Cited by 53Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Impact of caregiver activities and social supports on multidimensional caregiver burden: analyses from nationally-representative surveys of cancer patients and their caregivers

Halpern, Michael T., Fiero, Mallorie H., Bell, Melanie L.·2017·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose Informal caregivers of individuals with cancer may experience substantial burdens. To develop interventions to support these caregivers, it is crucial to quantify and understand the domains of burdens potentially experienced by caregivers and factors contributing to each domain. Methods Using data from two national surveys, the National Survey of Caregiving (NSOC) linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (NHATS), we identified all participants in the NHATS diagnosed with cancer who had a caregiver participating in the NSOC. Guided by a theoretical model, twenty-two items in the NSOC related to caregiver health, mood and outlook were included in factor analysis to develop scales capturing domains of burden. Multivariable regression analyses examined whether activities performed by caregivers and supports for caregivers were associated with these burden scales. Results Analysis of responses from 373 caregivers of cancer patients identified three scales: emotional burden; psychological burden; and relationship with the patient. Providing assistance managing medical care was associated with increased emotional and psychological burden, while assistance with non-medical issues increased psychological burden and worsened relationships with patients. Caregiver provision of direct patient care activities was also associated with increased burden but improved relationships with patients. Use of caregiver supports showed mixed associations with burden. Conclusions…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-017-1505-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors like lack of training, low support availability, discrepancies between caregiver and patient reports, and challenges in managing medical and non-medical care activities contribute to increased burden.

    “Factors like lack of training, low support availability, discrepancies between caregiver and patient reports, and challenges in managing medical and non-medical care activities contribute to increased burden [5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halpern, M. T., Fiero, M. H., & Bell, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Halpern, Michael T.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1587-1595
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2588968444
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
No funding received
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
caregiver burden, informal caregivers, cancer patients, emotional burden, psychological burden, caregiver-patient relationship, social support
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, United States, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review