CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Gender and Feminist StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologySexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Confirmation Bias and the Sexual Double Standard

Marks, Michael J., Fraley, R. Chris·2006·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insignificant confirmation bias for non-social matters contrasts with significant confirmation bias for beliefs about people and social affairs subject can determine.

    “This insignificant confirmation bias with respect to beliefs about non-social matters contrasts with findings of a significant confirmation bias with respect to beliefs about people (Talaifar and Swann 2017;Goodwin et al. 2000;Marks and Fraley 2006;Darley and Gross 1983), and, as I shall argue now, social affairs whose reality the subject can determine.”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Marks and Fraley 2006

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! New York: Harper Collins.
  2. White, E. (2002). Fast girls: Teenage tribes and the myth of the slut. New York: Scribner.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Marks, Michael J.
ORCID
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-01
Volume
54
Issue
1-2
Pages
19-26
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9
OpenAlex
W2100413942
Cited by
109
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
sexual double standard, confirmation bias, sexual stereotypes, gender differences in sexual behavior, memory retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review