Cited by 31Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomesFrailty in Older Adults

The Association Between Income and Incident Homebound Status Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries

Open access
Ornstein, Katherine A., Garrido, Melissa M., Bollens‐Lund, Evan, Reckrey, Jennifer M., Husain, Mohammed, Ferreira, Katelyn B., Liu, Shelley H., Ankuda, Claire K. +2 more·2020·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: A large and growing population of older adults with multimorbidity, cognitive impairment, and functional disability live in the community, but many never or rarely leave their homes. Being homebound is associated with decreased access to medical services, poor health outcomes, and increased mortality. Yet, it is unknown what factors, in particular socioeconomic factors, are associated with new onset of homebound status. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between income and risk of becoming homebound. DESIGN: Observational cohort study using 2011 to 2018 data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. SETTING: Population‐based study in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7,042 initially nonhomebound community‐dwelling older adults. EXPOSURE: Total annual household income at baseline (in 2011) measured via self‐report. OUTCOME: Annual measure of homebound status, defined as leaving home an average of 1 d/wk or less. RESULTS: Over 7 years, 15.81% of older adults in the lowest income quartile (≤$15,003) became homebound, compared with only 4.64% of those in the highest income quartile (>$60,000). In a competing risks analysis accounting for risks of death and nursing home admission, and adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics, those in the lowest income quartile had a substantially higher subhazard of becoming homebound than those in the highest income quartile (1.65; 95% confidence interval = 1.20–2.29). Moreover, we see evidence of a gradient in risk of homebound status by income quartile. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our work demonstrates that financial resources shape the risk of becoming homebound, which is associated with negative health consequences. In the context of existing income disparities, more support is needed to assist older adults with limited financial resources who wish to remain in the community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.16715

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being single, financially impoverished, and socially isolated are risk factors for being homebound.

    “Being single, financially impoverished, and socially isolated are risk factors for being homebound 4 and disproportionately more common among LGBTQ + older populations.”

    From Caring for LGBTQ+ Older Adults at Home (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results (page unavailable) identify low income as a significant predictor of becoming homebound. Marital status and social isolation appear as adjustment variables, but the cited passages do not establish that being single or socially isolated are themselves risk factors. The citation is attached to the risk-factor clause, not the subsequent claim about LGBTQ+ older populations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ornstein, K. A., Garrido, M. M., Bollens‐Lund, E., Reckrey, J. M., Husain, M., Ferreira, K. B., Liu, S. H., Ankuda, C. K., Kelley, A. S., & Siu, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ornstein, Katherine A.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-10
Volume
68
Issue
11
Pages
2594-2601
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W3048637396
Cited by
31
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K24AG062785, R01AG060967, U01AG032947)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
homebound status, household income, socioeconomic status, older adults, Medicare beneficiaries, community-dwelling older adults, income inequality, multimorbidity, functional disability, cognitive impairment, nursing home admission, competing risks
MeSH terms
Economic Status, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Medicare, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, United States, Homebound Persons, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review