Cited by 23scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Research on Impact Evaluation of Open Access Journals

Wei, Mingkun·2020·Scientometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, M.
Affiliations
Hebei University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wei, Mingkun
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
1027-1049
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2993973598
Cited by
23
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
open access journals, citation metrics, citation impact, Scopus, bibliometric analysis, scholarly communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review