside of their homes (37–42).”

    From Telephone-based group mental health support for older adults in central Canada: pilot acceptability and effectiveness findings of The CONNECT Program (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szanton, S. L., Roberts, L., Leff, B., Walker, J. L., Seplaki, C. L., Soones, T., Thorpe, R. J., & Ornstein, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Szanton, Sarah L.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1913-1920
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2287480988
Cited by
50
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG040100)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
homebound older adults, social participation (health and rehabilitation), community participation, barriers to participation, transportation barriers, functional limitations, depression, falls, quality of life, National Health and Aging Trends Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Residence Characteristics, Social Behavior, Homebound Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review