Cited by 268Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyInnovation and Socioeconomic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taking care of business: the impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs' blended value creation goals

Hechavarría, Diana M., Terjesen, Siri A., Ingram, Amy E., Renko, Maija, Justo, Rachida, Elam, Amanda·2017·Small Business Economics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11187-016-9747-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 145

  1. Abramson, P. R., Ellis, S., & Inglehart, R. (1997). Research in context: Measuring value change. Political Behavior, 19(1), 41–59. · DOI
  2. Abramson, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. · DOI
  3. Acs, Z. J. (2013). Why philanthropy matters: How the wealthy give, and what it means for our economic well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  4. Agafonow, A. (2014). Toward a positive theory of social entrepreneurship: On maximizing versus satisficing value capture. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 709–713. · DOI
  5. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188 . · DOI
  6. Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(5), 595–621. · DOI
  7. Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543. · DOI
  8. Anna, A. L., Chandler, G. N., Jansen, E., & Mero, N. P. (2000). Women business owners in traditional and non-traditional industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 279–303. · DOI
  9. Bacq, S., Hartog, C., & Hoogendoorn, B. (2013). A quantitative comparison of social and commercial entrepreneurship: Toward a more nuanced understanding of social entrepreneurship organizations in context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 40–68. · DOI
  10. Baier, A. C. (1985). What do women want in a moral theory? Nous, 19(1), 53–63. · DOI
  11. Bampton, R., & Maclagan, P. (2009). Does a ‘care orientation’explain gender differences in ethical decision making? A critical analysis and fresh findings. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 179–191. · DOI
  12. Banarjee, B., & McKeage, K. (1994). How green is my value: Exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 147–152.
  13. Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 49–56. · DOI
  14. Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 291–297.
  15. Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Schoeneberger, J. A., Loudermilk, B. L., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2010). Dancing the sample size limbo with mixed models: How low can you go. In SAS global forum, (vol. 4, pp. 11–14).
  16. Bergmann, H., & Stephan, U. (2013). Moving on from nascent entrepreneurship: Measuring cross-national differences in the transition to new business ownership. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 945–959. · DOI
  17. Bergmann, H., Mueller, S., & Schrettle, T. (2014). The use of global entrepreneurship monitor data in academic research: A critical inventory and future potentials. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6(3), 242–276. · DOI
  18. Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841–858.
  19. Bosma, N. (2013). The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and its impact on entrepreneurship research. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 1–85. · DOI
  20. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15. · DOI
  21. Braun, P. (2010). Going green: Women entrepreneurs and the environment. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 245–259. · DOI
  22. Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. Innovations, 6(3), 9–18. · DOI
  23. Bullough, A., Renko, M., & Abdelzaher, D. (2014). Women’s business ownership operating within the context of institutional and in-group collectivism. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206314561302 . · DOI
  24. Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (2012). Contemporary sociological theory. Chichester, MA: Wiley.
  25. Campbell, D. (2000). The socially constructed organization. London: Karnac Books.
  26. Campbell, R. (2004). Gender, ideology and issue preference: Is there such a thing as a political women’s interest in Britain? 1. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6(1), 20–44. · DOI
  27. Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Hierarchical analysis of SUR models with extensions to correlated serial errors and time-varying parameter models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(2), 339–360. · DOI
  28. Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I.-W. G., Stoeberl, P. A., & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea, and the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 263–287. · DOI
  29. Cliff, J. E. (1998). Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 523–542. · DOI
  30. Cohen, B., Smith, B., & Mitchell, R. (2008). Toward a sustainable conceptualization of dependent variables in entrepreneurship research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 107–119. · DOI
  31. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. · DOI
  32. Combs, J. G. (2010). Big samples and small effects: Let’s not trade relevance and rigor for power. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 9–13. · DOI
  33. Cornwall, J., & Dunlap, W. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 89–100. · DOI
  34. Crawford, G. C., Aguinis, H., Lichtenstein, B., Davidsson, P., & McKelvey, B. (2015). Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 696–713. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73–93. · DOI
  37. Davidsson, P. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments: Now Publishers Inc. MA: Hanover.
  38. Davis, D. W., & Davenport, C. (1999). Assessing the validity of the postmaterialism index. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 649–664. · DOI
  39. De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 585–593. · DOI
  40. De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2007). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(3), 323–339. · DOI
  41. Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2015) Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics, 1–37. · DOI
  42. Desa, G., & Kotha, S. (2006). Ownership mission and environment: An exploratory analysis into the evolution of a technology social venture. In Social entrepreneurship, (pp. 155–179), Palgrave Macmillan, UK · DOI
  43. Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2012). Nurturing entrepreneurs’ work–family balance: A gendered perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 513–541. · DOI
  44. Elam, A. B. (2008). Gender and entrepreneurship: A multilevel theory and analysis. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. · DOI
  45. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90. · DOI
  46. Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up, 11(12), 1–16.
  47. Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51. · DOI
  48. Erbring, L., & Young, A. A. (1979). Individuals and social structure contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods & Research, 7(4), 396–430. · DOI
  49. Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2011). Institutions and female entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 37(4), 397–415. · DOI
  50. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 479–504. · DOI
  51. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2016). Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 449-467. · DOI
  52. Flanagan, O., & Jackson, K. (1987). Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg–Gilligan debate revisited. Ethics, 97(3), 622–637. · DOI
  53. Flanagan, O., & Jackson, K. (1993). Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. In An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives, (pp. 69–86).
  54. Gatewood, E. (1993). The expectancies in public sector venture assistance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 91–96. · DOI
  55. Gatignon, H., Eliashberg, J., & Robertson, T. S. (1989). Modeling multinational diffusion patterns: An efficient methodology. Marketing Science, 8(3), 231–247. · DOI
  56. Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection a multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392–415. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  58. Gorgievski, M. J., Ascalon, M. E., & Stephan, U. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 207–232. · DOI
  59. Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2011). Which dimensions of culture matter for long-run growth? American Economic Review, 101(3), 492–498. · DOI
  60. Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397–417. · DOI
  61. Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439–448. · DOI
  62. Hamilton, E. (2013). The discourse of entrepreneurial masculinities (and femininities). Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(1–2), 90–99. · DOI
  63. Hansen, O., & Tol, R. S. (2003). A refined Inglehart index of materialism and postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, 73, 155–169.
  64. Harding, R., & Cowling, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship monitor. London: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
  65. Hauck, K., & Street, A. (2006). Performance assessment in the context of multiple objectives: A multivariate multilevel analysis. Journal of Health Economics, 25(6), 1029–1048. · DOI
  66. Hawk, T. F. (2011). An ethic of care: A relational ethic for the relational characteristics of organizations. In: Applying care ethics to business, (pp. 3–34). Dordrecht: Springer. · DOI
  67. Hayes, B. C., McAllister, I., & Studlar, D. T. (2000). Gender, postmaterialism, and feminism in comparative perspective. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 425–439. · DOI
  68. Hechavarria, D. M., Ingram, A., Justo, R., & Terjesen, S. (2012). Are women more likely to pursue social and environmental entrepreneurship. In: Global women’s entrepreneurship research: Diverse settings, questions and approaches, (pp. 135–151). · DOI
  69. Hechavarria, D. M. (2015). The impact of culture on national prevalence rates of social and commercial entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal. doi: 10.1007/s11365-015-0376-1 . · DOI
  70. Hechavarria, D. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (2009). Cultural norms & business start-ups: The impact of national values on opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 417–437. · DOI
  71. Held, V. (2005). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Hughes, K. D., & Jennings, J. E. (Eds.). (2012). Global women’s entrepreneurship research: Diverse settings, questions, and approaches. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  73. Hughes, K. D., Jennings, J. E., Brush, C., Carter, S., & Welter, F. (2012). Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 429–442. · DOI
  74. Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677–694. · DOI · Paper page
  75. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2008). Toward a model of cross-cultural business ethics: The impact of individualism and collectivism on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 293–305. · DOI
  76. Inglehart, R. (1977). Political dissatisfaction and mass support for social change in advanced industrial society. Comparative Political Studies, 10(3), 455–472. · DOI
  77. Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880–900. · DOI
  78. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (Vol. 19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215–228. · DOI
  80. Inglehart, R. (2003). Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys (Vol. 89). Leiden-Boston: Brill. · DOI
  81. Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 336–354. · DOI
  82. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 19–51. · DOI · Paper page
  83. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  84. Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703. · DOI
  85. Javidan, M., & House, R. J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 289–305. · DOI · Paper page
  86. Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715. · DOI
  87. Jennings, J. E., Jennings, P. D., & Sharifian, M. (2014). Living the dream? Assessing the “entrepreneurship as emancipation” perspective in a developed region. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. doi: 10.1111/etap.12106 . · DOI
  88. Knutsen, O. (1990). Materialist and postmaterialist values and social structure in the Nordic countries: A comparative study. Comparative Politics, 23(1), 85–104. · DOI
  89. Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and possibility: Enacting an ethic of care through narrative practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663. · DOI
  90. Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693–714. · DOI
  91. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263. · DOI
  92. Luthar, H. K., & Karri, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics education and the perception of linkage between organizational ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 353–368. · DOI
  93. Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F., & York, J. G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493–509. · DOI · Paper page
  94. Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640. · DOI
  95. Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282. · DOI
  96. Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. · DOI
  97. Pakulski, J., Tranter, B., & Crook, S. (1998). The dynamics of environmental issues in Australia: Concerns, clusters and carriers. Australian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 235–252. · DOI
  98. Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  99. Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2016). Informal institutions and their comparative influences on social and commercial entrepreneurship: The role of in-group collectivism and inter-personal trust. Journal of Small Business Management. Forthcoming. · DOI
  100. Pavlovich, K., & Corner, P. D. (2014). Conscious enterprise emergence: Shared value creation through expanded conscious awareness. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 341–351. · DOI
  101. Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570–581. · DOI
  102. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
  103. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2006). Multilevel modelling of complex survey data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(4), 805–827. · DOI
  104. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69(2), 167–190. · DOI
  105. Radtke, R. R. (2000). The effects of gender and setting on accountants’ ethically sensitive decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 299–312. · DOI
  106. Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Furrer, O., Kuo, M. H., Li, Y., Wangenheim, F., et al. (2014). Societal-level versus individual-level predictions of ethical behavior: A 48-society study of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 283–306.
  107. Reynolds, P. D. (2010). New firm creation: A global assessment of national, contextual, and individual factors. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(5–6). · DOI
  108. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998-2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231. · DOI · Paper page
  109. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. · DOI
  110. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216. · DOI · Paper page
  111. Rubin, D. B., & Schenker, N. (1987). Interval estimation from multiply-imputed data: A case study using census agriculture industry codes. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(4), 375–387.
  112. Robalino, N., & Robson, A. (2012). The economic approach to ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2224–2233. · DOI
  113. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values (Vol. 438). New York: Free Press.
  114. Roth, M. S. (1995). The effects of culture and socioeconomics on the performance of global brand image strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 163–175. · DOI
  115. Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. · DOI
  116. Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A., & Liñán, F. (2014). About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 49–66. · DOI
  117. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137–182. · DOI · Paper page
  118. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010. · DOI
  119. Shaver, K. G., Gartner, W. B., Crosby, E., Bakalarova, K., & Gatewood, E. J. (2001). Attributions about entrepreneurship: A framework and process for analyzing reasons for starting a business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(2), 5–33.
  120. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170. · DOI
  121. Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465–493. · DOI
  122. Simga-Mugan, C., Daly, B. A., Onkal, D., & Kavut, L. (2005). The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity: An application of the issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 139–159. · DOI
  123. Skoe, E. E., & Diessner, R. (1994). Ethic of care, justice, identity, and gender: An extension and replication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 272–289.
  124. Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior a 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 188–208. · DOI
  125. Smith, I. H., & Woodworth, W. P. (2012). Developing social entrepreneurs and social innovators: A social identity and self-efficacy approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 390–407. · DOI
  126. Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 0149206316633268. · DOI
  127. Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2014). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331. · DOI
  128. Sternberg, R., & Wennekers, S. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193–203. · DOI · Paper page
  129. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. Handbook of organizations, 44(2), 142–193.
  130. Terjesen, S., Bosma, N. S., & Stam, E. (2015). Advancing public policy for high growth, female, and social entrepreneurs. Public Administration Review. doi: 10.1111/puar.12472 . · DOI
  131. Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. (2016). Comparative international entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 299–344. · DOI
  132. Tinsley, C. H., Howell, T. M., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2015). Who should bring home the bacon? How deterministic views of gender constrain spousal wage preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 37–48. · DOI
  133. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  134. Uhlaner, L., & Thurik, R. (2007). Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 161–185. · DOI
  135. Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (Eds.), (2012). Green growth: managing the transition to sustainable economies. In Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy, (pp. 1–25). Berlin: Springer.
  136. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. · DOI
  137. Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2010). The embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurship in a transition context. In C. G. Brush, et al. (Eds.), Women entrepreneurs and the global environment for growth: A research perspective (pp. 96–117). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  138. Williams, C. C., & Nadin, S. (2011). Beyond the commercial versus social entrepreneurship divide: Some lessons from English localities. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(2), 118–129. · DOI
  139. Wilson, M. S. (2005). A social-value analysis of postmaterialism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2), 209–224. · DOI
  140. World Bank. (2009). World Development Indicators (WB-WDI). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
  141. York, J. G., O'Neil, I., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2016). Exploring environmental entrepreneurship: identity coupling, venture goals, and stakeholder incentives. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 695-737. · DOI
  142. Zahra, S. A., Newey, L. R., & Li, Y. (2014). On the frontiers: The implications of social entrepreneurship for international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 137–158. · DOI
  143. Zahra, S. A., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 117–131.
  144. Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368. · DOI
  145. Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hechavarría, D. M., Terjesen, S. A., Ingram, A. E., Renko, M., Justo, R., & Elam, A.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Terjesen, Siri A.
Venue
Small Business Economics
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
225-257
ISSN
  • 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0913
OpenAlex
W2467034221
Cited by
268
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
23.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small Business Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Keywords
entrepreneurs, gender gap, post-materialism, cultural values, care ethics, social value creation, environmental value creation, economic value creation, women entrepreneurs, startups, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review