Cited by 259scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPublishing and Scholarly Communication

The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention

Open access
Wang, Xianwen, Liu, Chen, Mao, Wenli, Fang, Zhichao·2015·Scientometrics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z.
Affiliations
Dalian University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xianwen
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2015-03-12
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
555-564
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W1996515099
Cited by
259
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
18.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
open access, citation advantage, article downloads, social media attention, article-level metrics, nature communication, scholarly impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review