The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taking care of business: the impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs' blended value creation goals
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female founders on average place greater emphasis than men on social value creation as opposed to mere profit-making.
“Turning to the personal characteristics of the entrepreneur, it has been shown that female founders on average place greater emphasis than men on social value creation as opposed to mere profit-making (Bosma et al., 2015;Hechavarría et al., 2017).”
From Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences (2021) · cites this paper as Hechavarría et al., 2017
The fact that an ecosystem with high shares of female founders must also have significant economic development (high GDP per capita) to produce sustainability-oriented ecosystems corresponds with the finding of Hechavarría et al. (2017) that female founders in post-materialist societies are more likely than men to become 'ecopreneurs'.
“Furthermore, the fact that an ecosystem with high shares of female founders must also have significant economic development (in particular, high GDP per capita) to produce sustainability-oriented ecosystems seems to correspond with the finding of Hechavarría et al. (2017) that female founders in post-materialist societies are more likely than men to become 'ecopreneurs'.”
From Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences (2021) · cites this paper as Hechavarría et al. (2017)
Citations
Cites
Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0 · Cited by 5,994
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement
Rawls, J. (2001) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0 · Cited by 5,761
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective
Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23464011 · Cited by 1,489
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 145
- Abramson, P. R., Ellis, S., & Inglehart, R. (1997). Research in context: Measuring value change. Political Behavior, 19(1), 41–59. · DOI
- Abramson, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. · DOI
- Acs, Z. J. (2013). Why philanthropy matters: How the wealthy give, and what it means for our economic well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Agafonow, A. (2014). Toward a positive theory of social entrepreneurship: On maximizing versus satisficing value capture. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 709–713. · DOI
- Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188 . · DOI
- Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(5), 595–621. · DOI
- Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543. · DOI
- Anna, A. L., Chandler, G. N., Jansen, E., & Mero, N. P. (2000). Women business owners in traditional and non-traditional industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 279–303. · DOI
- Bacq, S., Hartog, C., & Hoogendoorn, B. (2013). A quantitative comparison of social and commercial entrepreneurship: Toward a more nuanced understanding of social entrepreneurship organizations in context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 40–68. · DOI
- Baier, A. C. (1985). What do women want in a moral theory? Nous, 19(1), 53–63. · DOI
- Bampton, R., & Maclagan, P. (2009). Does a ‘care orientation’explain gender differences in ethical decision making? A critical analysis and fresh findings. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 179–191. · DOI
- Banarjee, B., & McKeage, K. (1994). How green is my value: Exploring the relationship between environmentalism and materialism. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 147–152.
- Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 49–56. · DOI
- Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 291–297.
- Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Schoeneberger, J. A., Loudermilk, B. L., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2010). Dancing the sample size limbo with mixed models: How low can you go. In SAS global forum, (vol. 4, pp. 11–14).
- Bergmann, H., & Stephan, U. (2013). Moving on from nascent entrepreneurship: Measuring cross-national differences in the transition to new business ownership. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 945–959. · DOI
- Bergmann, H., Mueller, S., & Schrettle, T. (2014). The use of global entrepreneurship monitor data in academic research: A critical inventory and future potentials. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6(3), 242–276. · DOI
- Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841–858.
- Bosma, N. (2013). The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and its impact on entrepreneurship research. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 1–85. · DOI
- Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15. · DOI
- Braun, P. (2010). Going green: Women entrepreneurs and the environment. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 245–259. · DOI
- Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. Innovations, 6(3), 9–18. · DOI
- Bullough, A., Renko, M., & Abdelzaher, D. (2014). Women’s business ownership operating within the context of institutional and in-group collectivism. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206314561302 . · DOI
- Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (2012). Contemporary sociological theory. Chichester, MA: Wiley.
- Campbell, D. (2000). The socially constructed organization. London: Karnac Books.
- Campbell, R. (2004). Gender, ideology and issue preference: Is there such a thing as a political women’s interest in Britain? 1. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 6(1), 20–44. · DOI
- Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Hierarchical analysis of SUR models with extensions to correlated serial errors and time-varying parameter models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(2), 339–360. · DOI
- Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I.-W. G., Stoeberl, P. A., & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea, and the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 263–287. · DOI
- Cliff, J. E. (1998). Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 523–542. · DOI
- Cohen, B., Smith, B., & Mitchell, R. (2008). Toward a sustainable conceptualization of dependent variables in entrepreneurship research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 107–119. · DOI
- Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49. · DOI
- Combs, J. G. (2010). Big samples and small effects: Let’s not trade relevance and rigor for power. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 9–13. · DOI
- Cornwall, J., & Dunlap, W. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 89–100. · DOI
- Crawford, G. C., Aguinis, H., Lichtenstein, B., Davidsson, P., & McKelvey, B. (2015). Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: Implications for theory and research. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 696–713. · DOI · Paper page
- Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. · DOI · Paper page
- Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73–93. · DOI
- Davidsson, P. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments: Now Publishers Inc. MA: Hanover.
- Davis, D. W., & Davenport, C. (1999). Assessing the validity of the postmaterialism index. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 649–664. · DOI
- De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 585–593. · DOI
- De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2007). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(3), 323–339. · DOI
- Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2015) Literature review of shared value: A theoretical concept or a management buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics, 1–37. · DOI
- Desa, G., & Kotha, S. (2006). Ownership mission and environment: An exploratory analysis into the evolution of a technology social venture. In Social entrepreneurship, (pp. 155–179), Palgrave Macmillan, UK · DOI
- Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2012). Nurturing entrepreneurs’ work–family balance: A gendered perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 513–541. · DOI
- Elam, A. B. (2008). Gender and entrepreneurship: A multilevel theory and analysis. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. · DOI
- Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90. · DOI
- Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up, 11(12), 1–16.
- Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51. · DOI
- Erbring, L., & Young, A. A. (1979). Individuals and social structure contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods & Research, 7(4), 396–430. · DOI
- Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2011). Institutions and female entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 37(4), 397–415. · DOI
- Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: Social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 479–504. · DOI
- Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2016). Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 449-467. · DOI
- Flanagan, O., & Jackson, K. (1987). Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg–Gilligan debate revisited. Ethics, 97(3), 622–637. · DOI
- Flanagan, O., & Jackson, K. (1993). Justice, care, and gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan debate revisited. In An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives, (pp. 69–86).
- Gatewood, E. (1993). The expectancies in public sector venture assistance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17, 91–96. · DOI
- Gatignon, H., Eliashberg, J., & Robertson, T. S. (1989). Modeling multinational diffusion patterns: An efficient methodology. Marketing Science, 8(3), 231–247. · DOI
- Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection a multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392–415. · DOI · Paper page
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Gorgievski, M. J., Ascalon, M. E., & Stephan, U. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 207–232. · DOI
- Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2011). Which dimensions of culture matter for long-run growth? American Economic Review, 101(3), 492–498. · DOI
- Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 397–417. · DOI
- Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439–448. · DOI
- Hamilton, E. (2013). The discourse of entrepreneurial masculinities (and femininities). Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(1–2), 90–99. · DOI
- Hansen, O., & Tol, R. S. (2003). A refined Inglehart index of materialism and postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, 73, 155–169.
- Harding, R., & Cowling, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship monitor. London: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
- Hauck, K., & Street, A. (2006). Performance assessment in the context of multiple objectives: A multivariate multilevel analysis. Journal of Health Economics, 25(6), 1029–1048. · DOI
- Hawk, T. F. (2011). An ethic of care: A relational ethic for the relational characteristics of organizations. In: Applying care ethics to business, (pp. 3–34). Dordrecht: Springer. · DOI
- Hayes, B. C., McAllister, I., & Studlar, D. T. (2000). Gender, postmaterialism, and feminism in comparative perspective. International Political Science Review, 21(4), 425–439. · DOI
- Hechavarria, D. M., Ingram, A., Justo, R., & Terjesen, S. (2012). Are women more likely to pursue social and environmental entrepreneurship. In: Global women’s entrepreneurship research: Diverse settings, questions and approaches, (pp. 135–151). · DOI
- Hechavarria, D. M. (2015). The impact of culture on national prevalence rates of social and commercial entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal. doi: 10.1007/s11365-015-0376-1 . · DOI
- Hechavarria, D. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (2009). Cultural norms & business start-ups: The impact of national values on opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(4), 417–437. · DOI
- Held, V. (2005). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Hughes, K. D., & Jennings, J. E. (Eds.). (2012). Global women’s entrepreneurship research: Diverse settings, questions, and approaches. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Hughes, K. D., Jennings, J. E., Brush, C., Carter, S., & Welter, F. (2012). Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 429–442. · DOI
- Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677–694. · DOI · Paper page
- Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2008). Toward a model of cross-cultural business ethics: The impact of individualism and collectivism on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 293–305. · DOI
- Inglehart, R. (1977). Political dissatisfaction and mass support for social change in advanced industrial society. Comparative Political Studies, 10(3), 455–472. · DOI
- Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880–900. · DOI
- Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (Vol. 19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Inglehart, R. (2000). Globalization and postmodern values. Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215–228. · DOI
- Inglehart, R. (2003). Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys (Vol. 89). Leiden-Boston: Brill. · DOI
- Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 336–354. · DOI
- Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 19–51. · DOI · Paper page
- Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703. · DOI
- Javidan, M., & House, R. J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 289–305. · DOI · Paper page
- Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715. · DOI
- Jennings, J. E., Jennings, P. D., & Sharifian, M. (2014). Living the dream? Assessing the “entrepreneurship as emancipation” perspective in a developed region. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. doi: 10.1111/etap.12106 . · DOI
- Knutsen, O. (1990). Materialist and postmaterialist values and social structure in the Nordic countries: A comparative study. Comparative Politics, 23(1), 85–104. · DOI
- Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and possibility: Enacting an ethic of care through narrative practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663. · DOI
- Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small Business Economics, 40(3), 693–714. · DOI
- Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263. · DOI
- Luthar, H. K., & Karri, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics education and the perception of linkage between organizational ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 353–368. · DOI
- Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F., & York, J. G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493–509. · DOI · Paper page
- Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640. · DOI
- Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282. · DOI
- Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. · DOI
- Pakulski, J., Tranter, B., & Crook, S. (1998). The dynamics of environmental issues in Australia: Concerns, clusters and carriers. Australian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 235–252. · DOI
- Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Pathak, S., & Muralidharan, E. (2016). Informal institutions and their comparative influences on social and commercial entrepreneurship: The role of in-group collectivism and inter-personal trust. Journal of Small Business Management. Forthcoming. · DOI
- Pavlovich, K., & Corner, P. D. (2014). Conscious enterprise emergence: Shared value creation through expanded conscious awareness. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 341–351. · DOI
- Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570–581. · DOI
- Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2006). Multilevel modelling of complex survey data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(4), 805–827. · DOI
- Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69(2), 167–190. · DOI
- Radtke, R. R. (2000). The effects of gender and setting on accountants’ ethically sensitive decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(4), 299–312. · DOI
- Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Furrer, O., Kuo, M. H., Li, Y., Wangenheim, F., et al. (2014). Societal-level versus individual-level predictions of ethical behavior: A 48-society study of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 283–306.
- Reynolds, P. D. (2010). New firm creation: A global assessment of national, contextual, and individual factors. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 6(5–6). · DOI
- Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998-2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231. · DOI · Paper page
- Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. · DOI
- Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216. · DOI · Paper page
- Rubin, D. B., & Schenker, N. (1987). Interval estimation from multiply-imputed data: A case study using census agriculture industry codes. Journal of Official Statistics, 3(4), 375–387.
- Robalino, N., & Robson, A. (2012). The economic approach to ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2224–2233. · DOI
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values (Vol. 438). New York: Free Press.
- Roth, M. S. (1995). The effects of culture and socioeconomics on the performance of global brand image strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 163–175. · DOI
- Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. · DOI
- Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A., & Liñán, F. (2014). About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 49–66. · DOI
- Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137–182. · DOI · Paper page
- Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010. · DOI
- Shaver, K. G., Gartner, W. B., Crosby, E., Bakalarova, K., & Gatewood, E. J. (2001). Attributions about entrepreneurship: A framework and process for analyzing reasons for starting a business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 26(2), 5–33.
- Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170. · DOI
- Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 465–493. · DOI
- Simga-Mugan, C., Daly, B. A., Onkal, D., & Kavut, L. (2005). The influence of nationality and gender on ethical sensitivity: An application of the issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 139–159. · DOI
- Skoe, E. E., & Diessner, R. (1994). Ethic of care, justice, identity, and gender: An extension and replication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 272–289.
- Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior a 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 188–208. · DOI
- Smith, I. H., & Woodworth, W. P. (2012). Developing social entrepreneurs and social innovators: A social identity and self-efficacy approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 390–407. · DOI
- Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 0149206316633268. · DOI
- Stephan, U., Uhlaner, L. M., & Stride, C. (2014). Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 308–331. · DOI
- Sternberg, R., & Wennekers, S. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193–203. · DOI · Paper page
- Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. Handbook of organizations, 44(2), 142–193.
- Terjesen, S., Bosma, N. S., & Stam, E. (2015). Advancing public policy for high growth, female, and social entrepreneurs. Public Administration Review. doi: 10.1111/puar.12472 . · DOI
- Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. (2016). Comparative international entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 299–344. · DOI
- Tinsley, C. H., Howell, T. M., & Amanatullah, E. T. (2015). Who should bring home the bacon? How deterministic views of gender constrain spousal wage preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 37–48. · DOI
- Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Uhlaner, L., & Thurik, R. (2007). Postmaterialism influencing total entrepreneurial activity across nations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 161–185. · DOI
- Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Sarkis, J. (Eds.), (2012). Green growth: managing the transition to sustainable economies. In Green growth: Managing the transition to a sustainable economy, (pp. 1–25). Berlin: Springer.
- Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. · DOI
- Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2010). The embeddedness of women’s entrepreneurship in a transition context. In C. G. Brush, et al. (Eds.), Women entrepreneurs and the global environment for growth: A research perspective (pp. 96–117). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Williams, C. C., & Nadin, S. (2011). Beyond the commercial versus social entrepreneurship divide: Some lessons from English localities. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(2), 118–129. · DOI
- Wilson, M. S. (2005). A social-value analysis of postmaterialism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2), 209–224. · DOI
- World Bank. (2009). World Development Indicators (WB-WDI). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
- York, J. G., O'Neil, I., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2016). Exploring environmental entrepreneurship: identity coupling, venture goals, and stakeholder incentives. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 695-737. · DOI
- Zahra, S. A., Newey, L. R., & Li, Y. (2014). On the frontiers: The implications of social entrepreneurship for international entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 137–158. · DOI
- Zahra, S. A., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 117–131.
- Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368. · DOI
- Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054 · Cited by 95
Dynamic Configurations of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Elements for Blended Value Creation
Pelegrini, G. C., de Moraes, G. H. S. M., do Prado, N. B., Fischer, B. B., & Anholon, R. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3469 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hechavarría, D. M., Terjesen, S. A., Ingram, A. E., Renko, M., Justo, R., & Elam, A.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Terjesen, Siri A.
- Venue
- Small Business Economics
- Published
- 2016-07-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 225-257
- ISSN
- 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0913
- OpenAlex
- W2467034221
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 23.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Small Business Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
- Keywords
- entrepreneurs, gender gap, post-materialism, cultural values, care ethics, social value creation, environmental value creation, economic value creation, women entrepreneurs, startups, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review