The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Living with Contradictions · doi:10.4324/9780429499142-5 · Cited by 7,232
National Center for Education Statistics
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781412963848.n192 · Cited by 4,546
Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 · Cited by 3,435
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Intersectionality and research in psychology
Cole, E. R. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014564 · Cited by 2,722
Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013: (558442013-001)
(2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e558442013-001 · Cited by 2,471
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6626 · Cited by 2,212
Cited by
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413
Intersectional inequalities in science
Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Monroe-White, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2113067119 · Cited by 312
The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM
Cech, E. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1558 · Cited by 159
The philosophical basis of algorithmic recourse
Venkatasubramanian, S., & Alfano, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372876 · Cited by 114
Kaplan, D. M., Palitsky, R., Arconada Alvarez, S. J., Pozzo, N. S., Greenleaf, M. N., Atkinson, C. A., & Lam, W. A. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/51837 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 2019-06-03
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 127-141
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2947527030
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 72.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
- The paper
- Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K. (2020). How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
