Cited by 7Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Psychological predictors of quality of life among Jordanian cancer patients' caregivers

Alnajar, Malek, Mosleh, Sultan, Almalik, Mona, Darawad, Muhammad·2022·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: The caregivers who provide care for patients with cancer often experience emotional and psychological stressors and burdens that could be influenced by several factors, including the cultural context. This study examines the level of emotional distress and burden and their effect on the quality of life (QOL) of Jordanian cancer patients' caregivers. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among 257 family caregivers of patients at various stages of cancer. Results: The average age of caregivers was 37.5 years (SD = 12.2). Most caregivers (145; 59.2%) were female and married (168; 68.6%). About a quarter were partners (32.2%) and lived with their patients (137; 55.9%). Caregivers with a reduced overall Caregiver Quality of Life Index‐Cancer (CQOLC) score were more likely to be older, the parents of the patients, and living with patients in the same house. A significant negative relationship was found between caregivers' CQOLC and Zarit Burden Interview (r = −0.7, p = 0.001), anxiety (r = −0.69, p = 0.001), and depression (r = −0.42, p = 0.03) scores. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that burden, anxiety, and depression scores were independent predictors and explained 63% of the variance in the total CQOLC score of caregivers. Conclusion: Cancer caregivers are at elevated risk of poor QOL. Despite participants' low perception of the burden level, this study provides preliminary results for policymakers and medical practitioners to foster a comprehensive platform supporting cancer caregivers. Moreover, identifying the caregivers' readiness to provide the needed care and the availability of supportive resources, as a clinical routine, is strongly recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.6054

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alnajar, M., Mosleh, S., Almalik, M., & Darawad, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Mutah University (JO)
  • University of Jordan (JO)
Corresponding author
Alnajar, Malek
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1886-1894
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W4306405474
Cited by
7
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
cancer caregivers, family caregivers, quality of life, caregiver burden, emotional distress, anxiety, depression, Zarit Burden Interview, cultural context
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Jordan, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review