Cited by 3,435Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance

Spencer, Steven J., Steele, Claude M., Quinn, Diane M.·1999·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People's levels of motivation and compliance, as well as potential stereotype-threat, will affect their scores in cognitive tests.

    “It is important to acknowledge that people's levels of motivation and compliance, as well as potential stereotype-threat (Croizet & Claire 1998; Spencer et al. 1999) will affect their scores in cognitive tests.”

    From Reading for pleasure and progress in vocabulary and mathematics (2015) · cites this paper as Spencer et al. 1999

  • Mere awareness of gender stereotypes can influence youths' academic performance.

    “Importantly, mere awareness of gender stereotypes can in fl uence youths ' academic performance.”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Spencer et al., 1999

  • When students are told that the test has never shown gender differences in the past, women perform as well as the men.

    “In comparison, when students are told that the test has never shown gender differences in the past, women perform as well as the men (Spencer et al., 1999).”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Spencer et al., 1999

  • When college students are told that the math test they are taking has shown gender differences favoring men in the past, women perform worse than men.

    “So, for example, when college students are told that the math test they are taking has shown gender differences favoring men in the past, women perform worse than men.”

    From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Spencer et al., 1999

  • Cues to stereotype threat range from blatant exposure to gender stereotypes to subtle activation.

    “Cues to stereotype threat can come in many forms ranging from more blatant and explicit exposure to gender stereotypes, such as telling participants that their experimenter is sexist or having them interact with a sexist man (Adams et al., 2006;Logel et al., 2009), to more subtle activation, such as simply asking someone to perform in a domain where there is a well-known stereotype”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Spencer, Steele, & Quinn, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
4-28
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075382077
Cited by
3,435
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 283 · 2019: 200 · 2018: 187 · 2017: 167 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 168 · 2014: 177 · 2013: 152 · 2012: 144
FWCI
55.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
stereotype threat, gender stereotypes, test anxiety, test difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review