Impact of caregiver activities and social supports on multidimensional caregiver burden: analyses from nationally-representative surveys of cancer patients and their caregivers
Abstract
Purpose Informal caregivers of individuals with cancer may experience substantial burdens. To develop interventions to support these caregivers, it is crucial to quantify and understand the domains of burdens potentially experienced by caregivers and factors contributing to each domain. Methods Using data from two national surveys, the National Survey of Caregiving (NSOC) linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (NHATS), we identified all participants in the NHATS diagnosed with cancer who had a caregiver participating in the NSOC. Guided by a theoretical model, twenty-two items in the NSOC related to caregiver health, mood and outlook were included in factor analysis to develop scales capturing domains of burden. Multivariable regression analyses examined whether activities performed by caregivers and supports for caregivers were associated with these burden scales. Results Analysis of responses from 373 caregivers of cancer patients identified three scales: emotional burden; psychological burden; and relationship with the patient. Providing assistance managing medical care was associated with increased emotional and psychological burden, while assistance with non-medical issues increased psychological burden and worsened relationships with patients. Caregiver provision of direct patient care activities was also associated with increased burden but improved relationships with patients. Use of caregiver supports showed mixed associations with burden. Conclusions…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors like lack of training, low support availability, discrepancies between caregiver and patient reports, and challenges in managing medical and non-medical care activities contribute to increased burden.
“Factors like lack of training, low support availability, discrepancies between caregiver and patient reports, and challenges in managing medical and non-medical care activities contribute to increased burden [5].”
From Exploring the Unmet Needs of Cancer Caregivers in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Psychosomatic medicine in Germany: more timely than ever
Zipfel, S., Herzog, W., Kruse, J., & Henningsen, P. (2016) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000447701 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
Sklenarova, H., Krümpelmann, A., Haun, M. W., Friederich, H., Huber, J., Thomas, M., Winkler, E. C., Herzog, W., & Hartmann, M. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29223 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Butow, P. N., The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Price, M. A., Bell, M. L., Webb, P. M., deFazio, A., The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Quality of Life Study Investigators, & Friedlander, M. (2014) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.002 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Informal caregiver burden for solid tumour cancer patients: a review and future directions
Thana, K., Lehto, R., Sikorskii, A., & Wyatt, G. (2021) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2020.1867136 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Examining Health Behaviors of Chronic Disease Caregivers in the U.S.
Secinti, E., Wu, W., Kent, E. E., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Lewson, A. B., & Mosher, C. E. (2022) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.004 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Secinti, E., Lewson, A. B., Wu, W., Kent, E. E., & Mosher, C. E. (2021) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaab007 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Psychological predictors of quality of life among Jordanian cancer patients' caregivers
Alnajar, M., Mosleh, S., Almalik, M., & Darawad, M. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.6054 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Exploring the Unmet Needs of Cancer Caregivers in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey
Muralidharan, S., Sikalgar, F. R., B, D., Nikalje, M. R., Subramaniam, T., & Kumar, M. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.62159 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Halpern, M. T., Fiero, M. H., & Bell, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halpern, Michael T.
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2017-02-16
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1587-1595
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2588968444
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- No funding received
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, informal caregivers, cancer patients, emotional burden, psychological burden, caregiver-patient relationship, social support
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, United States, Caregivers, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review